Systems And Methods Of Modeling Object Networks
US-2015154192-A1 · Jun 4, 2015 · US
US10796205B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10796205-B2 |
| Application number | US-201815971549-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 4, 2018 |
| Priority date | May 16, 2017 |
| Publication date | Oct 6, 2020 |
| Grant date | Oct 6, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A multi-view vector processing method and a multi-view vector processing device are provided. A multi-view vector x represents an object containing information on at least two non-discrete views. A model of the multi-view vector, where the model includes at least components of: a population mean μ of the multi-view vector, view component of each view of the multi-view vector and noise is established. The population mean μ, parameters of each view component and parameters of the noise , are obtained by using training data of the multi-view vector x. The device includes a processor and a storage medium storing program codes, and the program codes implements the aforementioned method when being executed by the processor.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method of multi-view vector processing by a processor, where a multi-view vector x represents an object containing information on at least two non-discrete views, the method comprising: establishing a model of the multi-view vector x, where the model includes at least components of: a population mean μ of the multi-view vector x, a view component of a view among the at least two non-discrete views of the multi-view vector x and noise ; and using training data of the multi-view vector x to obtain the population mean μ, parameters of the view component and parameters of the noise , where, the multi-view vector is obtained by processing a feature vector with a classifier, and the feature vector is obtained by directly vectorizing the object, and the classifier is configured to relatively separate the multi-view vector from the feature vector obtained by directly vectorizing the object to be represented, and a discreteness between an excluded view and the two non-discrete views of the multi-view vector x is higher than a discreteness between the two non-discrete views of the multi-view vector x. 2. The method according to claim 1 , where the population mean μ, is set as zero. 3. The method according to claim 1 , where the view component of the view is based on a product of a space basis S i corresponding to the view and a coefficient u i —selected for the view, where i is a sequence number of the view. 4. The method according to claim 3 , where the noise is set to meet a Gauss distribution taking a diagonal matrix Σ as a covariance. 5. The method according to claim 4 , where to use the training data includes: obtaining the population mean μ, space base S n of the view and the Σ, based on the training data by using an expectation-maximization algorithm. 6. The method according to claim 5 , where in the expectation-maximization algorithm, mean expected values of a plurality of samples for the multi-view vector x with respect to the selected coefficient u i for the view component of the view, and expected values related to covariance with respect to the selected coefficient u i for the view component of the view, are calculatable based on μ, S n and Σ, and μ, S n and Σ are recalculatable until the mean expected values of the samples for the multi-view vector x and the expected values related to covariance converge. 7. The method according to claim 4 , where space bases of the at least two non-discrete views are respectively recorded as S and T, and the multi-view vector x is represented as x ijk =μ+ Su i +Tv j +ϵ ijk where μ represents the population mean, u i represents a coefficient corresponding to an i-th selection for the view corresponding to the space basis S, v j represents a coefficient corresponding to a j-th selection for the view corresponding to the space basis T, ϵ ijk represents the noise , and k represents a k-th sample under the i-th selection and the j-th selection. 8. The method according to claim 7 , where if θ={μ, S, T, Σ} and B=[S T], then the following distribution is met: P ( x ijk |u i ,v j ,θ)= N ( x ijk |μ+Su i +Tv j ,Σ), P ( u i )= N ( u i |0, I ), P ( v j )= N ( v j |0, I ), where N(x|μ, Σ) is a normal distribution with a mean of μ, and a variance of Σ, and | is a unit matrix. 9. The method according to claim 7 , where the multi-view vector x ijk represents a voiceprint for a k-th sample of a j-th type of text by an i-th speaker, u i is a coefficient of the i-th speaker and v j is a coefficient of the j-th type of text. 10. The method according to claim 1 , further including; calculating a first likelihood representing that at least one view component is same among view components of at least two non-discrete views in two multi-view vectors and a second likelihood representing that the at least one view component is different among the view components of the at least two non-discrete views in the two multi-view vectors, by using population mean μ, parameters of a view component and parameters of noise of respective two multi-view vectors; and determining whether the at least one view component is same in the two multi-view vectors based on the first and second likelihoods. 11. The method according to claim 10 , further including calculating a first probability representing that at least one view component is same among view components of at least two non-discrete views in the two multi-view vectors and a second probability representing that the at least one view component is different among the view components of the at least two non-discrete views in the two multi-view vectors based on the calculated first and second likelihoods, and determining whether the at least one view component is same in the two multi-view vectors based on the first and second probabilities. 12. The method according to claim 10 , further including: determining whether at least two of the view components are same among view components of at least two non-discrete views in the two multi-view vectors. 13. The method according to claim 8 , further including: calculating a first likelihood representing that two view components both are same among view components of at least two non-discrete views in two multi-view vectors and a second likelihood representing that the two view components are different among the view components of the at least two non-discrete views in the two multi-view vectors based on the determined parameters of the multi-view vector model, and determining whether the two view components are both the same in the two multi-view vectors based on the first and second likelihoods, where the first likelihood representing that a plurality of the view components are same, A = 𝒩 ( [ x t x s ] | [ μ μ ] , [ SS T +
of extracted features · CPC title
based on parametric or probabilistic models, e.g. based on likelihood ratio or false acceptance rate versus a false rejection rate · CPC title
Matching criteria, e.g. proximity measures · CPC title
Feature extraction · CPC title
Validation; Performance evaluation; Active pattern learning techniques · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.