Textile machine having a plurality of workstations and a method for monitoring a textile machine having a plurality of workstations
US-2020399794-A1 · Dec 24, 2020 · US
US10625977B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10625977-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615294930-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 17, 2016 |
| Priority date | Oct 20, 2015 |
| Publication date | Apr 21, 2020 |
| Grant date | Apr 21, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Systems and methods are provided for detecting potential failures in logging winch systems to enable efficient maintenance are provided. An example of such a system may include a logging winch system that conveys a downhole tool into a wellbore on a cable and a data processing system. The logging winch system may include sensors that measure observed quantities relating to operation of the logging winch system. The data processing system may determine correlation signatures that relate the observed quantities to the operation of the logging winch system and may identify when one or more of the correlation signatures indicates abnormal operation.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method comprising: collecting, into a processor and with a plurality of sensors, a plurality of different parameters relating to operation of a logging winch system that includes a winch, a power pack configured to supply power to the winch, and a logging cabin; computing, using the processor, one or more relationships between the plurality of different parameters using one or more model equations that relate a subset of the different parameters to the operation of the logging winch system; determining, using the processor, a first correlation signature that mathematically describes the computed relationships; identifying, using the processor, whether the first correlation signature falls outside of a threshold indicative of normal operation of the logging winch system; and identifying the logging winch system for maintenance if the first correlation signature exceeds an offset value from the threshold. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of different parameters comprises an observed quantity deriving from at least one of the plurality of sensors of the logging winch system, an estimated quantity that is inferable from the observed quantity but not directly measured by the at least one of the plurality of sensors, a constant quantity that is predefined, or a parameter that is provided by an operator of the logging winch system, or any combination thereof. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first correlation signature comprises an indication of a statistical degree of exactness of the computed relationships. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first correlation signature is determined using principal component analysis or using least squares fitting analysis, or both. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying whether the first correlation signature falls outside of a threshold indicative of normal operation of the logging winch system comprises determining when a set of values of the first correlation signature falls within a defined set of values, wherein the defined set of values indicate a “failure-prone” operation. 6. The method of claim 5 , wherein identifying whether the first correlation signature falls outside of a threshold indicative of normal operation of the logging winch system comprises determining a particular failure mode based on which set of values of the first correlation signature falls within the defined set of values, wherein the defined set of values indicate a “failure-prone” operation. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the failure mode is identified as air, hydraulic, fuel, electrical, or mechanical sub-system of the winch, power pack, or the logging cabin, or any combination thereof. 8. The method of claim 1 , comprising performing the collecting, computing, and determining over time to obtain a plurality of correlation signatures over time, wherein identifying whether the first correlation signature falls outside of a threshold indicative of normal operation of the logging winch system comprises determining when a rate of evolution of the correlation signatures with respect to time, or with respect to any other variable, acquired or estimated, enters a defined set of values indicative of “failure-prone” operation. 9. The method of claim 1 , comprising performing the collecting, computing, and determining over time to obtain a plurality of correlation signatures over time, wherein identifying whether the first correlation signature falls outside of a threshold indicative of normal operation of the logging winch system comprises determining when a linear or non-linear combination of (1) a set of values of the first correlation signature and (2) a rate of evolution of the correlation signatures with respect to time, or with respect to any other variable, acquired or estimated, falls within a defined set of values that have been identified to indicate a “failure-prone” operation. 10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the defined set of values is parameterized using a clustering method in which correlation signatures from other logging winch systems operating in related environmental conditions are clustered and compared. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method is performed in the recited order. 12. A system comprising: a logging winch system configured to convey a downhole tool into a wellbore on a cable, wherein the logging winch system comprises a plurality of sensors configured to measure a variety of observed quantities relating to operation of the logging winch system; and a data processing system configured to determine correlation signatures that relate the variety of observed quantities to the operation of the logging winch system, to identify when one or more of the correlation signatures indicates abnormal operation, and to identify the logging winch system for maintenance when at least one of the one or more correlation signatures exceeds an offset value from a threshold. 13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of sensors of the logging winch system comprises a set of sensors, at least one of which that measures a motor rotational speed of a motor of the logging winch system that has a gearbox ratio and another of which measures a cable speed, and wherein the data processing system is configured to estimate a drum radius of a drum of the logging winch system and to identify abnormal variations in responses between these physical quantities according to the following relationship: Motor Rotational Speed/Gearbox Ratio*Drum Radius˜Cable Speed, where the “˜” sign indicates a linear or non-linear correlation or an offset (+ε), or a combination of both. 14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of sensors of the logging winch system comprises a set of sensors measuring or estimating Pump Rotational Speed, Pump Displacement, Motor Displacement, Motor Rotational Speed of the logging winch system, and wherein the data processing system is configured to identify abnormal variations in responses between these physical quantities according to the following relationship: Pump Displacement*Pump Rotational Speed˜Motor Displacement*Motor Rotational Speed, where the “˜” sign indicates a linear or non-linear correlation or an offset (+ε), or a combination of both. 15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of sensors of the logging winch system comprises a set of sensors measuring or estimating Pump Differential Pressure and Motor Differential Pressure of the logging winch system, and wherein the data processing system is configured to identify abnormal variations in responses between these physical quantities according to the following relationship: Pump Differential Pressure˜Motor Differential Pressure, where the “˜” sign indicates a linear or non-linear correlation or an offset (+ε), or a combination of both. 16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of sensors of the logging winch system comprises a set of sensors measuring or estimating Motor Differential Pressure, Gearbox Ratio, Cable Tension and Drum Radius of the logging winch system, and wherein the data processing system is configured to identify abnormal variations in responses between these physical quantities according to the following relationship: Motor Differential Pressure*Gearbox Ratio˜Cable Tension*Drum Radius, where the “˜” sign indicates a linear or non-linear correlation or an offset (+ε), or a combination of both. 17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the logging winch system comprises a prime mover that comprises an electrical motor or a diesel engine
Warning or safety devices, e.g. automatic fault detectors, stop-motions (safety devices in general F16P; indicating devices in general G08B ){; Quality control of the package} · CPC title
Winding units, specially adapted for drilling operations · CPC title
responsive to excessive tension or irregular operation of apparatus · CPC title
Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass · CPC title
by doing functionality tests · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.