Method for purging fuel vapors to an engine
US-9222443-B2 · Dec 29, 2015 · US
US10753293B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10753293-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816188851-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 13, 2018 |
| Priority date | Dec 8, 2017 |
| Publication date | Aug 25, 2020 |
| Grant date | Aug 25, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for controlling an air-fuel ratio in an idle purge-off mode is provided. The method includes stopping feedback for an amount of fuel for a particular period of time when idle purging is terminated and performing freeze control with a constant lambda control value.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for controlling an air-fuel ratio in an idle purge-off mode, comprising the steps of: executing, by a controller, a purge-on mode in which purging of a canister begins; storing, by the controller, a constant lambda control value at a start time of the purging; executing, by the controller, a purge-off mode in which a purge-off occurs; determining, by the controller, a condition for performing a freeze control where feedback for an amount of fuel injection is stopped for a particular period of time when the purge-off occurs and the air-fuel ratio is adjusted with the constant lambda control value at a beginning of the purging; setting, by the controller, a freeze control time in which a start time and a release time for performing the freeze control are set based on the constant lambda control value stored in the storing step; and performing, by the controller, the freeze control with the constant lambda control value for a time between the start time and the release time. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining step further includes determining, by the controller, whether a current state is an idle state, whether a current situation is an evaporated gas leak diagnosis situation, and each of a purge concentration learning value and the constant lambda control value is less than or equal to a set value. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the setting step includes setting, by the controller, the start time to be greater than the release time to deactivate the performing of the freeze control when the constant lambda control value stored in the storing step is a minimal value and occurrence of a lean peak is inevitable even though the performing of the freeze control is performed. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the freeze control is performed when purge learning is performed insufficiently in a high concentration canister situation. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the freeze control is performed when a current state is an idle state, a current situation is not an evaporated gas leak diagnosis situation, and each of a purge concentration learning value and the constant lambda control value is equal to or less than a set value. 6. The method of claim 5 , wherein learning a purge concentration in the canister is performed using a behavior of an oxygen sensor during the purging. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the particular period of time is determined based on the constant lambda control value at the beginning of the purging. 8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: setting, by the controller, the particular period of time to be less than 0 to deactivate the performing of the freeze control when the constant lambda control value at the beginning of the purging is a minimal value and occurrence of a lean peak is inevitable even through the performing of the freeze control is performed. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the constant lambda control value is determined based on a level of the air-fuel ratio. 10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the constant lambda control value determined based on a level of the air-fuel ratio is greater than 1. 11. A method for controlling an air-fuel ratio in an idle purge-off mode, comprising the steps of: executing, by a controller, a purge-on mode in which purging of a canister begins; executing, by the controller, a purge-off mode in which a purge-off occurs; determining, by the controller, a condition for performing a freeze control where feedback for an amount of fuel injection is stopped for a particular period of time when the purge-off occurs and the air-fuel ratio is adjusted with a constant lambda control value at a beginning of the purging; and performing, by the controller, the freeze control with the constant lambda control value. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the constant lambda control value is determined based on a level of the air-fuel ratio for the particular period of time. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the constant lambda control value determined based on a level of the air-fuel ratio is greater than 1.
Judging failure of purge control system · CPC title
the characteristics being an oxygen content or concentration or the air-fuel ratio · CPC title
Controlling the purging of the canister as a function of the engine operating conditions · CPC title
Adding fuel vapours, e.g. drawn from engine fuel reservoir · CPC title
for idling (F02D41/06, F02D41/16 take precedence) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.