Risk measurement driven data protection strategy

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10649857-B2
Application number	US-201715397900-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jan 4, 2017
Priority date	Jan 4, 2017
Publication date	May 12, 2020
Grant date	May 12, 2020

Abstract

Techniques are disclosed for dynamically changing a data protection plan based on a risk score. The risk score is continuously or periodically recalculated based on situational factors that are detected from external modules. The situational factors can include natural phenomena such as weather, fire, and seismic activity. The situational factors can include manmade phenomena such as financial conditions, political stability in the region where the data resides, war, terrorist attacks, and the like. The situational factors are retrieved from one or more external modules. The external modules may be IoT (Internet of Things) modules. The external modules are monitored, and as new data from the external modules becomes available, a risk score for stored data is computed. The risk score is then used to select an appropriate data protection plan.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:
assessing an initial criticality of data stored on a computer system;
computing an initial risk score based on the initial criticality and a plurality of situational factors received from one or more external modules, wherein the one or more external modules includes a web crawler and a seismic activity module comprising a seismic activity sensor, wherein the plurality of situational factors includes a stock activity level and a stock price;
selecting an initial data protection plan based on the initial risk score, wherein the initial risk score is based on the stock activity level being within a predetermined threshold, and the stock price being within a predefined range;
monitoring the one or more external modules, wherein the monitoring includes monitoring the seismic activity module;
computing a new risk score based on detected changes in at least one of the plurality of situational factors as indicated by the seismic activity module, wherein the detected changes comprise detecting a warning time to: an impending earthquake, the stock activity level exceeded the predetermined threshold, and the stock price extended outside the predefined range;
determining that the warning time provides insufficient time for a full back-up before the impending earthquake is to strike;
selecting a different data protection plan based on the new risk score and the determination, wherein the different data protection plan includes backing up to a remote location only critical data; and
backing up critical data to the remote location according to the selected different data protection plan.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein assessing an initial criticality includes receiving an industry category.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein assessing an initial criticality includes receiving a system type category.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein assessing an initial criticality includes receiving a data importance category.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein assessing an initial criticality includes receiving a data activity category.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring the one or more external modules further includes monitoring a temperature module.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring the one or more external modules further includes monitoring a precipitation module.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring the one or more external modules further includes monitoring a fire detection module.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring the one or more external modules further includes monitoring a moisture sensor module.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring the one or more external modules further includes monitoring a financial activity module.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the different data protection plan is selected in response to financial information from the financial activity module.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the financial information includes a stock price.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the financial information includes a stock activity level.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring the one or more external modules further includes monitoring a subset of external modules configured and disposed within a predetermined distance of the computer system.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the different data protection plan includes data mirroring.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the different data protection plan further includes an increased frequency of backups.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the different data protection plan further includes an increased retention period.

Assignees

• IBM
• Int Business Machine Corporation

Inventors

• Banasik Adam
• Gasiorowski Tomasz M
• Jose Daisy Mae L
• Mcgrath Geri D

Classifications

• G06F11/2094

  Redundant storage or storage space (G06F11/2056 takes precedence) · CPC title

• G06F11/2069

  Management of state, configuration or failover · CPC title

• G06F2221/034

  Test or assess a computer or a system · CPC title

• G06F21/577

  Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security · CPC title

• G06F11/1461 Primary

  Backup scheduling policy · CPC title