Method For Setting Reference Signal In Multi-Cell Based Wireless Communication System and Apparatus Therefor
US-2015304081-A1 · Oct 22, 2015 · US
US10686498B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10686498-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514675449-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 31, 2015 |
| Priority date | Mar 31, 2015 |
| Publication date | Jun 16, 2020 |
| Grant date | Jun 16, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for improved efficiency for massive MIMO adaptation. In an embodiment, method for operating a network component in a massive MIMO network includes obtaining, by the network component, one or more network parameters; determining, by the network component, a number of active antennas in a massive MIMO AP to use for transmitting in one time frame according to the one or more network parameters, the number of active antennas selected being less than a total number of antennas available in the massive MIMO AP; and serving one or more UEs using the determined number of active antennas. Other embodiments reduce the number of beamformers utilized according to network parameters. In still other embodiments, a number of data streams to transmit and a corresponding number of users to be served in a time frame by a massive MIMO AP is reduced.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for operating a network component in a massive multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) network, comprising: grouping, by the network component, a plurality of user equipments (UEs) into a first group of UEs and a second group of UEs based on a first average received signal strength associated with the first group of UEs and a second average received signal strength associated with the second group of UEs; determining, by the network component, a first number of active antennas in a massive MIMO access point (AP) to use for transmitting in a first time frame to maximize a first average downlink (DL) achievable sum-rate according to the first average received signal strength associated with the first group of UEs, the first number of active antennas selected being less than a total number of antennas available in the massive MIMO AP; determining, by the network component, a second number of active antennas in the massive MIMO AP to use for transmitting in a second time frame according to the second average received signal strength, the second average received signal strength being different from the first average received signal strength, wherein the second number of active antennas determined for use in the second time frame is different from the first number of active antennas determined for use in the first time frame; serving only the first group of UEs using the first number of active antennas determined according to the first average received signal strength in the first time frame; and serving only the second group of UEs using the second number of active antennas determined according to the second average received signal strength in the second time frame. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the first number of active antennas comprises determining the first number of active antennas according to the first average received signal strength and network parameters comprising Doppler estimates from the first group of UEs. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the first number of active antennas comprises determining the first number of active antennas according to the first average received signal strength and network parameters comprising a number of users to be served by the massive MIMO AP. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the first number of active antennas comprises determining the first number of active antennas according to the first average received signal strength and network parameters comprising mobility of the first group of UEs. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the first number of active antennas comprises determining the first number of active antennas according to the first average received signal strength and network parameters comprising delays in the massive MIMO network. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the first number of active antennas comprises determining the first number of active antennas according to the first average received signal strength and network parameters comprising large-scale fading coefficients of a channel from the massive MIMO AP to the first group of UEs. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: obtaining channel quality parameters including the first average received signal strength and the second average received signal strength from feedback from the plurality of UEs. 8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: sharing user group descriptions with the first group of UEs; receiving an indication from one of the plurality of UEs that the one of the plurality of UEs should be moved to a different group; and adding the one of the plurality of UEs to the different group. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the network component is the massive MIMO AP. 10. A network component in a massive multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) network comprising: a processor; and a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing programming for execution by the processor, the programming including instructions to: group a plurality of user equipments (UEs) into a first group of UEs and a second group of UEs based on a first average received signal strength associated with the first group of UEs and a second average received signal strength associated with the second group of UEs; determine a first number of active antennas in a massive MIMO access point (AP) to use for transmitting in a first time frame to maximize a first average downlink (DL) achievable sum-rate according to the first average received signal strength associated with the first group of UEs, the first number of active antennas selected being less than a total number of antennas available; determine a second number of active antennas in the massive MIMO AP to use for transmitting in a second time frame according to the second average received signal strength, the second average received signal strength being different from the first average received signal strength, wherein the second number of active antennas determined for use in the second time frame is different from the first number of active antennas determined for use in the first time frame; serve only the first group of UEs using the first number of active antennas determined according to the first average received signal strength in the first time frame; and serve only the second group of UEs using the second number of active antennas determined according to the second average received signal strength in the second time frame. 11. The network component of claim 10 , wherein the programming including instructions to determine the first number of active antennas includes instructions to determine the first number of active antennas according to the first average received signal strength and network parameters comprising Doppler estimates from the first group of UEs. 12. The network component of claim 10 , wherein the programming including instructions to determine the first number of active antennas includes instructions to determine the first number of active antennas according to the first average received signal strength and network parameters comprising a number of users to be served by the massive MIMO AP. 13. The network component of claim 10 , wherein the programming including instructions to determine the first number of active antennas includes instructions to determine the first number of active antennas according to the first average received signal strength and network parameters comprising mobility of the first group of UEs. 14. The network component of claim 10 , wherein the programming including instructions to determine the first number of active antennas includes instructions to determine the first number of active antennas according to the first average received signal strength and network parameters comprising delays in the massive MIMO network. 15. The network component of claim 10 , wherein the programming including instructions to determine the first number of active antennas includes instructions to determine the first number of active antennas according to the first average received signal strength and network parameters comprising large-scale fading coefficients of a channel from the massive MIMO AP to the first group of UEs. 16. The network component of claim 10 , wherein the programming further comprises instructions to: obtain channel quality parameters including the first average received signal strength and the second average received signal strength from feedback from the plurality of UEs. 17. The network component of claim 10 , wherein the programming further co
for beam forming · CPC title
Feedback systems · CPC title
using subgroups of transmit antennas · CPC title
Terminal devices · CPC title
Multi-user MIMO systems · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.