Brady pause detection for implantable cardiac monitors
US-2018064360-A1 · Mar 8, 2018 · US
US10856761B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10856761-B2 |
| Application number | US-201815973107-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 7, 2018 |
| Priority date | May 7, 2018 |
| Publication date | Dec 8, 2020 |
| Grant date | Dec 8, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods and systems are provided for detecting arrhythmias in cardiac activity. The methods and systems declare a current beat, from the CA signals, to be a candidate beat or an ineligible beat based on whether the current beat satisfies the rate based selection criteria. The determining and declaring operations are repeated for multiple beats to form an ensemble of candidate beats. The method and system calculate a P-wave segment ensemble from the ensemble of candidate beats, perform a morphology-based comparison between the P-wave segment ensemble and at least one of a monophasic or biphasic template, declare a valid P-wave to be present within the CA signals based on the morphology-based comparison, and utilize the valid P-wave in an arrhythmia detection process to determine at least one of an arrhythmia entry, arrhythmia presence or arrhythmia exit.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer implemented method for detecting arrhythmias in cardiac activity, comprising: under control of one or more processors configured with specific executable instructions, obtaining a far field cardiac activity (CA) data set that includes far field CA signals for a series of beats, the far field CA signals collected by two or more electrodes located remote from a right atrium; determining, based on the far field CA signals, whether a current beat satisfies a rate based selection criteria; declaring the current beat, from the CA signals, to be a candidate beat or an ineligible beat based on whether the current beat satisfies the rate based selection criteria; repeating the determining and declaring operations for multiple beats to form an ensemble of candidate beats; calculating a P-wave segment ensemble by combining candidate P-wave segments from the far field CA signals for the ensemble of candidate beats; performing a morphology-based comparison between the P-wave segment ensemble and at least one of a monophasic or biphasic template; declaring a valid P-wave to be present within the CA signals based on the morphology-based comparison; and utilizing the valid P-wave in an arrhythmia detection process to determine at least one of an arrhythmia entry, arrhythmia presence or arrhythmia exit. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rate based selection criteria represents a RR interval rate criteria in which a beat is disregard, as the ineligible beat, when the RR interval is outside of a predetermined range. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining operation comprises applying a two-part selection test that includes i) determining whether an RR interval of the current beat is within a predetermined range and ii) determining whether the current beat is greater or shorter than a previous beat, and if shorter, determining whether the current beat has a duration that is within a range of the previous beat. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: overlaying a P-wave search window onto a candidate segment within corresponding candidate beats to obtain candidate P-wave segments; combining the candidate P-wave segments to form a P-wave combination; and determining whether a signal characteristic of interest from the P-wave combination exceeds one or more P-wave limits. 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising de-trending the ensemble of candidate beats to remove baseline drift from individual P-wave segments for corresponding candidate beats. 6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising normalizing the P-wave segment ensemble before performing the correlating operation. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising correlating a first P-wave segment, for a first beat from the ensemble of candidate beats, with the P-wave segment ensemble for the ensemble of candidate beats for morphology similarity analysis. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the declaring operation further comprises declaring the valid P-wave to be present within the CA signals when the correlation between the P-wave segment ensemble and at least one of the monophasic or biphasic template satisfies a correlation threshold. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the declaring operation further comprises declaring the P-wave segment ensemble to not include a P-wave when the correlation between the P-wave segment ensemble and both of the monophasic and biphasic templates do not satisfy a correlation threshold. 10. A computer implemented method for detecting arrhythmias in cardiac activity, comprising: under control of one or more processors configured with specific executable instructions, obtaining a far field cardiac activity (CA) data set that includes far field CA signals for a series of beats; determining whether a current beat satisfies a rate based selection criteria; declaring the current beat, from the CA signals, to be a candidate beat or an ineligible beat based on whether the current beat satisfies the rate based selection criteria; repeating the determining and declaring operations for multiple beats to form an ensemble of candidate beats; calculating a P-wave segment ensemble by combining candidate P-wave segments from the ensemble of candidate beats; performing a morphology-based comparison between the P-wave segment ensemble and at least one of a monophasic or biphasic template; declaring a valid P-wave to be present within the CA signals based on the morphology-based comparison; utilizing the valid P-wave in an arrhythmia detection process to determine at least one of an arrhythmia entry, arrhythmia presence or arrhythmia exit; and truncating the candidate P-wave segments when a signal characteristic exceeds one or more P-wave limits, the calculating operation calculating a final P-wave segment ensemble based on the candidate P-wave segments after truncation. 11. A system for detecting arrhythmias in cardiac activity, comprising: two or more electrodes configured to be located remote from a right atrium and to obtain far field cardiac activity (CA) signals; memory to store specific executable instructions; one or more processors configured to execute the specific executable instructions for: obtaining a far field CA data set that includes the far field CA signals for a series of beats; determining, based on the far field CA signals, whether a current beat satisfies a rate based selection criteria; declaring the current beat, from the CA signals, to be a candidate beat or an ineligible beat based on whether the current beat satisfies the rate based selection criteria; repeating the determining and declaring operations for multiple beats to form an ensemble of candidate beats; calculating a P-wave segment ensemble by combining candidate P-wave segments from the far field CA signals for the ensemble of candidate beats; performing a morphology-based comparison between the P-wave segment ensemble and at least one of a monophasic or biphasic template; declaring a valid P-wave to be present within the CA signals based on the morphology-based comparison; and utilizing the valid P-wave in an arrhythmia detection process to determine at least one of an arrhythmia entry, arrhythmia presence or arrhythmia exit. 12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the rate based selection criteria represents a RR interval rate criteria in which a beat is disregard, as the ineligible beat, when the RR interval is outside of a predetermined range. 13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to perform the determining operation by applying a two-part selection test that includes i) determining whether an RR interval of the current beat is within a predetermined range and ii) determining whether the current beat is greater or shorter than a previous beat, and if shorter, determining whether the current beat has a duration that is within a range of the previous beat. 14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to further: overlay a P-wave search window onto a candidate segment within corresponding candidate beats to obtain candidate P-wave segments; combine the candidate P-wave segments to form a P-wave combination; and determine whether a signal characteristic of interest from the P-wave combination exceeds one or more P-wave limits. 15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to de-trend the ensemble of candidate beats to remove baseline drift from individual P-wave segments for corresponding candidate beats. 16. The system of claim 11 , wherein the one
Detecting R peaks, e.g. for synchronising diagnostic apparatus; Estimating R-R interval · CPC title
by template matching · CPC title
Detecting fibrillation · CPC title
Detecting abnormal ECG interval, e.g. extrasystoles, ectopic heartbeats · CPC title
by using sensing means generating electric signals, {i.e. ECG signals} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.