End-to-end learning of dialogue agents for information access
US-2018060301-A1 · Mar 1, 2018 · US
US10699697B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10699697-B2 |
| Application number | US-201815940197-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 29, 2018 |
| Priority date | Mar 29, 2018 |
| Publication date | Jun 30, 2020 |
| Grant date | Jun 30, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Provided are a speech recognition training processing method and an apparatus including the same. The speech recognition training processing method includes acquiring a multi-talker mixed speech signal from a plurality of speakers, performing permutation invariant training (PIT) model training on the multi-talker mixed speech signal based on knowledge from a single-talker speech recognition model and updating a multi-talker speech recognition model based on a result of the PIT model training.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method of performing speech recognition training performed by at least one processor, the method comprising: acquiring, by the at least one processor, a multi-talker mixed speech signal from a plurality of speakers; performing, by the at least one processor, permutation invariant training (PIT) model training on the multi-talker mixed speech signal based on knowledge from a single-talker speech recognition model; and updating, by the at least one processor, a multi-talker speech recognition model based on a result of the PIT model training. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the single-talker speech recognition model is a teacher model, and the multi-talker speech recognition model is a student model. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the PIT model training uses labels from the single-talker speech recognition model, the labels being posteriors from inputting a single-talker data corresponding to one or more of the plurality of speakers into the single-talker speech recognition model. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprises: performing PIT model training on a single talker feature corresponding to one or more of the plurality of speakers; and transferring posteriors from the performing the PIT model training on the single talker feature as soft label input for the multi-talker speech recognition model. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the performing PIT model training comprises: performing a bidirectional long-short term memory (BLSTM) operation on the multi-talker mixed speech signal by assigning soft labels that are posteriors from inputting a single-talker data corresponding to one or more of the plurality of speakers into the single-talker speech recognition model and generating a plurality of estimated output segments for multi-talker mixed speech signal; and minimizing a minimal average cross entropy (CE) for utterances of all possible assignments between the plurality of estimated output segments and soft labels. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the minimal average cross entropy (CE) is determined based on equation (1) and (2): J = 1 S min s ′ ∈ permu ( S ) ∑ s ∑ t ∑ y p ′ ( y | o t s s ′ ) log p θ s ( y | o t ) ( 1 ) p ′ ( y | o t s s ′ ) = λ p teacher ( y | o t s s ′
Training · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.