Process for extruding polypropylene
US-2016145412-A1 · May 26, 2016 · US
US10683408B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10683408-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715796547-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 27, 2017 |
| Priority date | Oct 28, 2016 |
| Publication date | Jun 16, 2020 |
| Grant date | Jun 16, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The BOPP film includes a polypropylene, an absence of a nucleating agent, and an additive blended with the polypropylene forming a polypropylene/additive blend, wherein the additive is potassium stearate.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A process of manufacturing a BOPP film comprising: blending polypropylene with an additive to form a polypropylene/additive blend without adding a nucleating agent, wherein the additive is potassium stearate; casting the polypropylene/additive blend to form a sheet, wherein the sheet consists essentially of the propylene/additive blend wherein the level of crystallinity in the sheet during processing is less than if the additive had not been blended with the polypropylene; and biaxially orienting the sheet to form a thin film. 2. The process of claim 1 , wherein the concentration of potassium stearate in the polypropylene/additive blend is between 100 ppm and 2000 ppm. 3. The process of claim 1 , wherein a speed of crystallization in the process of manufacturing the BOPP film is slower than if the additive had not been blended with the polypropylene. 4. The process of claim 1 wherein the process of manufacturing the BOPP film requires less heat, has a lower induction time, has a higher process speed or a combination thereof than if the additive had not been blended with the polypropylene. 5. The process of claim 1 , wherein a crystallization rate in the thin film during processing is less than if the additive had not been blended with the polypropylene. 6. The process of claim 1 , wherein the haze, gloss 45°, elongation, ultimate tensile, tensile modulus, and WVTR of the thin film are not negatively impacted by the addition of the additive. 7. The process of claim 1 , wherein at any point during the steps of casting the polypropylene/additive blend to form a sheet and biaxially orienting the sheet to form a thin film the crystallinity will be lower than if the additive had not been blended with the polypropylene.
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.