Radiation treatment planning and delivery using collision free regions
US-10166406-B2 · Jan 1, 2019 · US
US10646730B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10646730-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816189807-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 13, 2018 |
| Priority date | Feb 24, 2017 |
| Publication date | May 12, 2020 |
| Grant date | May 12, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Collision free regions are predetermined for one or more class solutions. Each class solution has defined limits for allowed field geometry variations. Collision free regions in planning can be defined as a set of allowed isocenter positions relative to a fixation device. The collision free regions may be visualized by a user to plan for field geometry and isocenter position tradeoffs. Collision free regions in delivery can be defined as a set of allowed couch support coordinates. The treatment fields in a radiation treatment plan can be checked against the collision free regions in delivery to determine whether they will pose any collision risks.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium storing a plurality of instructions that when executed control a computer system to determine a radiation treatment plan for delivering radiation to a patient using an external-beam radiation treatment system, the instructions comprising: receiving one or more class solutions, wherein each class solution includes field geometry limits for one or more treatment axes of the external-beam radiation treatment system and a corresponding collision free region, and wherein the collision free region comprises a three-dimensional space for allowed initial isocenter positions determined based on a delivery machine model and a patient model; receiving a three-dimensional image of the patient; aligning the three-dimensional image of the patient with the collision free regions of the one or more class solutions; receiving a desired initial isocenter position; comparing the desired initial isocenter position with the collision free regions of the one or more class solutions to determine whether the desired initial isocenter position is within at least one collision free region of the one or more class solutions; in response to determining that the desired initial isocenter position is within at least one collision free region of the one or more class solutions, identifying one or more treatment fields within the field geometry limits of the class solution corresponding to the at least one collision free region; and determining the radiation treatment plan using the one or more identified treatment fields. 2. The computer product of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further comprising displaying on a user interface of the computer system the collision free regions of the one or more class solutions and the three-dimensional image of the patient. 3. The computer product of claim 2 , wherein: the collision free regions are defined relative to a model fixation device; the three-dimensional image of the patient is acquired as the patient is fixed to a fixation device, the three-dimensional image including image of the fixation device; and the model fixation device is aligned with the image of the fixation device in a display of the collision free regions and the three-dimensional image of the patient. 4. The computer product of claim 1 , wherein the three-dimensional image of the patient includes image of one or more target volumes within a treatment area of the patient. 5. The computer product of claim 4 , wherein the desired initial isocenter position is input by a user using an input device of a user interface of the computer system. 6. The computer product of claim 4 , wherein the desired initial isocenter position is calculated based on a center of mass of the one or more target volumes or based on a geometrical center point of a smallest box that contains the one or more target volumes. 7. The computer product of claim 1 , wherein: each class solution includes one or more predetermined treatment fields; and in response to determining that the desired initial isocenter position is within a plurality of collision free regions corresponding to a plurality of class solutions, identifying the one or more treatment fields comprises selecting a first class solution among the plurality of class solutions, wherein the first class solution includes an optimal number of predetermined treatment fields among the plurality of class solutions, wherein the one or more identified treatment fields include the predetermined treatment fields of the first class solution. 8. A radiation therapy system comprising: a radiation therapy device including: a rotatable gantry including a treatment head and a multileaf collimator, wherein the multileaf collimator is configured to shape a radiation beam emitted from the treatment head; and a control unit configured to: control rotation of the rotatable gantry; control emission of the radiation beam from the treatment head; and control a shape of the radiation beam via the multileaf collimator; one or more processors communicatively coupled to the radiation therapy device; and the computer product of claim 1 storing the plurality of instructions that when executed control the one or more processors to: identify the radiation treatment plan for delivering the radiation to the patient, wherein the radiation treatment plan includes a control-point sequence and a multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf sequence; and transmit the radiation treatment plan to the control unit of the radiation therapy device to cause the radiation therapy device to deliver the radiation to the patient according to the control-point sequence and the multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf sequence of the radiation treatment plan. 9. A computer product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium storing a plurality of instructions that when executed control a computer system to determine a radiation treatment plan for delivering radiation to a patient using an external-beam radiation treatment system, the instructions comprising: receiving one or more class solutions, wherein each class solution includes field geometry limits for one or more treatment axes of the external-beam radiation treatment system and a corresponding collision free region, and wherein the collision free region comprises a three-dimensional space for allowed initial isocenter positions determined based on a model of a delivery machine and a patient model; receiving a three-dimensional image of the patient; aligning the three-dimensional image of the patient with the collision free regions of the one or more class solutions; receiving a desired initial isocenter position; receiving a user selection of one or more treatment fields of the one or more class solutions; comparing the desired initial isocenter position with the collision free regions of the one or more class solutions to determine whether the desired initial isocenter position is within at least one collision free region of the one or more class solutions; in response to determining that the desired initial isocenter position is within at least one collision free region of the one or more class solutions, identifying a subset of the one or more user-selected treatment fields that are within field geometry limits of the class solution corresponding to the at least one of the collision free regions; and determining the radiation treatment plan using the subset of the one or more user-selected treatment fields. 10. The computer product of claim 9 , wherein identifying the subset of the one or more selected treatment fields comprises: for each respective treatment field of the one or more user-selected treatment fields, determining whether the respective treatment field is within the field geometry limits of the class solution corresponding to the at least one of the collision free regions; upon determining that the respective treatment field is outside the field geometry limits of the class solution corresponding to the at least one of the collision free regions, excluding the respective treatment field from the subset of the one or more user-selected treatment fields; and upon determining that the respective treatment field is within the field geometry limits of the class solution corresponding to the at least one of the collision free regions, including the respective treatment field in the subset of the one or more user-selected treatment fields. 11. The computer product of claim 9 , wherein the instructions further comprising: upon determining that at least one of the one or more user-selected treatment fields is outside the field geometry limits of the c
Rotating beam systems with a specific mechanical construction, e.g. gantries · CPC title
Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods · CPC title
Treatment planning systems · CPC title
Leaf sequencing algorithms · CPC title
using functional images, e.g. PET or MRI · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.