Regeneration of spent paraffin dehydrogenation catalyst
US-2015111720-A1 · Apr 23, 2015 · US
US10647637B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10647637-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816178413-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 1, 2018 |
| Priority date | Nov 2, 2017 |
| Publication date | May 12, 2020 |
| Grant date | May 12, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Large pill dehydrogenation catalysts and large screens slot width are combined in dehydrogenation units to reduce the pressure drop across the catalyst bed and reactor screens compared to conventional screen and catalyst size combinations. The catalyst has an average pill diameter in the range of 1.6 mm to 3.0 mm, and the slot width of the screen is in the range of about 30% to about 60% of the pill diameter.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A process for dehydrogenation of a hydrocarbon feed comprising: providing a hydrocarbon feed stream comprising at least one paraffin to a dehydrogenation reactor, the reactor comprising a shell containing at least one screen; contacting the feed stream with a catalyst in the reactor under dehydrogenation conditions, the catalyst having an average pill diameter in a range of 1.6 mm to 3.0 mm, and wherein a catalyst-side screen slot width of the at least one screen is in a range of about 30% to about 60% of the pill diameter; and removing an effluent stream comprising at least one olefin from the reactor. 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the slot width is in the range of about 30% to about 40% of the average pill diameter. 3. The process of claim 1 wherein the screen slot width is in the range of about 40% to about 50% of the average pill diameter. 4. The process of claim 1 wherein the relative screen delta pressure drop in the screen slot width range is decreased by about 35-55% compared to a process having screen slot width in the range of about 30% to about 40% of the average pill diameter. 5. The process of claim 1 wherein the screen slot width is in the range of about 50% to about 60% of the average pill diameter. 6. The process of claim 1 wherein the relative screen delta pressure drop in the screen slot width range is decreased by about 50 to 65% compared to a process having screen slot width in the range of about 30% to about 40% of the average pill diameter. 7. The process of claim 1 wherein the relative delta pressure in the catalyst bed is decreased by at least 15% compared to a process using a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm. 8. The process of claim 1 wherein the relative delta pressure in the catalyst bed is decreased by at least 30% compared to a process using a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm. 9. The process of claim 1 wherein the relative delta pressure in the catalyst bed is decreased by at least 45% compared to a process using a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm. 10. The process of claim 1 wherein the relative delta pressure in the catalyst bed is decreased by at least 60% compared to a process using a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm. 11. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst has a higher piece crush strength than a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm. 12. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst has a lower apparent bulk density than a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm. 13. The process of claim 1 , further comprising at least one of: sensing at least one parameter of the process and generating a signal or data from the sensing; generating and transmitting a signal; or generating and transmitting data. 14. A process for dehydrogenation of a hydrocarbon feed comprising: providing a hydrocarbon feed stream comprising at least one paraffin to a dehydrogenation reactor, the reactor comprising a shell containing at least one screen; contacting the feed stream with a catalyst in the reactor under dehydrogenation conditions, the catalyst having an average pill diameter in a range of 1.6 mm to 3.0 mm, and wherein a catalyst-side screen slot width of the at least one screen is in a range of about 30% to about 60% of the pill diameter; removing an effluent stream comprising at least one olefin from the reactor; wherein the relative delta pressure in the catalyst bed is decreased by at least 15% compared to a process using a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm. 15. The process of claim 14 wherein the relative delta pressure in the catalyst bed is decreased by at least 30% compared to a process using a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm. 16. The process of claim 14 wherein the relative delta pressure in the catalyst bed is decreased by at least 60% compared to a process using a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm. 17. The process of claim 14 wherein the relative screen delta pressure drop in the screen slot width range is decreased by about 35-55% compared to a process having screen slot width in the range of about 30% to about 40% of the average pill diameter. 18. The process of claim 14 wherein the relative screen delta pressure drop in the screen slot width range is decreased by about 50 to 65% compared to a process having screen slot width in the range of about 30% to about 40% of the average pill diameter. 19. The process of claim 14 wherein the catalyst has a higher piece crush strength than a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm, or wherein the catalyst has a lower apparent bulk density than a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm, or both. 20. A dehydrogenation reactor comprising: a shell having a feed inlet and an effluent outlet, the shell containing a pair of screens; and a catalyst having an average pill diameter in a range of 1.6 mm to 3.0 mm, and wherein a catalyst-side screen slot width of the pair of screens is in a range of about 30% to about 60% of the pill diameter, wherein the catalyst has a higher piece crush strength than a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm, or wherein the catalyst has a lower apparent bulk density than a catalyst having an average pill diameter of less than 1.6 mm, or both, the catalyst positioned between the pair of screens.
Alumina · CPC title
Particulate material · CPC title
Platinum · CPC title
in a cylindrical annular shaped bed · CPC title
of gallium, indium or thallium · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.