Detecting edge cracks

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10670515-B2
Application number	US-201414892752-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	May 6, 2014
Priority date	May 20, 2013
Publication date	Jun 2, 2020
Grant date	Jun 2, 2020

Abstract

A method and system for detecting edge cracks of an element of a sheet metal product is provided. The method includes calculating a first stress associated with a forming process employing a first die; calculating a second stress associated with a finishing process employing a second die; combining the first stress and the second stress to formulate a total stress; simulating the sheet metal product to produce a benchmark stress; and comparing the total stress and the benchmark stress to determine if the element predictively contains edge cracks.

First claim

We claim:

1. A method, performed on a processor, for detecting edge cracks of an element of a sheet metal product, comprising:
determining one or more edge elements for a first die, wherein the one or more edge elements includes a trim angle parameter and a shear angle parameter;
calculating, using the one or more edge elements for the first die, a first stress associated with a forming process employing the first die;
calculating a second stress associated with a finishing process employing a second die, wherein the second stress is defined as a function of true principle major, minor, and thinning strains of an edge element as derived for the second die;
combining the first stress and the second stress to formulate a total stress;
simulating the sheet metal product to produce a benchmark stress; and
comparing the total stress and the benchmark stress to determine if the element predictively contains edge cracks.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first die is employed to cut the sheet metal product.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the second die is employed to trim the sheet metal product.

4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein calculating the second stress further comprises:
determining the trim angle associated with the second die;
calculating a strain associated with the trim angle and the second die; and
converting the strain into the second stress.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the benchmark stress is obtained by performing a uniaxial test on the sheet metal product.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method is integrated into a computer aided engineering (CAE) program.

7. A method performed on a processor for detecting a crack on a sheet metal via a computer aided simulation, comprising:
performing a formability shell element simulation on a first die to estimate a first manipulation to the sheet metal, the first die being applied to the sheet metal;
demarcating the estimated first manipulation into a plurality of edge elements;
performing a computer aided estimation analysis on each of the plurality of edge elements based on a second die, the second die being applied to the sheet metal, to determine a solid element deviatoric flow stress (SEDFS) for each of the plurality of edge elements wherein each of the plurality of edge elements includes a trim angle parameter and a shear angle parameter;
performing an edge stress analysis to determine the edge element effective flow stress (EFFFS), wherein the EFFFS is defined as a function of true principle major, minor, and thinning strains of an edge element corresponding to the second die;
calculating an edge element total stress (EETS) from the EFFFS and the SEDFS for each of the plurality of edge elements;
calculating an effective stress based on a strain based forming limit diagram for the sheet metal; and
comparing the EETS with the effective stress,
wherein at least one of the steps above is performed on a processor.

8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the comparison further comprises, in response to the EETS being larger than the effective stress, indicating an edge crack of the sheet metal.

9. The method according to claim 7 , the comparison further comprising, in response to the EETS being smaller than the effective stress, indicating that a transformation of the sheet metal associated with the first and second die is safe.

10. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the EFFFS is defined for each of the plurality of edge elements by a major, minor and thinning strain parameter as calculated from the second die applied after the first die.

11. The method according to claim 10 , wherein a characterization of the first die and the second die is stored in a database.

12. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the calculating of the effective stress further comprises:
deriving a uniaxial tension curve for the sheet metal based on the first die and the second die; and
comparing the uniaxial tension curve with the strain based forming limit diagram to derive the effective stress.

Assignees

• Magna Int Inc
• Oetjens Thomas James
• Chartrand Thomas Lome
• Shulkin Boris

Inventors

• Oetjens Thomas James
• Chartrand Thomas Lome
• Shulkin Boris

Classifications

• G01N3/08

  by applying steady tensile or compressive forces (G01N3/28 takes precedence) · CPC title

• G01N19/08 Primary

  Detecting presence of flaws or irregularities · CPC title

• G06F30/20

  Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title

• G06F2113/24

  Sheet material · CPC title

• G06F2111/10

  Numerical modelling · CPC title