Preemptive deployment in software deployment pipelines
US-10146524-B1 · Dec 4, 2018 · US
US10585656B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10585656-B1 |
| Application number | US-201715845129-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Dec 18, 2017 |
| Priority date | Dec 18, 2017 |
| Publication date | Mar 10, 2020 |
| Grant date | Mar 10, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods, systems, and computer-readable media are disclosed herein that facilitate automatically audited software deployment. When a software deployment event is scheduled by a user, an event manager selects and bundles data, properties, and computer readable instructions for the deployment based on a particular client, environment, and/or release packet. At the scheduled time, the event manager automatically triggers deployment of the software via an integration manager, without the need for a software engineer. The event manager monitors the integration manager throughout processing of workflow to deploy software of the release packet. In near real-time, the event manager identifies when a failure occurs, identifies the specific cause of failures in a workflow, and sends the information as an alert to a user. The event manager also facilitates restarting processing of a workflow at a particular failed step.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computerized method comprising: receiving an indication to initiate a workflow based on user input, the user input specifying a client, an environment, and a release packet; automatically identifying, without additional user input, a server corresponding to the client and the environment specified, a programming language corresponding to the environment specified, the workflow corresponding to the release packet specified, and computer-executable instructions encoded in the programming language identified that are specific to at least one of the client, the environment, or the release packet; automatically bundling the release packet, the workflow, and the computer-executable instructions that are specific to at least one of the client, the environment, or the release packet; automatically processing the bundled release packet and the computer-executable instructions according to the workflow in the environment, wherein automatically processing the computer-executable instructions comprises installing, following the multiple steps in the workflow, one or more applications specified in the bundled release packet; and monitoring the automatic processing of the computer-executable instructions in near-real time. 2. The computerized method of claim 1 , wherein automatically identifying the computer-executable instructions that are specific to the at least one of the client, the environment, or the release packet, further comprises: identifying the one or more applications specified in the release packet; identifying a build level for each of the one or more applications specified in the release packet; and identifying one or more properties associated with the one or more applications specified in the release packet; and wherein automatically processing the computer-executable instructions for the workflow in the environment further comprises installing the one or more applications specified in the bundled release packet using the build level for each of the one or more applications and the one or more properties associated with the one or more application. 3. The computerized method of claim 2 , further comprising validating the one or more properties associated with the one or more applications specified in the release packet, wherein validation checks that the one or more properties correspond to a defined data format that is compatible with the environment. 4. The computerized method of claim 2 , further comprising: identifying at least one server in a list of servers, the list of servers specifying a name, the environment, and at least one of the one or more properties associated with each of the servers, and wherein installing the one or more applications specified in the bundled release packet at the at least one server identified in the list of servers utilizes the computer-executable instructions that are specific to the at least one of the client, the environment, or the release packet for the workflow, and wherein the computer-executable instructions are compatible with the environment and the at least one property associated with the at least one server as specified in the list of servers. 5. The computerized method of claim 1 , further comprising: detecting a failure of a step in the workflow that interrupts processing of the workflow; documenting the failure of the step in the workflow in an audit log; and communicating an alert to a user, the alert identifying the detection of the failure of the step in the workflow. 6. The computerized method of claim 5 , further comprising: receiving a request from the user to restart the processing of the workflow; and restarting the processing of the workflow at the step for which the failure was detected based on the request. 7. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media having computer-executable instructions embodied thereon that, when executed, perform a method comprising: receiving an indication to initiate a workflow having multiple steps based on user input, the user input specifying a client, an environment, and a release packet; automatically identifying, by a processor, a server specifically corresponding to the client and the environment specified, a programming language specifically corresponding to the environment specified, the workflow specifically corresponding to the release packet specified, and computer-executable instructions encoded in the identified programming language that are specific to at least one of the client, the environment, or the release packet; automatically bundling the release packet, the workflow, and the computer-executable instructions that are specific to at least one of the computing destination, the programming language, or the release packet; automatically processing the bundled release packet and the computer-executable instructions according to the workflow in the environment, wherein automatically processing the computer-executable instructions comprises installing, following the multiple steps in the workflow, one or more applications specified in the bundled release packet; and monitoring the automatic processing of the bundled release packet and the computer-executable instructions at each of the multiple steps in the workflow to identify when processing of the computer-executable instructions at one or more of the multiple steps in the workflow fails, wherein processing of the computer-executable instructions in the environment continues until processing of the instructions at all of the multiple steps in the workflow is successful or until processing of the computer-executable instructions at one or more of the multiple steps in the workflow fails. 8. The media of claim 7 , wherein automatically identifying, by the processor, the computer-executable instructions that are specific to the at least one of the client, the environment, or the release packet comprises: identifying one or more properties associated with the release packet; and validating the one or more properties associated with the release packet, wherein validation checks that the one or more properties correspond to a defined data format that is compatible with the identified environment. 9. The media of claim 7 , wherein the method further comprises: detecting a failure of at least one of the multiple steps in the workflow that interrupts processing of the workflow; documenting the failure of the at least one step in the workflow in an audit log; communicating an alert to a user, the alert identifying the detection of the failure of the at least one step in the workflow and including a hyperlink to the audit log; and when a request to restart the processing of the workflow is received, restarting the processing of the workflow at the at least one step for which the failure was detected. 10. The media of claim 9 , wherein the method further comprises: identifying the user to which the alert is to be communicated; identifying a role of the user; and based on the role of the user, communicating the alert. 11. The media of claim 7 , wherein the environment is associated with a java-based multiple virtual storage system. 12. The media of claim 7 , wherein the environment is associated with a web application. 13. The media of claim 7 , wherein automatically processing the computer-executable instructions for the workflow in the environment further comprises: installing software to a server, wherein installing software to the server comprises: initiating a drain mode for a first java virtual machine at the server, wherein the drain mode pushes any users to a second java virtual machine at the server; updating the first java
Workflow collaboration or project management · CPC title
Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling · CPC title
Installation · CPC title
Monitoring arrangements specially adapted to the computing system or computing system component being monitored · CPC title
Data logging (G06F11/14, G06F11/2205 take precedence) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.