Enhanced distance data acquisition

US10768283B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-10768283-B2
Application numberUS-201615774762-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateNov 10, 2016
Priority dateNov 11, 2015
Publication dateSep 8, 2020
Grant dateSep 8, 2020

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A distance acquisition method comprising: initializing an optical ranging system, the optical ranging system including a plurality of pixels operable to covert incident light to electrical charges; collecting electrical charges with the plurality of exposed pixels over an integration time, each pixel collecting electrical charges with an amplification and a sensitivity; correlating the electrical charges collected in each pixel to an exposure value for each pixel, the exposure value corresponding to being adequately exposed, over-exposed, or under-exposed; identifying each exposure value for each pixel as being either valid or invalid, wherein a valid exposure value corresponds to an adequately exposed pixel and an invalid exposure value corresponds to an over-exposed or under-exposed pixel; totalling the number of valid exposure value pixels; totalling the number invalid exposure value pixels; determining an exposure ratio, the ratio being the number of pixels with valid exposure values divided by the number of pixels with invalid exposure values; totalling the number of over-exposed pixels; totalling the number of under-exposed pixels; determining an invalid exposure ratio, the invalid exposure ratio being the number of over-exposed pixels divided by the number of under-exposed pixels; and determining an average valid exposure value, the average valid exposure value being the average of the valid exposure values. The method additionally comprises: using the exposure ratio, the invalid exposure ratio and the average valid exposure to optimise the integration time; using the exposure value for each pixel to optimise the amplification and sensitivity for each pixel; and determining distance data from electrical charges collected from at least one of the plurality of pixels.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A distance acquisition method comprising: initializing an optical ranging system, the optical ranging system including a plurality of pixels operable to covert incident light to electrical charges; directing incident light to the plurality of pixels; collecting electrical charges with the plurality of pixels over an integration time, each pixel collecting electrical charges with an amplification and a sensitivity; correlating the electrical charges collected in each pixel to an exposure value for each pixel, the exposure value corresponding to an adequately exposed pixel, an over-exposed pixel, or an under-exposed pixel; identifying each exposure value for each pixel as being a valid exposure value or an invalid exposure value, wherein a valid exposure value corresponds to an adequately exposed pixel and an invalid exposure value corresponds to an over-exposed pixel or an under-exposed pixel; totaling the number of pixels with valid exposure values; totaling the number of pixels with invalid exposure values; determining an exposure ratio, the ratio being the number of pixels with valid exposure values divided by the number of pixels with invalid exposure values; totaling the number of over-exposed pixels; totaling the number of under-exposed pixels; determining an invalid exposure ratio, the invalid exposure ratio being the number of over-exposed pixels divided by the number of under-exposed pixels; and determining an average valid exposure value, the average valid exposure value being the average of the valid exposure values. 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising increasing the integration time when the invalid exposure ratio is less than the validity threshold value and an exposure threshold value, or decreasing the integration time when the invalid exposure ratio is less than the validity threshold value and greater than or equal to the exposure threshold value. 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: correlating the average valid exposure value to a scaling factor when the exposure ratio is greater than or equal to a validity threshold value; and altering the integration time with the scaling factor. 4. The method as in claim 2 or 3 , further comprising: directing incident light to the plurality of pixels; collecting electrical charges with the plurality of pixels over the integration time, each pixel collecting electrical charges with the amplification and the sensitivity; correlating the electrical charges collected in each pixel to the exposure value for each pixel, the exposure value corresponding to an adequately exposed pixel, an over-exposed pixel, or an under-exposed pixel; and increasing the amplification for each under-exposed pixel and decreasing the amplification for each over-exposed pixel. 5. The method as in claim 2 or 3 , further comprising: directing incident light to the plurality of pixels; collecting electrical charges with the plurality of pixels over the integration time, each pixel collecting electrical charges with the amplification and the sensitivity; correlating the electrical charges collected in each pixel to the exposure value for each pixel, the exposure value corresponding to an adequately exposed pixel, an over-exposed pixel, or an under-exposed pixel; and increasing the sensitivity for each under-exposed pixel and decreasing the sensitivity for each over-exposed pixel. 