Systems and Methods for Distributed Synchronization of Micro-grids with Multiple Points of Interconnection
US-2019103743-A1 · Apr 4, 2019 · US
US10651654B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10651654-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816179805-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 2, 2018 |
| Priority date | Nov 7, 2017 |
| Publication date | May 12, 2020 |
| Grant date | May 12, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A control system is disclosed with a control strategy for autonomous multi-bus hybrid microgrids based on Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Control (FCS-MPC). The control loops are expedited by predicting the future states and determining the optimal control action before switching signals are sent to converters/inverters. The method eliminates PI and PWM components, and offers 1) accurate PV maximum power point tracking (MPPT) and battery charging/discharging control, 2) DC and AC bus voltage/frequency regulation, and 3) precise and flexible power sharing control among multiple DERs.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for controlling a microgrid, comprising: collecting power data from a multi-bus hybrid microgrid, wherein the multi-bus hybrid microgrid comprises at least a converter or an inverter; predicting one or more future states of the microgrid from present and past states of the microgrid; determining a predetermined control action before switching signals are sent to the converter or inverter using Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Control (FCS-MPC) during autonomous mode by switching a circuit breaker at a point of common coupling (PCC), wherein the VSI is a three-phase two-level inverter with three legs and two switches in each leg; and predicting next PV power as: P PV,1 ( k+ 1)= I PV,1 ( k+ 1)· V PV,1 ( k +1) P PV,0 ( k+ 1)= I PV,0 ( k+ 1)· V PV,0 ( k+ 1), where P PV,1 (k+1) and P PV,0 (k+1) are next-step predictions of PV power when a converter switch is “ON” and “OFF”, respectively, I PV,1 (k+1) and I PV,0 (k+1) are next-step predictions of PV current when the converter switch is “ON” and “OFF”, respectively, V PV,1 (k+1) and V PV,0 (k+1) are next-step predictions of PV voltage when the converter switch is “ON” and “OFF”, respectively, and k is a discrete control step sequence. 2. The method of claim 1 , comprising minimizing a cost function before sending control commands to minimize error between an objective and a reference target value. 3. The method of claim 1 , comprising determining the FCS-MPC based on a discrete-time state space of a converter/inverter as: x ( k+ 1)= Ax ( k )+ Bu ( k ) y ( k+ 1)= Cx ( k )+ Du ( k ) where x is the state variable matrix, u is the control input, y is the output, k denotes the present discrete control step sequence, and A, B, C, D are the state-space matrices. 4. The method of claim 1 , comprising a cost function embodies reference values, control actuations, and future states and then minimized subject to certain predefined constraints. 5. The method of claim 1 , comprising a cost function is minimized subject to constraints of: J=f [ x ( k ), u ( k ), . . . , x ( k+N ), u ( k+N )] where J is a control cost and N is the length of predicting horizon. 6. The method of claim 1 , comprising extracting maximum photovoltaic (PV) power using MPPT. 7. The method of claim 1 , comprising determining a maximum power reference (P MPP ) in real time and based on the state space of a converter, a next sample time value of the PV current (I PV (k+1)) and voltage (V PV (k+1)), where T S denotes the sample time, L PV is a total filter inductance of a PV converter, V PV (k) and I PV (k) are present PV voltage and current, V PV (k−1) denotes a previous PV voltage, and k is a discrete control step sequence, further comprising determining: I PV , 1 ( k + 1 ) = I PV ( k ) + T S L PV · V PV ( k ) V PV , 1 ( k + 1 ) = 2 V PV ( k ) - V PV ( k - 1 ) I PV , 0 ( k + 1 ) = I PV ( k ) V PV , 0 ( k + 1 ) = 2 V PV ( k ) - V PV ( k - 1 ) . 8. The method of claim 1 , comprising determining a cost funct
Load forecast, e.g. methods or systems for forecasting future load demand · CPC title
in a bridge configuration · CPC title
Flicker reduction, e.g. compensation of flicker introduced by non-linear load · CPC title
Arrangements for feeding a single network from two or more generators or sources in parallel; Arrangements for feeding already energised networks from additional generators or sources in parallel · CPC title
to the maximum power available from a generator, e.g. from solar cell · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.