Engine noise control
US-2017110108-A1 · Apr 20, 2017 · US
US10741165B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10741165-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816119468-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 31, 2018 |
| Priority date | Aug 31, 2018 |
| Publication date | Aug 11, 2020 |
| Grant date | Aug 11, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A noise-cancellation system, including: a noise-cancellation filter configured to generate a noise-cancellation signal; an actuator configured to receive the noise-cancellation signal and to transduce a noise-cancellation audio signal based on the noise-cancellation signal, the noise-cancellation audio signal destructively interfering with an undesired noise in a noise-cancellation zone in a predefined volume; an error sensor configured to output an error sensor signal, the error sensor signal being representative of residual undesired noise in the noise-cancellation zone; a performance cost filter configured to receive and filter the error sensor signal and to output a performance cost filter signal, the performance cost filter signal being representative of the error sensor signal as weighted by a performance cost function; and an adjustment module configured to receive the performance cost filter signal and to adjust the noise-cancellation filter such that the noise-cancellation audio signal minimizes the performance cost filter signal.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A noise-cancellation system, comprising: a noise-cancellation filter generating a noise-cancellation signal; an actuator receiving the noise-cancellation signal and transducing a noise-cancellation audio signal based on the noise-cancellation signal, the noise-cancellation audio signal interfering with an undesired noise in a noise-cancellation zone in a predefined volume; an error sensor outputting an error sensor signal, the error sensor signal being representative of residual undesired noise in the noise-cancellation zone; a performance cost filter receiving and filtering the error sensor signal and outputting a performance cost filter signal, the performance cost filter signal being representative of the error sensor signal as weighted by a performance cost function; and an adjustment module receiving the performance cost filter signal and adjusting the noise-cancellation filter such that the noise-cancellation audio signal minimizes the performance cost filter signal. 2. The noise-cancellation system of claim 1 , further comprising: an actuator effort cost filter receiving and filtering the noise-cancellation signal and outputting an actuator effort cost filter signal, the actuator effort cost filter signal being representative of the noise-cancellation signal as weighted by an actuator effort cost function, wherein the adjustment module further receives the actuator effort cost filter signal and adjusts the noise-cancellation filter such that the noise-cancellation audio signal minimizes the actuator effort cost filter signal. 3. The noise-cancellation system of claim 1 , wherein the error sensor is a microphone. 4. The noise-cancellation system of claim 1 , wherein the actuator is a speaker. 5. The noise-cancellation system of claim 1 , wherein the performance cost function increases the interference of a predetermined a frequency. 6. The noise-cancellation system of claim 1 , wherein the performance cost function increases the interference in the noise-cancellation zone and decreases the interference in a second noise-cancellation zone. 7. The noise-cancellation system of claim 2 , wherein the actuator effort cost function penalizes actuator effort within a range of frequencies. 8. The noise-cancellation system of claim 7 , wherein the actuator effort cost function penalizes actuator effort below a first frequency and above a second frequency, wherein the second frequency is higher than the first frequency. 9. A noise-cancellation system, comprising: a noise-cancellation filter generating a noise-cancellation signal; an actuator receiving the noise-cancellation signal and transducing a noise-cancellation audio signal based on the noise-cancellation signal, the noise-cancellation signal interfering with an undesired noise signal in a noise-cancellation zone; an error sensor outputting an error sensor signal, the error sensor signal being representative of residual undesired noise in the noise-cancellation zone; an actuator effort cost filter receiving and filtering the noise-cancellation signal and outputting an actuator effort cost filter signal, the actuator effort cost filter signal being representative of the noise-cancellation as weighted by an actuator effort cost function; an adjustment module receiving the actuator effort cost filter signal and adjusting the noise-cancellation filter such that the noise-cancellation audio signal minimizes the actuator effort cost filter signal. 10. The noise-cancellation system of claim 9 , wherein the error sensor is a microphone. 11. The noise-cancellation system of claim 9 , wherein the actuator effort cost function penalizes actuator effort within a range of frequencies. 12. The noise-cancellation system of claim 11 , wherein the actuator effort cost function penalizes actuator effort below a first frequency and above a second frequency, wherein the second frequency is higher than the first frequency. 13. A noise-cancellation method, comprising; generating, with a noise-cancellation filter, a noise-cancellation signal; providing the noise-cancellation signal to an actuator for transduction of a noise-cancellation audio signal based on the noise-cancellation signal, the noise-cancellation signal interfering with an undesired noise signal in a noise-cancellation zone; receiving an error sensor signal from an error sensor, the error sensor signal being representative of residual undesired noise in the noise-cancellation zone; filtering the error sensor signal with a performance cost filter to output a performance cost filter signal, the performance cost filter signal being representative of the error sensor signal as weighted by a performance cost function; and adjusting the noise-cancellation filter based on the performance cost filter signal, such that the noise-cancellation audio signal minimizes the performance cost filter signal. 14. The noise-cancellation method of claim 13 further comprising: filtering the noise-cancellation signal with an actuator effort cost filter that outputs an actuator effort cost filter signal, the actuator effort cost filter signal being representative of the noise-cancellation signal as weighted by an actuator effort cost function, and adjusting the noise-cancellation filter based on the actuator effort cost filter signal, such that the noise-cancellation audio signal minimizes the actuator effort cost filter signal. 15. The noise-cancellation method of claim 13 , wherein the error sensor is a microphone. 16. The noise-cancellation method of claim 13 , wherein the actuator is a speaker. 17. The noise-cancellation method of claim 13 , wherein the performance cost function increases the interference of a predetermined a frequency. 18. The noise-cancellation method of claim 13 , wherein the performance cost function increases the interference in the noise-cancellation zone and to decrease the interference in a second noise-cancellation zone. 19. The noise-cancellation method of claim 14 , wherein the actuator effort cost function penalizes actuator effort within a range of frequencies. 20. The noise-cancellation method of claim 19 , wherein the actuator effort cost function penalizes actuator effort below a first frequency and above a second frequency, wherein the second frequency is higher than the first frequency.
characterised by the analysis of input or output signals, e.g. frequency range, modes, transfer functions · CPC title
using an error signal without a reference signal, e.g. pure feedback · CPC title
Feedforward · CPC title
Automobiles · CPC title
Filtering, e.g. Kalman filters or special analogue or digital filters · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.