Motion artifact reduction of magnetic resonance images with an adversarial trained network

US10698063B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-10698063-B2
Application numberUS-201816008086-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateJun 14, 2018
Priority dateNov 1, 2017
Publication dateJun 30, 2020
Grant dateJun 30, 2020

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Systems and methods are provided for correcting motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images. An image-to-image neural network is used to generate motion corrected magnetic resonance data given motion corrupted magnetic resonance data. The image-to-image neural network is coupled within an adversarial network to help refine the generated magnetic resonance data. The adversarial network includes a generator network (the image-to-image neural network) and a discriminator network. The generator network is trained to minimize a loss function based on a Wasserstein distance when generating MR data. The discriminator network is trained to differentiate the motion corrected MR data from motion artifact free MR data.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A method for reducing motion artifact in a magnetic resonance imaging system, the method comprising: scanning a patient by the magnetic resonance imaging system to acquire magnetic resonance data; inputting the magnetic resonance data to a machine learnt generator network configured as a fully convolutional DenseNet, the machine learnt generator network trained as an image-to-image network to generate motion corrected magnetic resonance data given motion corrupted input data; generating, by the machine learnt generator network, first motion corrected magnetic resonance data from the input magnetic resonance data; and displaying the first motion corrected magnetic resonance data as an image. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learnt generator network is trained by: generating, by the machine learnt generator network, second motion corrected magnetic resonance data from motion corrupted magnetic resonance data; determining, using a discriminator network, how likely the second motion corrected magnetic resonance data is motion artifact free magnetic resonance data acquired by the magnetic resonance imaging system or how likely the second motion corrected magnetic resonance data was generated by the machine learnt generator network; and adjusting the machine learnt generator network as a function of the determination. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein how likely is quantified by: generating a value function as a comparison between a first probability distribution of values for the second motion corrected magnetic resonance data with a second probability distribution of values for motion artifact free magnetic resonance data acquired by the magnetic resonance imaging system. 4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the value function is calculated as a function of a Wasserstein distance between the first probability distribution of values and the second probability distribution of values. 5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the discriminator network is a patch discriminator network. 6. The method of claim 2 , wherein the training further comprises: adjusting the discriminator network to make the determination more accurate. 7. The method of claim 2 , wherein adjusting comprises: altering weights of one or more filters of the generator network. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first motion corrupted magnetic resonance data includes one or more motion artifacts. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the one or more motion artifacts include at least motion blurring. 10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: evaluating the magnetic resonance data to determine a level of motion artifacts; wherein magnetic resonance data with low levels of motion artifacts is not input into the machine learnt generator network. 11. A method for training a first neural network to generate motion corrected magnetic resonance data, the method comprising: inputting first motion corrupted magnetic resonance data to the first neural network; generating first motion corrected magnetic resonance data by the first neural network; inputting the first motion corrected magnetic resonance data to a second neural network; evaluating, by the second neural network, the first motion corrected magnetic resonance data as a function of a Wasserstein distance between a first probability distribution of the first motion corrected magnetic resonance data and a second probability distribution of a plurality of ground truth magnetic resonance data; adjusting the first neural network based on the evaluation; inputting second motion corrupted magnetic resonance data to the first neural network; and repeating generating, inputting, scoring, and adjusting until the second neural network is unable to distinguish an input motion corrected magnetic resonance data from an image of the plurality of ground truth magnetic resonance data. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the first neural network is a convolutional DenseNet and the second neural network is a patch network. 13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the first motion corrupted magnetic resonance data includes one or more motion artifacts. 14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the one or more motion artifacts include at least ghosting. 15. A system for motion artifact correction of magnetic resonance images, the system comprising: a magnetic resonance system configured to acquire magnetic resonance data for a patient, wherein the magnetic resonance data includes at least one or more motion artifacts; a generator network configured as a fully convolutional DenseNet trained with a discriminator network configured as a patch discriminator and a critic function based on a Wasserstein distance to generate motion corrected magnetic resonance data when the magnetic resonance data includes one or more motion artifacts, wherein the discriminator network provides feedback to the generator network during training as a function of a Wasserstein distance between probability distributions; a memory configured to store the generator network as trained; and a display configured to display the motion corrected magnetic resonance data from the generator network. 16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more motion artifacts include at least motion blurring. 17. The system of claim 15 , further comprising: a filter configured to evaluate the magnetic resonance data for a level of motion artifacts.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Probabilistic or stochastic networks · CPC title

  • Combinations of networks · CPC title

  • Activation functions · CPC title

  • Generative networks · CPC title

  • Adversarial learning · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US10698063B2 cover?
Systems and methods are provided for correcting motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images. An image-to-image neural network is used to generate motion corrected magnetic resonance data given motion corrupted magnetic resonance data. The image-to-image neural network is coupled within an adversarial network to help refine the generated magnetic resonance data. The adversarial network include…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Siemens Healthcare Gmbh
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G01R33/56509. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jun 30 2020 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 4 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).