System for reducing transaction failure
US-12175472-B2 · Dec 24, 2024 · US
US10635985B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10635985-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414521285-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 22, 2014 |
| Priority date | Oct 22, 2013 |
| Publication date | Apr 28, 2020 |
| Grant date | Apr 28, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods, systems and computer program products to measure system re-taskability are disclosed. The methods, systems and computer program products may be used in the design of a new or redesign of an existing System of Systems (SoS). Systems re-tasking (aka substitutability or stand-in redundancy) is the process of using different systems to substitute for non-operational systems to meet required functionality, or using multi-function systems to fulfill higher-priority tasks. This ability can increase the overall operational availability of the SoS; it can also increase the adaptability and resilience of the SoS to unknown or changing conditions. The disclosed methods, systems and computer products include simulating an SoS over time, replacing systems that become non-operational (or damaged) with systems that can fulfill the same capability in order to maximize the SoS availability.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for determining effective system re-taskability of a system and assembling the system, comprising: a) a user defining a problem having a design, functions, and a scenario; b) the user defining possible re-tasking for each function; c) evaluating performance of the system under re-tasking using system of system availability; d) the user redefining the design based on the evaluated performance; e) repeat steps a through d to create one or more designs; f) the user comparing the designs; g) the user selecting a best design wherein the design is a design that meets system of system availability; wherein the system is selected from a group consisting of a military deployment, an electrical grid, a package delivery company, and a supply chain; and wherein system of system availability is determined by the following formula: A SoS = 1 t tot ∑ i = 1 N times Δ t i max j = possible “ success - path ” combinations [ min k = SP requirements ( N operating ❘ operable k , j , i N required k , j , i ) ] . 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluation is determined by possible success paths for inoperability, evaluating system of system availability for each design, and incorporating a success path based on improving system of system availability. 3. A system comprising: a computer; and a non-transitory computer readable storage medium encoded with programming for interactively analyzing system re-taskability, the non-transitory computer readable medium with programming configured, when executed by the computer, to: a) receive an input that defines a problem having a design, functions, and a scenario; b) receive an input that defines possible re-tasking for each function; c) execute a program to evaluate performance of a system under re-tasking using system of system availability; d) receive an input that redefines the design; e) repeat steps a through d to create one or more designs; f) compare the designs; g) wherein a user selects a final system design from the one or more designs based on evaluation of effective system availability; wherein the final system design is selected from a group consisting of a military deployment, an electrical grid, a package delivery company, and a supply chain; and wherein system of system availability is determined by the following formula: A SoS = 1 t tot ∑ i = 1 N times Δ t i max j = possible “ success - path ” combinations [ min
Machine learning · CPC title
Enterprise or organisation modelling · CPC title
Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals · CPC title
Computing arrangements based on specific mathematical models · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.