Use of extracts of distillers' dried grains with solubles as biopesticides and/or biostimulants
US-2024315259-A1 · Sep 26, 2024 · US
US10793480B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10793480-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816468603-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 26, 2018 |
| Priority date | Feb 27, 2017 |
| Publication date | Oct 6, 2020 |
| Grant date | Oct 6, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present invention provides a method for the preparation of multi-nutrient potassic fertilizer, by recovering potassium from sugarcane molasses based alcohol distillery effluent (commonly known as ‘spent wash’). The process involves pre-treatment of spent wash to clarify the aqueous phase and utilization of the treated spent wash in production of potassic fertilizer. The present invention enables utilisation of spent wash for recovery of value-added product (viz., potash fertiliser of >99% purity) and improves ease of ‘Zero Liquid Discharge’ compliance by subjecting the relatively benign process effluent to industrially practiced techniques for water recovery and salt reclamation.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A process for the preparation of multi-nutrient potassic fertiliser, more specifically mono potassium phosphate, by recovering potassium from spent wash, wherein the said process comprising the following steps: (i) lime treatment of spent wash to generate carbon-rich sludge having pH greater than 12.0; (ii) reacting the supernatant/filtrate obtained from step (i) with carbon dioxide till the pH is in the range of 8.0 to 9.0 to reduce calcium content in the solution; (iii) reacting the supernatant/filtrate obtained from step (ii) with sulphuric acid to achieve a pH of less than 2.5 so as to minimise calcium content in solution; (iv) reacting the supernatant/filtrate obtained from step (iii) with tartaric acid and sodium hydroxide to effect precipitation of potassium bitartrate while maintaining the pH in the range of 2.5 to 3.1; (v) treating the supernatant/filtrate obtained from step (iv) with calcium oxide/carbonate till the pH comes in the range of 5.0 to 6.0 to recover residual tartrate as calcium tartrate; (vi) discharging the supernatant/effluent obtained from step (v) as process effluent for subsequent environmental remediation/water recovery/salt reclamation; (vii) reacting the potassium bitartrate obtained from step (iv) with calcium oxide/hydroxide/carbonate and phosphoric acid to produce solution of mono potassium phosphate, while precipitating calcium tartrate; (viii) crystallising white crystalline mono potassium phosphate with purity >99% through cooling/evaporating the supernatant/filtrate obtained from step (vii); (ix) treating the calcium tartrate precipitate obtained from step (v) & step (vii) with aqueous solution of sodium carbonate at a temperature in the range of 50 to 80 degree C. to generate disodium tartrate solution, while precipitating calcium carbonate; (x) using the disodium tartrate solution obtained from step (ix) for further process cycles in the reaction in step (iv) with additional quantity of sulphuric acid for in-situ generation of bitartrate ions; (xi) using the calcium carbonate obtained from step (ix) for further process cycles in the reactions in step (v) & step (vii)). 2. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein lime treatment results in clarification of spent wash. 3. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein potassium bitartrate precipitation is effected by maintaining mole ratio of tartaric acid and potassium content in treated spent wash in the range of 1.0 to 1.1. 4. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein potassium bitartrate is reacted with equimolar quantity of lime and phosphoric acid to produce mono potassium phosphate. 5. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein insoluble tartrate salt is converted into soluble tartrate salt by reacting calcium tartrate with sodium carbonate. 6. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein tartaric acid is recycled as disodium tartrate. 7. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the pH of the reaction mixture in step (i) is maintained in the range of 12.5-13.5. 8. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein purging of carbon dioxide in step (ii) is done till the pH reaches 8.5. 9. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the pH in step (iv) is maintained in the range of 2.8 to 2.9.
Waste from chemical processing of material, e.g. diestillation, roasting, cooking · CPC title
Preparation from liquid orthophosphoric acid or from an acid solution or suspension of orthophosphates · CPC title
Fertilisers based essentially on alkali or ammonium orthophosphates (C05B11/00 takes precedence) · CPC title
Fertilizers of biological origin, e.g. guano or fertilizers made from animal corpses · CPC title
using sulfuric acid · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.