Systems and methods for creating and using combined predictive models to control hvac equipment
US-2018113482-A1 · Apr 26, 2018 · US
US10713595B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10713595-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715811759-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 14, 2017 |
| Priority date | Sep 22, 2017 |
| Publication date | Jul 14, 2020 |
| Grant date | Jul 14, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Controlling circumferential variability in a blast furnace may include generating a predictive model that sets up a relationship between a standard deviation of a selected state variable, state variables and one or more control variables in blast furnace operation for predicting the standard deviation. A number of circumferential sections of the blast furnace is defined, and the predictive model associated with the selected state variable for each of the circumferential sections is trained based on process data of the blast furnace. A plurality trained predictive models is generated associated with different circumferential sections and different selected state variables. One or more future control variable set points that minimize a sum of the plurality of predictive models, is determined. One or more future control variable set points is transmitted to a control system to control the blast furnace operation.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A method of controlling circumferential variability in a blast furnace, the method performed by at least one hardware processor, the method comprising: generating a predictive model that sets up a relationship between a standard deviation of a selected state variable, state variables and at least one control variable in blast furnace operation for predicting a future circumferential variability index associated with the selected state variable; defining a number of circumferential sections of the blast furnace; receiving process data associated with the blast furnace operation; training the predictive model associated with the selected state variable for each of the circumferential sections based on the process data, wherein a plurality of trained predictive models is generated associated with different circumferential sections and different selected state variables, the different selected state variables comprising temperature and pressure, wherein running the plurality of trained predictive models outputs a plurality of future circumferential variability indices, each of the future circumferential variability indices corresponding to a respective circumferential section and selected state variable; determining at least one future control variable set point that minimizes a sum of the future circumferential variability indices by solving an optimization problem; and transmitting the at least one future control variable set point to a control system to control the blast furnace operation. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the blast furnace operation is a continuous operation. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining at least one future control variable set point that minimizes a sum of the future circumferential variability indices, comprises determining at least one future control variable set point that minimizes a weighted sum of the future circumferential variability indices. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one future control variable set point comprises control variable set points associated with a plurality of future time points. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the optimization problem includes a regularization term that controls value fluctuations of the one or more future control variable set points between future time points. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one control variable includes one of dumping rate of input material, a flow rate of blast air, moisture content of blast air, an oxygen enrichment amount of blast air, and a flow rate of pulverized coal. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predictive model's relationship between a standard deviation of a selected state variable, state variables and at least one control variable in blast furnace operation defines a future standard deviation value of the selected state variable as a function of past standard deviations of the selected state variable, past values of the state variables, past values of the at least one control variable and future values of the at least one control variable. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predictive model comprises a deep learning model comprising long short-term memory.
Dynamic search techniques; Heuristics; Dynamic trees; Branch-and-bound · CPC title
Recurrent networks, e.g. Hopfield networks · CPC title
characterised by memory or gating, e.g. long short-term memory [LSTM] or gated recurrent units [GRU] · CPC title
Learning methods · CPC title
Supervised learning · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.