Method for controlling the orientation of a solar tracker based on cartographic models

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10684348-B2
Application number	US-201615739667-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jun 30, 2016
Priority date	Jul 2, 2015
Publication date	Jun 16, 2020
Grant date	Jun 16, 2020

Abstract

A method for controlling the orientation of a single-axis solar tracker orientable about an axis of rotation, the method repetitively completing successive control phases, where each control phase implements the following successive steps:
observing the cloud coverage above the solar tracker; comparing the observed cloud coverage with cloud coverage models stored in a database, each cloud coverage model being associated to an orientation setpoint value of the solar tracker; matching the observed cloud coverage with a cloud coverage model; servo-controlling the orientation of the solar tracker by applying the orientation setpoint value associated to said cloud coverage model retained during step c).

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A controlling method for controlling an orientation of a single-axis solar tracker orientable about an axis of rotation, the controlling method repetitively completing successive control phases, wherein each control phase implements the following steps:
a) observing a cloud coverage above the solar tracker to obtain an observed cloud coverage;
b) comparing the observed cloud coverage with cloud coverage models stored in a database, each cloud coverage model being associated with an orientation setpoint value for the solar tracker;
c) matching the observed cloud coverage with a cloud coverage model; and
d) servo-controlling the orientation of the solar tracker by applying the orientation setpoint value associated to the cloud coverage model retained during step c),
wherein the cloud coverage models include:
at least one zero-cloud coverage model associated with an orientation setpoint value corresponding to a direct inclination angle established by an astronomical calculation of the position of the Sun; and
at least one widespread cloud coverage model associated with an orientation setpoint value corresponding an optimized inclination angle, which does not coincide with the direct inclination angle and which corresponds to an angle associated with a horizontal setting of the solar tracker.

2. The controlling method according to claim 1 , wherein each cloud coverage model is associated with an orientation setpoint value which depends on a composition of a cloud layer of the cloud coverage model, the composition depending on at least one of the following parameters: number of clouds, coverage surface of the cloud(s), thickness of the cloud(s), location of the cloud(s), type of the cloud(s).

3. The controlling method according to claim 1 , wherein, for each cloud coverage model, the corresponding orientation setpoint value is predefined according to at least one of the following parameters: a wear rate of mechanical members of the solar tracker loaded during a change of orientation of the solar tracker, an energy consumption necessary to modify the orientation of the solar tracker, and a displacement speed of the solar tracker during an orientation change.

4. The controlling method according to claim 1 , wherein the cloud coverage models comprise at least one fine cloud coverage model to which an orientation setpoint value is associated on a predefined intermediate angle between the direct inclination angle and an angle corresponding to a horizontal setting of the solar tracker.

5. The controlling method according to claim 1 , wherein the cloud coverage models comprise at least one irregular cloud coverage model to which an orientation setpoint value is associated with the direct inclination angle.

6. The controlling method according to claim 1 , wherein, during step a), the observation of the cloud coverage is translated into a mapping of the solar luminance according to different elevation angles (θi) and, during step b), the cloud coverage models are constituted by cartographic models and the comparison between the observed cloud coverage with the different cloud coverage models is based on a comparison between the distribution of the solar luminance on the mapping with the distribution of the solar luminance in the different cartographic models.

7. The controlling method according to claim 6 ,
wherein, considering a maximum solar luminance value corresponding to a maximum value of the solar luminance accessible during a direct radiation observation:
the zero-cloud coverage model corresponds to a cartographic model wherein the solar luminance is at least equal to 80% of the maximum value within an angular sector lower than 30 degrees around the direct inclination angle; and
the widespread cloud coverage model corresponds to a cartographic model wherein the solar luminance has, within an angular sector greater than 150 degrees, a low value and a high value, with a difference between the low value and the high value which is lower than 50% of the high value, with the high value which is lower than 50% of the maximum value, and with the high value which is associated to an elevation angle deviated by at least 20 degrees from the direct inclination angle.

8. The controlling method according to claim 7 , wherein the cloud coverage models comprise at least one fine cloud coverage model to which an orientation setpoint value is associated on a predefined intermediate angle between the direct inclination angle and an angle corresponding to a horizontal setting of the solar tracker, and
wherein the fine cloud coverage model corresponds to a cartographic model wherein the solar luminance has, within an angular sector larger than 150 degrees, a low value and a high value, with a difference between the low value and the high value which is lower than 50% of the high value, and with the high value which is associated to an elevation angle located at less than 20 degrees from the direct inclination angle.

9. The controlling method according to claim 7 , wherein the cloud coverage models comprise at least one irregular cloud coverage model to which an orientation setpoint value is associated on the direct inclination angle, and
wherein the irregular cloud coverage model corresponds to a cartographic model wherein the solar luminance is at least equal to 50% of the maximum value within an angular sector smaller than 30 degrees around the direct inclination angle, and is at least equal to 20% of the maximum value within an angular sector smaller than 30 degrees around another inclination angle.

10. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the different cloud coverage models include:
at least one zero-cloud coverage model associated with an orientation setpoint value corresponding to a direct inclination angle established by an astronomical calculation of the position of the Sun; and
at least one widespread cloud coverage model associated with another orientation setpoint value corresponding to an optimized inclination angle which does not coincide with the direct inclination angle.

11. The controlling method according to claim 1 , wherein the observation of the cloud coverage is carried out according to any of the following methods:
sky images pickup from a ground by an image pickup apparatus;
measurement of a solar luminance from a ground by a set of several photosensitive cells; and
recovery of satellite images from the sky above the solar tracker.

12. The controlling method according to claim 1 , wherein, during step a), there is implemented a step of frequency weighting applied on the observation which depends on both a frequency response of the observation and on a useful frequency band of a solar collector.

13. The controlling method according to claim 1 , wherein, considering that the method implements a servo-control on a first orientation setpoint value associated to a first cloud coverage model on a first series of several successive control phases, and considering that, subsequently to this first series, the next control phase retains during its step c) a second cloud coverage model associated to a second orientation setpoint value, therefore the controlling method switches into a servo-control on the second orientation setpoint value only if the first series is followed by a second series comprising a predefined number of successive control phases all of them retaining the second cloud coverage model during their respective steps c).

14. The controlling method according to claim 13 , wherein, if the first series is not followed by a second series comprising the predefined number of successive control p

Assignees

• Nextracker Inc

Inventors

• Arliaud Jérôme
• Crucifix Adrien
• Blanc Philippe

Classifications

• G05D3/10 Primary

  without using feedback · CPC title

• G05D3/105

  Solar tracker · CPC title

• H02S40/20

  Optical components · CPC title

• F24S2201/00

  Prediction; Simulation · CPC title

• F24S50/20

  for tracking · CPC title