Nonaqueous electrolyte secondary battery and manufacturing method therefor
US-2017309953-A1 · Oct 26, 2017 · US
US10641833B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10641833-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715816198-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 17, 2017 |
| Priority date | Nov 18, 2016 |
| Publication date | May 5, 2020 |
| Grant date | May 5, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method of screening a battery for failure mechanisms is provided. The method may include activating an electrochemical cell. Within 5 minutes to two hours of activating the cell, the open circuit voltage of the cell is measured over a period of time to determine a voltage versus time function. The cell is then screened for the presence of a failure mechanism by checking the voltage versus time function for a failure criteria.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: activating an electrochemical cell; measuring the open circuit voltage of the cell over a period of time to determine a voltage versus time function, wherein the period of time starts after activating the cell; and screening the cell for the presence of a failure mechanism by checking the voltage versus time function for a failure criteria, checking the voltage versus time function for the failure criteria includes calculating a second derivative of the voltage versus time function, and checking the voltage versus time function for the failure criteria includes filtering the second derivative. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein checking the voltage versus time function for the failure criteria further comprises filtering the second derivative using a linear time invariant filter. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the failure criteria is met where the absolute value of the filtered second derivative exceeds 0.15 V/sec 2 at any point in time. 4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the failure criteria is met where the absolute value of the filtered second derivative exceeds 0.19 V/sec 2 at any point in time. 5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the failure criteria is met where the absolute value of the filtered second derivative exceeds 1.0 V/sec 2 at any point in time. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the time period for measuring the open circuit voltage of the cell is at least 20,000 seconds long. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the voltage versus time function is determined by measuring an open circuit voltage of the cell for at least 100 different times between activating the cell and 24 hours after activating the cell. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the failure criteria is met where the absolute value of the second derivative exceeds, at any point in the period of time, three times the one-sigma variation of an average passing sample. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the failure mechanism is a mechanism by which the cell can fail after the screening. 10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the voltage versus time function includes multiple open circuit voltage measurements taken between activating the cell and 24 hours after activating the cell. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the voltage measurements start within 5 minutes of activating the cell. 12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the voltage versus time function results from at least 100 open circuit voltage measurements taken between activating the cell and 24 hours after activating the cell. 13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the failure mechanism is a mechanism that causes cells to short due to the presence of contaminants in the cell. 14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the period of time starts within 5 minutes to two hours after activating the cell. 15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the period of time starts after the cell reaches thermal equilibrium. 16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the electrochemical cell is activated after the cell reaches thermal equilibrium. 17. The method of claim 1 , further comprising charging the cells from a discharge state to a highest operational cell voltage, wherein the open circuit voltage of the cell is measured after initially charging the cells from the discharge state to the highest operational cell voltage. 18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the failure criteria includes the presence of a first order discontinuity in the voltage versus time function.
comprising digital calculation means, e.g. for performing an algorithm · CPC title
Arrangements for measuring battery or accumulator variables (for monitoring G01R31/382) · CPC title
Determining battery ageing or deterioration, e.g. state of health · CPC title
related to manufacture, e.g. testing after manufacture · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.