System and method for providing vehicle collision avoidance at an intersection
US-2019143969-A1 · May 16, 2019 · US
US10576970B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10576970-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816014806-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 21, 2018 |
| Priority date | Jun 23, 2017 |
| Publication date | Mar 3, 2020 |
| Grant date | Mar 3, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method and system are disclosed for assisting the driver of a motor vehicle while driving through an intersection or road junction where at least three roads converge in a transition area. A future motion of an own or ego vehicle is estimated, and a future motion of a second vehicle is estimated. The probability of a collision between the own vehicle and the second vehicle is estimated based on the respective future motions. A search for a roadway marking arranged in the transition area is executed. If a roadway marking is found, the future motion of at least one of the own vehicle and second vehicle is estimated based on the detected roadway marking. A risk-reducing manuever is executed when the estimated collision probability exceeds a limiting value.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for assisting the driver of an ego vehicle traversing a road junction having at least three roads converging in a transition area, the ego vehicle being equipped with an on-board computer and an on-board sensor, wherein the method comprises: evaluating, in the on-board computer, a first path of travel estimated from a future motion of the ego vehicle through the transition area; evaluating, in the on-board computer, a second path of travel estimated from on a future motion of a second vehicle through the transition area; detecting, with the on-board sensor, at least one roadway marking arranged in the transition area; re-evaluating, in the on-board computer, at least one of the first and second paths of travel based on the detected roadway marking; estimating, in the on-board computer, a collision probability for the first path of travel intersecting the second path of travel; executing a risk-reducing maneuver when the collision probability exceeds a threshold value. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the risk-reducing maneuver is selected from a group of potential maneuvers based on the collision probability. 3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the group of potential maneuvers consists of a warning signal in the ego vehicle, an active intervention in the vehicle motion, or a combination thereof. 4. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising interpreting a structure in the transition area as roadway marking when the structure continuously follows a lane for one of the at least three roads. 5. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising determining a relevance of the roadway marking with respect to the ego vehicle and the second vehicle, and re-evaluating, in the on-board computer, at least one of the first and second paths of travel when the relevance of the roadway marking is above a threshold relevance. 6. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising disregarding the roadway marking for re-evaluating the at least one of the first and second paths of travel when the relevance is below a threshold relevance. 7. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising determining if a previous moving direction of the ego vehicle or the second vehicle corresponds to a direction of the roadway marking when determining the relevance of the roadway marking. 8. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising making a selection between discrete driving directions based on a previous motion of the ego vehicle or the second vehicle when estimating the future motion thereof. 9. A driver assistance system for an ego vehicle comprising: at least one sensor configured to detect a motion of the ego vehicle, a motion of a second vehicle and a roadway boundary; and a computer unit onboard the ego vehicle in communication with the at least one sensor and configured to: evaluate a first path of travel estimated from a future motion of the ego vehicle through the transition area; evaluate a second path of travel estimated from on a future motion of a second vehicle through the transition area; detect at least one roadway marking arranged in the transition area; re-evaluate at least one of the first and second paths of travel based on the detected roadway marking; estimate a collision probability for the first path of travel intersecting the second path of travel; and execute a risk-reducing maneuver when the collision probability exceeds a threshold value. 10. The driver assistance system according to claim 9 , wherein the risk-reducing maneuver is selected from a group of potential maneuvers based on the collision probability. 11. The driver assistance system according to claim 10 , wherein the group of potential maneuvers consists of a warning signal in the ego vehicle, an active intervention in the vehicle motion, or a combination thereof. 12. The driver assistance system according to claim 9 , wherein the computer unit is further configured to interpret a structure in the transition area as roadway marking when the structure continuously follows a lane for one of the at least three roads. 13. The driver assistance system according to claim 9 , wherein the computer unit is further configured to determine a relevance of the roadway marking with respect to the ego vehicle and the second vehicle, and re-evaluate at least one of the first and second paths of travel when the relevance of the roadway marking is above a threshold relevance. 14. The driver assistance system according to claim 13 , wherein the computer unit is further configured to disregard the roadway marking for re-evaluating the at least one of the first and second paths of travel when the relevance is below a threshold relevance. 15. The driver assistance system according to claim 13 , wherein the computer unit is further configured to determine if a previous moving direction of the ego vehicle or the second vehicle corresponds to a direction of the roadway marking when determining the relevance of the roadway structure. 16. The driver assistance system according to claim 9 , wherein the computer unit is further configured to make a selection between discrete driving directions based on a previous motion of the ego vehicle or the second vehicle when estimating the future motion thereof.
Spatial relation or speed relative to objects · CPC title
Dynamic objects, e.g. animals, windblown objects · CPC title
the prediction being responsive to traffic or environmental parameters · CPC title
the prediction being responsive to vehicle dynamic parameters · CPC title
Means for informing the driver, warning the driver or prompting a driver intervention · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.