6. The method of claim 4 further comprising: directing incident light to the plurality of pixels; collecting electrical charges with the plurality of pixels over the integration time, each pixel collecting electrical charges with the amplification and the sensitivity; and determining distance data from electrical charges collected from at least one of the plurality of pixels. 7. The method of claim 5 further comprising: directing incident light to the plurality of pixels; collecting electrical charges with the plurality of pixels over the integration time, each pixel collecting electrical charges with the amplification and the sensitivity; and determining distance data from electrical charges collected from at least one of the plurality of pixels. 8. The method of claim 4 further comprising: increasing the sensitivity for each under-exposed pixel and decreasing the sensitivity for each over-exposed pixel; and determining distance data from electrical charges collected from at least one of the plurality of pixels. 9. The method of claim 4 further comprising: correlating the electrical charges collected in each pixel to the exposure value for each pixel, the exposure value corresponding to an adequately exposed pixel, an over-exposed pixel, or an under-exposed pixel; identifying each exposure value for each pixel as being a valid exposure value or an invalid exposure value, wherein a valid exposure value corresponds to an adequately exposed pixel and an invalid exposure value corresponds to an over-exposed pixel or an under-exposed pixel; totaling the number of pixels with valid exposure values; totaling the number of pixels with invalid exposure values; determining the exposure ratio, the ratio being the number of pixels with valid exposure values to the number of pixels with invalid exposure values; totaling the number of over-exposed pixels; totaling the number of under-exposed pixels; and determining the invalid exposure ratio when the exposure ratio is less than a second validity threshold value, the invalid exposure ratio being the number of over-exposed pixels divided by the number of under-exposed pixels. 10. The method of claim 9 further comprising increasing the integration time when the invalid exposure ratio is less than a second exposure threshold value, or decreasing the integration time when the invalid exposure ratio is greater than or equal to a second exposure threshold value. 11. The method of claim 9 further comprising: determining an average valid exposure value when the exposure ratio is greater than or equal to the second validity threshold value, correlating the average valid exposure value to a scaling factor; and altering the integration time with the scaling factor. 12. The method of claim 10 further comprising: directing incident light to the plurality of pixels; collecting electrical charges with the plurality of pixels over the integration time, each pixel collecting electrical charges with the amplification and the sensitivity; increasing the amplification for each under-exposed pixel and decreasing the amplification for each over-exposed pixel; increasing the sensitivity for each under-exposed pixel and decreasing the sensitivity for each over-exposed pixel; and determining distance data from electrical charges collected from at least one of the plurality of pixels. 13. The method of claim 10 further comprising: directing incident light to the plurality of pixels; collecting electrical charges with the plurality of pixels over the integration time, each pixel collecting electrical charges with the amplification and the sensitivity; increasing the amplification for each under-exposed pixel and decreasing the amplification for each over-exposed pixel; increasing the sensitivity for each under-exposed pixel and decreasing the sensitivity for each over-exposed pixel; and determining distance data from electrical charges collected from at least one of the plurality of pixels. 14. The method of claim 11 further comprising: directing incident light to the plurality of pixels; collecting electrical charges with the plurality of pixels over the integration time, each pixel col

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Three-dimensional [3D] imaging with simultaneous measurement of time-of-flight at a two-dimensional [2D] array of receiver pixels, e.g. time-of-flight cameras or flash lidar · CPC title

  • Correction of measurements (G01B9/02055 takes precedence) · CPC title

  • with phase comparison between the received signal and the contemporaneously transmitted signal · CPC title

  • Means for monitoring or calibrating · CPC title

  • for measuring contours or curvatures · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US10768283B2 cover?
A distance acquisition method comprising: initializing an optical ranging system, the optical ranging system including a plurality of pixels operable to covert incident light to electrical charges; collecting electrical charges with the plurality of exposed pixels over an integration time, each pixel collecting electrical charges with an amplification and a sensitivity; correlating the electric…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Ams Sensors Singapore Pte Ltd
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G01S7/4918. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Sep 08 2020 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 1 related publication on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).