Method for determining hazard detection proficiency and rating insurance products based on proficiency
US-9384674-B2 · Jul 5, 2016 · US
US10810900B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10810900-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715443067-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 27, 2017 |
| Priority date | Mar 6, 2012 |
| Publication date | Oct 20, 2020 |
| Grant date | Oct 20, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system for determining vehicle driver hazard detection proficiency and calculating insurance discounts, the system comprising: an Internet device that presents to an Internet user a visual presentation of a continuous drive through a driving environment comprising at least two hazard modules, wherein each hazard module presents to the Internet user at least one driving scenario that comprises at least one hazard; an Internet device that records user viewing locations within the visual presentation, the user viewing locations corresponding to locations within the visual presentation that are viewed by the user during the visual presentation of the continuous drive; a computer analytics device comprising an algorithm that compares the recorded user viewing locations with defined locations of hazards within the visual presentation of the continuous drive, and determines a hazard detection proficiency of the user based at least on the comparison; a computer memory device comprising at least one minimum hazard detection proficiency criteria corresponding to an insurance discount; and a computer analytics device that compares the determined hazard detection proficiency of the user with the minimum hazard detection proficiency criteria and determines whether to award the insurance discount to the user.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for training vehicle drivers to detect hazards, the method comprising: visually presenting to a driver a continuous drive through a driving environment comprised of at least two hazard modules, wherein each hazard module presents at least one driving scenario that comprises at least one hazard; detecting where the driver looks to detect hazards within the visual presentation of the driving environment; recording where within the visual presentation of the driving environment the driver looks to detect hazards during the visual presentation of the continuous drive; calculating a hazard detection proficiency for the driver by evaluating whether the driver looked at particular hazards during the visual presentation of the continuous drive; using GPS and accelerometers associated with an internet-connected device to document the locations and driving conditions of actual drives; comparing the driver's calculated hazard detection proficiency to the documented locations and driving conditions of actual drives; and determining an available insurance premium discount based at least in part on (a) the comparison of the driver's hazard detection proficiency to proficiency criterion and (b) the comparison ofthe driver's hazard detection proficiency to the documented locations and driving conditions of actual drives. 2. The method for training vehicle drivers to detect hazards as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the visually presenting comprises presenting a plurality of hazard modules in a sequential order the first time the continuous drive is visually presented to the driver, and presenting the plurality of hazard modules in a different sequential order the second time the continuous drive is visually presented to the driver. 3. The method for training vehicle drivers to detect hazards as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the visually presenting comprises presenting at least one driving environment selected from: neighborhood, beyond your neighborhood, downtown, and highway. 4. The method for training vehicle drivers to detect hazards as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the recording where within the visual presentation the driver looks to detect hazards comprises detecting mouse clicks within target boxes, wherein the target boxes coincide with the hazards in the visual presentation. 5. The method for training vehicle drivers to detect hazards as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the recording where within the visual presentation the driver looks to detect hazards comprises detecting driver eye fixation on hazards in the visual presentation. 6. The method for training vehicle drivers to detect hazards as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the recording where within the visual presentation the driver looks to detect hazards comprises recording whether the driver timely looks to detect a hazard sufficiently in advance of a point of impact. 7. The method for training vehicle drivers to detect hazards as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the determining the driver's hazard detection proficiency comprises evaluating whether the driver has detected a minimum percentage of the total number of hazards in the visual presentation. 8. The method for training vehicle drivers to detect hazards as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising reviewing the continuous drive comprising: replaying the visual presentation; indicating hazards that the driver detected during the replay of the visual presentation; and indicating hazards that the driver failed to detect during the replay of the visual presentation. 9. A method for determining an insurance premium based at least in part of a vehicle driver's proficiency at detecting hazards, the method comprising: visually presenting at least one driving module that comprises at least one hazard; recording where within the visual presentation the driver looks to detect hazards during the visual presentation; determining a hazard detection proficiency for the driver by evaluating whether the driver looked at hazards during the visual presentation; using GPS and accelerometers associated with an internet-connected device to document the locations and driving conditions of actual drives; comparing the driver's calculated hazard detection proficiency to data sensed during actual drives; and determining an available insurance premium discount based at least in part on (a) the comparison of the driver's hazard detection proficiency to proficiency criterion and (b) the comparison of the driver's hazard detection proficiency to the sensed data. 10. The method for determining an insurance premium as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the visually presenting comprises a continuous drive through a driving environment comprised of at least two hazard modules, wherein each hazard module presents at least one driving scenario that comprises at least one hazard. 11. The method for determining an insurance premium as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the visually presenting comprises presenting at least one driving environment selected from: neighborhood, beyond your neighborhood, downtown, and highway. 12. The method for determining an insurance premium as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the recording where within the visual presentation the driver looks to detect hazards comprises recording whether the driver timely looks to detect a hazard sufficiently in advance of a point of impact. 13. The method for determining an insurance premium as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the determining the driver's hazard detection proficiency comprises evaluating whether the driver has detected a minimum percentage of the total number of hazards in the visual presentation. 14. The method for determining an insurance premium as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the visually presenting comprises at least two continuous drives each through different driving environments, wherein the determining the driver's hazard detection proficiency comprises determining whether the driver has detected a minimum percentage of hazards in each of the at least two continuous drives. 15. The method for determining an insurance premium as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the calculating comprises multiplying a total insurance discount by the percent of correctly detected hazards. 16. A system for determining vehicle driver hazard detection proficiency and calculating insurance discounts, the system comprising: an Internet device that presents to an Internetuser a visual presentation of a continuous drive through a driving environment comprising at least two hazard modules, wherein each hazard module presents to the Internetuser at least one driving scenario that comprises at least one hazard; an Internet device that detects where the user looks to detect hazards within the visual presentation of the driving environment; an Internet device that records user viewing locations within the visual presentation of the driving environment, the user viewing locations corresponding to locations within the visual presentation that are viewed by the user during the visual presentation of the continuous drive; GPS and accelerometers associated with an internet-connected device to document the locations and driving conditions of actual drives; a computer analytics device comprising an algorithm that compares the recorded user viewing locations with defined locations of hazards within the visual presentation of the continuous drive, and determines a hazard detection proficiency of the user based at least on the companson; the computer analytics device further comprising an algorithm that compares the driver's calculated hazard detection proficiency t
Insurance · CPC title
Trade or exchange of goods or services in exchange for incentives or rewards · CPC title
creating illusions of travel · CPC title
Control of land vehicles · CPC title
Education · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.