Controlled flight of a multicopter experiencing a failure affecting an effector
US-2016107751-A1 · Apr 21, 2016 · US
US10845825B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10845825-B2 |
| Application number | US-201815946013-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 5, 2018 |
| Priority date | May 30, 2014 |
| Publication date | Nov 24, 2020 |
| Grant date | Nov 24, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for controlling an aircraft includes determining a target angular velocity of the aircraft based at least in part on a target attitude of the aircraft, determining a target angular acceleration of the aircraft based at least in part on the target angular velocity, and generating a command signal for at least one propulsion unit of the aircraft based at least in part on the target angular acceleration.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for controlling an aircraft, comprising: determining, using a first feedback controller, a target angular velocity of the aircraft based at least in part on a target attitude of the aircraft; determining, using a second feedback controller, a target angular acceleration of the aircraft based at least in part on the target angular velocity; and generating a command signal for at least one propulsion unit of the aircraft based at least in part on the target angular acceleration. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the command signal is generated at least in part by a third feedback controller. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the target angular acceleration is provided to a feedforward controller and wherein an output of the feedforward controller is used to generate the command signal. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising obtaining one or more aircraft configuration parameters based on one or more physical characteristics of the aircraft and wherein at least one of the aircraft configuration parameters is used to generate the command signal. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the one or more aircraft configuration parameters comprise a moment of inertia of the aircraft. 6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the one or more aircraft configuration parameters are provided to a feedforward controller that is based on the target angular acceleration. 7. A control system for an aircraft, comprising: one or more processors individually or collectively configured to: determine, using a first feedback controller, a target angular velocity of the aircraft based at least in part on a target attitude of the aircraft; determine, using a second feedback controller, a target angular acceleration of the aircraft based at least in part on the target angular velocity; and generate a command signal for at least one propulsion unit of the aircraft based at least in part on the target angular acceleration. 8. The control system of claim 7 , wherein the command signal is generated at least in part by a third feedback controller. 9. The control system of claim 7 , wherein the target angular acceleration is provided to a feedforward controller and wherein an output of the feedforward controller is used to generate the command signal. 10. The control system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to obtain one or more aircraft configuration parameters based on one or more physical characteristics of the aircraft and wherein at least one of the aircraft configuration parameters is used to generate the command signal. 11. The control system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more aircraft configuration parameters comprise a moment of inertia of the aircraft. 12. The control system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more aircraft configuration parameters are provided to a feedforward controller that is based on the target angular acceleration. 13. An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), comprising: one or more propulsion units for generating a lift; and one or more processors individually or collectively configured to: determine, using a first feedback controller, a target angular velocity of the UAV based at least in part on a target attitude of the UAV; determine, using a second feedback controller, a target angular acceleration of the UAV based at least in part on the target angular velocity; and generate a command signal for at least one propulsion unit of the UAV based at least in part on the target angular acceleration. 14. The UAV of claim 13 , wherein the command signal is generated at least in part by a third feedback controller. 15. The UAV of claim 13 , wherein the target angular acceleration is provided to a feedforward controller and wherein an output of the feedforward controller is used to generate the command signal. 16. The UAV of claim 13 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to obtain one or more aircraft configuration parameters based on one or more physical characteristics of the UAV and wherein at least one of the aircraft configuration parameters is used to generate the command signal. 17. The UAV of claim 16 , wherein the one or more aircraft configuration parameters are provided to a feedforward controller that is based on the target angular acceleration.
the propellers being fixed relative to the fuselage · CPC title
specially adapted for vertical take-off of aircraft · CPC title
Attitude, flight direction, or altitude control by jet reaction · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.