Predictive caching and fetch priority
US-2015193347-A1 · Jul 9, 2015 · US
US10776386B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10776386-B2 |
| Application number | US-201815868505-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 11, 2018 |
| Priority date | Dec 28, 2017 |
| Publication date | Sep 15, 2020 |
| Grant date | Sep 15, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The disclosed technology relates to a system configured to compute a difference between a local tree data structure representing a file system state for content items associated with a user account on the computing system and a sync tree data structure representing a known synchronization state between a content management system and the computing system. The system is configured to generate, based on the difference, a set of operations that when performed update the content items stored on the content management system to converge a server state for content items associated the user account on the content management system and the file system state.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for synchronizing modifications to content items on a client device to a user account on a content management system, the method comprising: computing a difference between a local tree data structure representing a file system state for content items associated with the user account on the client device and a sync tree data structure representing a known synchronization state between the content management system and the client device; and generating, based on the difference, a set of operations that when performed update the content items stored on the content management system to converge a server state represented by a remote tree data structure for content items associated the user account on the content management system and the file system state. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising executing the set of operations. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the local tree data structure and the sync tree data structure are stored on the client device. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving, from the client device, client modification data for content items stored on the client device; and updating, based on the client modification data, the local tree. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising updating, based on the client modification data, the sync tree. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving, from the content management system, server modification data for content items stored by the content management system; and updating, based on the server modification data, the remote tree data structure. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising updating, based on the server modification data, the sync tree. 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: computing a second difference between the remote tree data structure representing the server state for content items associated with the user account on the content management system and the sync tree data structure representing the known synchronization state between the content management system and the client device; and generating, based on the second difference, a second set of operations that when performed on the client device update the content items stored on the client device to converge a file system state on the client device and the server state. 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising managing execution of the second set of operations. 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the remote tree data structure is stored on the client device. 11. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions, the instructions, when executed by a computing system, cause the computing system to: compute a difference between a local tree data structure representing a file system state for content items associated with a user account on the computing system and a sync tree data structure representing a known synchronization state between a content management system and the computing system; and generate, based on the difference, a set of operations that when performed update the content items stored on the content management system to converge a server state represented by a remote tree data structure for content items associated the user account on the content management system and the file system state. 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein instructions further cause the computing system to execute the set of operations. 13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the local tree data structure and the sync tree data structure are stored on the computing system. 14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein instructions further cause the computing system to: receive, from the computing system, client modification data for content items stored on the computing system; and update, based on the client modification data, the local tree. 15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14 , wherein instructions further cause the computing system to update, based on the client modification data, the sync tree. 16. A system comprising: one or more processors; and a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to: compute a difference between a local tree data structure representing a file system state for content items associated with a user account on the system and a sync tree data structure representing a known synchronization state between a content management system and the system; and generate, based on the difference, a set of operations that when performed update the content items stored on the content management system to converge a server state represented by a remote tree data structure for content items associated the user account on the content management system and the file system state. 17. The system of claim 16 , wherein instructions further cause the one or more processors to execute the set of operations. 18. The system of claim 16 , wherein the local tree data structure and the sync tree data structure are stored on the system. 19. The system of claim 16 , wherein instructions further cause the one or more processors to: receive, from the computing system, client modification data for content items stored on the computing system; and update, based on the client modification data, the local tree. 20. The system of claim 19 , wherein instructions further cause the one or more processors to update, based on the client modification data, the sync tree.
Replication, distribution or synchronisation of data between databases or within a distributed database system; Distributed database system architectures therefor · CPC title
File system administration, e.g. details of archiving or snapshots (error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in operations G06F11/14) · CPC title
Protocols · CPC title
Concurrency control, e.g. optimistic or pessimistic approaches · CPC title
Details of monitoring file system events, e.g. by the use of hooks, filter drivers, logs · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.