Security for devices connected to a network
US-10460103-B2 · Oct 29, 2019 · US
US10728275B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10728275-B2 |
| Application number | US-201815922695-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 15, 2018 |
| Priority date | Mar 15, 2017 |
| Publication date | Jul 28, 2020 |
| Grant date | Jul 28, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system and method are disclosed wherein a risk score is generated by interrogating multiple sources of information across a network. The information is aggregated, such that every network action for individuals and organizations are turned into a unique behavioral model, which can be used as a unique identifier (“fingerprint”). This fingerprint is in turn used by a personalized Trust Guardian System to block, modify and/or allow network actions.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method comprising the steps of: receiving, at a device including a trust guardian system, a request from an unknown requestor; sending, from the device's trust guardian system, at least one query about the unknown requestor to at least one other trust guardian system associated with a trusted source; receiving, at the device's trust guardian system, response information from the trusted source about the unknown requestor; analyzing, at the device's trust guardian system, the response information to determine risk level associated with responding to the unknown requestor's request; generating a risk graph for the unknown requestor, wherein the risk graph includes a visual representation of risk; determining a response to be sent to the unknown requestor; determining, when the response is to be sent, a plurality of communication parameters used to provide the response; and modifying at least one communication parameter of the plurality of communication parameters to change response speed and allow further investigation about the unknown requestor. 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of sending the response using response parameters that are the same as the request's communication parameters, when the risk of sending the response is low. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein modifying the at least one communication parameter is performed without alerting the unknown requestor, when the risk of sending the response is high. 4. The method of claim 1 further comprising redirecting the request without alerting the unknown requestor. 5. The method of claim 1 further comprising redirecting the request to a control node, without alerting the unknown requestor, to investigate and gather additional information about the unknown requestor. 6. The method of claim 1 further comprising sending a false response to the request when the risk is high.
using hash chains, e.g. blockchains or hash trees · CPC title
Routing a service request depending on the request content or context · CPC title
Risk-dependent, e.g. selecting a security level depending on risk profiles · CPC title
Entity profiles · CPC title
involving non-keyed hash functions, e.g. modification detection codes [MDCs], MD5, SHA or RIPEMD · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.