Prioritization of e-mail files for migration
US-2016371285-A1 · Dec 22, 2016 · US
US10600032B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10600032-B2 |
| Application number | US-201815953499-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 16, 2018 |
| Priority date | Jun 18, 2015 |
| Publication date | Mar 24, 2020 |
| Grant date | Mar 24, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
For each of a plurality of e-mail files contained in a first data repository, at least one score for the e-mail file can be determined. Determining the at least one score can include determining whether the e-mail file contains at least one design element and, responsive to determining that the e-mail file contains at least one design element, determining whether the design element is authored by a template developer. A ranking can be assigned to each of the plurality of e-mail files based on the scores. E-mail files having a ranking that at least meets a threshold value can be identified. Migration of the e-mail files having the ranking that at least meets the threshold value to the second data repository can be automatically initiated in response to the user selecting a user interface element.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: for each of a plurality of e-mail files contained in a first data repository, determining at least one score for the e-mail file, determining the at least one score comprising: determining whether the e-mail file contains at least one design element; and responsive to determining that the e-mail file contains at least one design element, determining whether the design element is authored by a template developer; based on scores assigned to the plurality of e-mail files, automatically assigning, using a processor, a ranking to each of the plurality of e-mail files, the ranking assigned to each e-mail file indicating a priority of the e-mail file as a candidate for migration to a second data repository; based on the ranking assigned to each of the plurality of e-mail files, automatically identifying e-mail files having a ranking that at least meets a threshold value; responsive to automatically identifying e-mail files having the ranking that at least meets the threshold value, presenting to a user a selectable user interface element; and responsive to the user selecting the user interface element, automatically initiating migration of the e-mail files having the ranking that at least meets the threshold value to the second data repository. 2. The method of claim 1 , the method further comprising: outputting a listing indicating each of the e-mail files and the ranking assigned to each of e-mail files. 3. The method of claim 1 , the method further comprising: outputting a listing indicating only e-mail files assigned a highest ranking. 4. The method of claim 1 , the method further comprising: outputting a first listing indicating only e-mail files assigned a highest ranking; and outputting a second listing indicating only e-mail files having a next highest ranking. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the at least one score comprises determining a type of the design element and determining the score for the e-mail file based, at least in part, on the determined type of the design element. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the at least one score comprises determining whether the design element is a particular specified design element and determining the score for the e-mail file based, at least in part, on whether the design element is the particular specified design element. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the at least one score comprises determining whether the e-mail file contains a number of personal folders or a number of e-mail rules exceeding a threshold value and determining the score for the e-mail file based, at least in part, on whether the e-mail file contains the number of personal folders or the number of e-mail rules exceeding the threshold value. 8. A system, comprising: a processor programmed to initiate executable operations comprising: for each of a plurality of e-mail files contained in a first data repository, determining at least one score for the e-mail file, determining the at least one score comprising: determining whether the e-mail file contains at least one design element; and responsive to determining that the e-mail file contains at least one design element, determining whether the design element is authored by a template developer; based on scores assigned to the plurality of e-mail files, automatically assigning a ranking to each of the plurality of e-mail files, the ranking assigned to each e-mail file indicating a priority of the e-mail file as a candidate for migration to a second data repository; based on the ranking assigned to each of the plurality of e-mail files, automatically identifying e-mail files having a ranking that at least meets a threshold value; responsive to automatically identifying e-mail files having the ranking that at least meets the threshold value, presenting to a user a selectable user interface element; and responsive to the user selecting the user interface element, automatically initiating migration of the e-mail files having the ranking that at least meets the threshold value to the second data repository. 9. The system of claim 8 , the executable operations further comprising: outputting a listing indicating each of the e-mail files and the ranking assigned to each of e-mail files. 10. The system of claim 8 , the executable operations further comprising: outputting a listing indicating only e-mail files assigned a highest ranking. 11. The system of claim 8 , the executable operations further comprising: outputting a first listing indicating only e-mail files assigned a highest ranking; and outputting a second listing indicating only e-mail files having a next highest ranking. 12. The system of claim 8 , wherein determining the at least one score comprises determining a type of the design element and determining the score for the e-mail file based, at least in part, on the determined type of the design element. 13. The system of claim 8 , wherein determining the at least one score comprises determining whether the design element is a particular specified design element and determining the score for the e-mail file based, at least in part, on whether the design element is the particular specified design element. 14. The system of claim 8 , wherein determining the at least one score comprises determining whether the e-mail file contains a number of personal folders or a number of e-mail rules exceeding a threshold value and determining the score for the e-mail file based, at least in part, on whether the e-mail file contains the number of personal folders or the number of e-mail rules exceeding the threshold value. 15. A computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having program code stored thereon, the program code executable by a processor to perform a method comprising: for each of a plurality of e-mail files contained in a first data repository, determining, by the processor, at least one score for the e-mail file, determining the at least one score comprising: determining whether the e-mail file contains at least one design element; and responsive to determining that the e-mail file contains at least one design element, determining whether the design element is authored by a template developer; based on scores assigned to the plurality of e-mail files, automatically assigning, by the processor, a ranking to each of the plurality of e-mail files, the ranking assigned to each e-mail file indicating a priority of the e-mail file as a candidate for migration to a second data repository; based on the ranking assigned to each of the plurality of e-mail files, automatically identifying, by the processor, e-mail files having a ranking that at least meets a threshold value; responsive to automatically identifying e-mail files having the ranking that at least meets the threshold value, presenting to a user a selectable user interface element; and responsive to the user selecting the user interface element, automatically initiating, by the processor, migration of the e-mail files having the ranking that at least meets the threshold value to the second data repository. 16. The computer program product of claim 15 , the method further comprising: outputting a listing indicating each of the e-mail files and the ranking assigned to each of e-mail files. 17. The computer program product of claim 15 , the method further comprising: outputting a listing indicating only e-mail files assigned a highest ranking. 18. The computer program product of claim 15 , wh
Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing] · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.