Method and system for recording and debugging process flows

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10761972-B2
Application number	US-201916436599-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jun 10, 2019
Priority date	Sep 25, 2017
Publication date	Sep 1, 2020
Grant date	Sep 1, 2020

Abstract

Implementations include a method and system configured to allow users to track, record, and store process instances and use the recordings in the same or different environments in order to test, debug, and repair detected errors and anomalies in process flows. The method and system also provides a conceptual way where users can create tests by recording and playback one or more flow instances along with processing artifacts in order to test and debug their flow in a different environment to ensure flow executions work across updates, releases, and across different environments.

First claim

We claim:

1. A non-transitory computer readable medium including one or more instructions executable by one or more processors for:
receiving a recorded process flow that has been validated relative to a first environment;
processing the recorded process flow using a second environment;
processing the recorded process flow using a third environment, wherein the third environment is an updated version of the second environment;
receiving a first set of results of processing the recorded process flow using the second environment;
receiving a second set of results of processing the recorded process flow using the third environment;
determining differences between the first set of results and the second set of results;
receiving a compatibility threshold; and
analyzing the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results to determine whether the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crosses the compatibility threshold.

2. The computer readable medium of claim 1 , in response to the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crossing the compatibility threshold, providing an error signal.

3. The computer readable medium of claim 1 , in response to the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crossing the compatibility threshold, recursively repairing at least some of the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results until the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results are within the compatibility threshold.

4. The computer readable medium of claim 1 , in response to the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crossing the compatibility threshold, non-recursively repairing at least some of the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results until the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results are within the compatibility threshold.

5. The computer readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising setting at least one node of the recorded process flow to be a designated node.

6. The computer readable medium of claim 5 , further comprising varying an operation of the designated node as part of a stress test operation.

7. The computer readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising setting the designated node to emulate a mock service configured to test services associated with the recorded process flow.

8. A computer implemented method comprising:
receiving a recorded process flow that has been validated relative to a first environment;
processing the recorded process flow using a second environment;
processing the recorded process flow using a third environment, wherein the third environment is an updated version of the second environment;
receiving a first set of results of processing the recorded process flow using the second environment;
receiving a second set of results of processing the recorded process flow using the third environment;
determining differences between the first set of results and the second set of results;
receiving a compatibility threshold; and
analyzing the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results to determine whether the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crosses the compatibility threshold.

9. The method of claim 8 , in response to the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crossing the compatibility threshold, providing an error signal.

10. The method of claim 8 , in response to the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crossing the compatibility threshold, recursively repairing at least some of the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results until the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results are within the compatibility threshold.

11. The method of claim 8 , in response to the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crossing the compatibility threshold, non-recursively repairing at least some of the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results until the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results are within the compatibility threshold.

12. The method claim 8 , further comprising setting at least one node of the recorded process flow to be a designated node.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising varying an operation of the designated node as part of a stress test operation.

14. The method of claim 12 , further comprising setting the designated node to emulate a mock service configured to test services associated with the recorded process flow.

15. An apparatus comprising:
one or more processors; and
logic encoded in one or more tangible media for execution by the one or more processors and when executed operable to:
receive a recorded process flow that has been validated relative to a first environment;
process the recorded process flow using a second environment;
process the recorded process flow using a third environment, wherein the third environment is an updated version of the second environment;
receive a first set of results of processing the recorded process flow using the second environment;
receive a second set of results of processing the recorded process flow using the third environment;
determine differences between the first set of results and the second set of results;
receive a compatibility threshold; and
analyze the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results to determine whether the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crosses the compatibility threshold.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 , in response to the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crossing the compatibility threshold, provide an error signal.

17. The apparatus of claim 15 , in response to the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crossing the compatibility threshold, recursively repair at least some of the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results until the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results are within the compatibility threshold.

18. The apparatus of claim 15 , in response to the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results crossing the compatibility threshold, non-recursively repair at least some of the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results until the differences between the first set of results and the second set of results are within the compatibility threshold.

19. The apparatus of claim 15 , further comprising set at least one node of the recorded process flow to be a designated node.

20. The apparatus of claim 19 , further comprising vary an operation of the designated node as part of a stress test operation.

Assignees

• Oracle Int Corp

Inventors

• Palanisamy Muthukumar
• Modi Rajan
• Bellala Adinarayana

Classifications

• G06F11/3698 Primary

  Environments for analysis, debugging or testing of software · CPC title

• G06F11/362

  Debugging of software · CPC title

• G06F11/0706

  the processing taking place on a specific hardware platform or in a specific software environment · CPC title

• G06F11/3684 Primary

  for test design, e.g. generating new test cases · CPC title

• G06F11/0754

  by exceeding limits · CPC title