Harmonizing composite images using deep learning
US-2018260668-A1 · Sep 13, 2018 · US
US10789678B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10789678-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816130871-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 13, 2018 |
| Priority date | May 1, 2018 |
| Publication date | Sep 29, 2020 |
| Grant date | Sep 29, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A superpixel sampling network utilizes a neural network coupled to a differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component to determine pixel-superpixel associations from a set of pixel features output by the neural network. The superpixel sampling network computes updated superpixel centers and final pixel-superpixel associations over a number of iterations.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A superpixel sampling network comprising: a neural network to generate a set of pixel features from an image; a differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component coupled to receive the pixel features from the neural network; the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component to: determine initial superpixel centers; determine pixel-superpixel associations as a differentiable exponential function of distance between the set of pixel features and the initial superpixel centers; determine updated superpixel centers; and wherein the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component operates for a number of iterations, each iteration utilizing the updated superpixel centers to compute the pixel-superpixel associations, the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component outputting the image with final pixel-superpixel associations. 2. The superpixel sampling network of claim 1 , wherein the neural network and the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component is end-to-end trainable, the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component utilizing soft pixel-superpixel associations. 3. The superpixel sampling network of claim 1 , wherein the pixel-superpixel associations are determined by: Q pi t =e −D(I p ,S i t-1 ) =e −∥I p −S i t-1 ∥ 2 wherein: Q denotes a soft association matrix; t denotes an iteration; p denotes a pixel identifier; i denotes a superpixel identifier; D denotes a distance between the pixel and the superpixel center; I denotes an image; and S denotes a superpixel cluster center location. 4. The superpixel sampling network of claim 1 , wherein the updated superpixel centers are determined by: S i t = 1 z i t ∑ p = 1 n Q pi t I p , wherein: Q denotes a soft association matrix; t denotes an iteration; p denotes a pixel identifier: i denotes a superpixel identifier; n denotes a number of pixels in the soft association matrix; Z denotes a normalization constant; I denotes an image; and S denotes a superpixel cluster center location. 5. The superpixel sampling network of claim 1 , wherein the final pixel-superpixel associations are converted to spatially-connected pixel-superpixel associations. 6. The superpixel sampling network of claim 1 , wherein the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component utilizes a reconstruction loss function. 7. The superpixel sampling network of claim 1 , wherein the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component utilizes a compactness loss function. 8. The superpixel sampling network of claim 1 , wherein the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component further utilizes a sum of a compactness loss function and a reconstruction loss function. 9. The superpixel sampling network of claim 1 , wherein the initial superpixel centers are determined uniformly across the image. 10. The superpixel sampling network of claim 1 , wherein the number of iterations is based on convergence of the pixel-superpixel associations of a current iteration with a previous iteration. 11. The superpixel sampling network of claim 1 , wherein the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component further determines small superpixels, the small superpixels below a threshold size, and merges each the small superpixels with a surrounding superpixel, the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component assigning a different cluster ID for each spatially-connected component. 12. The superpixel sampling network of claim 1 , wherein the neural network further comprises: a first convolution layer to: receive the image; and convolve the image into a first convolution layer output; a second convolution layer to convolve the first convolution layer output into a second convolution layer output; a first pooling layer to pool the second convolution layer output into a first pooling layer output; a third convolution layer to convolve the first pooling layer output into a third convolution layer output; a second pooling layer to pool the third convolution layer output into a second pooling layer output; a fourth convolution layer to convolve the second pooling layer output into a fourth convolution layer output; a first bilinear upsampler to upsample the third convolution layer output into a first bilinear upsampler output; a second bilinear upsampler to upsample the fourth convolution layer output into a second bilinear upsampler output; and a final convolution layer to: concatenate the image, the second convolution layer output, the first bilinear upsampler output, and the second bilinear upsampler output; and generate by convolution the set of pixel features. 13. The superpixel sampling network of claim 2 , wherein the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component further converts the soft pixel-superpixel associations to hard pixel-superpixel associations. 14. The superpixel sampling network of claim 6 , wherein the reconstruction loss function is: L recon = ( R,R *)= ( R,{tilde over (Q)}{circumflex over (Q)} T R ) wherein: L recon denotes the reconstruction loss function; L denotes a task-specific loss-function; R denotes pixel properties; R* denotes a pixel representation; Q ˜ denotes a row-normalized soft association matrix; Q{circumflex over ( )} denotes a column-normalized soft association matrix; and T denotes matrix transposition. 15. The superpixel sampling network of claim 7 , wherein the compactness loss function is: L compact =∥I xy −Ī xy ∥ 2 wherein: L compact denotes the compactness loss function; I XY denotes positional pixel features; and Ī −XY denotes an inverse mapping of positional pixel features. 16. The superpixel sampling network of claim 8 , wherein the compactness loss function is scaled by a factor of an order of [[10{circumflex over ( )}−5]]10 −5 . 17. A superpixel sampling network comprising: a neural network to input an image and to generate a set of pixel features from the image; and a differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component coupled to the neural network; the differentiable simple linear iterative clustering component to determine pixel-superpixel associations from the set of pixel features and initial superpixel centers by: Q pi t =e −D(I p ,S i t-1 ) =e −∥I p −S i t-1
using neural networks · CPC title
based on super-resolution, i.e. the output image resolution being higher than the sensor resolution · CPC title
Segmentation of patterns in the image field; Cutting or merging of image elements to establish the pattern region, e.g. clustering-based techniques; Detection of occlusion · CPC title
using neural networks · CPC title
using classification, e.g. of video objects · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.