Personalized auditory-somatosensory stimulation to treat tinnitus

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10569082-B2
Application number	US-201715627358-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jun 19, 2017
Priority date	Mar 15, 2013
Publication date	Feb 25, 2020
Grant date	Feb 25, 2020

Abstract

Timed stimulation of both somatosensory system and auditory system is controlled, in such a manner, that an individual's brain activity is altered through spike-timing dependent plasticity, thereby reducing or removing tinnitus.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A computer-implementable method of treating an auditory condition, the method comprising:
identifying, in a bimodal stimulation computing system, bimodal stimulation parameters comprising timing, intervals, and/or ordering of an auditory stimulation signal and a somatosensory stimulation signal, the auditory stimulation signal and the somatosensory stimulation signal forming a bimodal stimulation to be applied to treat a subject, wherein the bimodal stimulation parameters are identified to produce a reduction in an objective measure of neural correlates of the auditory condition in the subject based at least in part on at least two of: tested differences in timing between the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals, tested differences in intervals between the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals, and tested ordering of the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals; and
treating, during a protocol mode, the subject, over a treatment window of time, by applying both the auditory stimulation signal to the auditory system of the subject using an audible signal generator and the somatosensory stimulation signal to the somatosensory system of the subject using a somatosensory signal generator, in accordance with the timing, intervals, and/or ordering of the bimodal stimulation parameters thereby treating the auditory condition of the subject.

2. The computer-implementable method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters comprises:
entering an input mode to determine the bimodal stimulation parameters;
applying, in an input mode, auditory stimulation signals and somatosensory stimulation signals to the subject according to varying parameters;
assessing effects of the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals on the subject as the parameters are varying by measuring a subjective response of the subject during the input mode; and
in response to the assessing, identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters as the timing, intervals, and/or ordering that reduce the auditory condition in the subject treated during the protocol mode.

3. The computer-implementable method of claim 2 , wherein applying, in the input mode, the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals to the subject according to the varying parameters comprises:
adjusting, during the input mode, one or more of a timing, an interval between, and an ordering between the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals.

4. The computer-implementable method of claim 3 , wherein applying, in the input mode, the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals to the subject according to the varying parameters comprises:
applying a course adjustment, during the input mode, to one or more of a timing, an interval between, and an ordering between the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals; and
applying a fine adjustment, during the input mode, to one or more of a timing, an interval between, and an ordering between the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals.

5. The computer-implementable method of claim 3 , wherein the, in response to the assessing, identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters comprises:
identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters as the timing, intervals, and/or ordering that corresponds to a largest subjective response of the subject during the input mode.

6. The computer-implementable method of claim 3 , wherein the, in response to the assessing, identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters comprises:
identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters as further comprising a frequency spectrum, temporal modulation, and an amplitude of the auditory stimulation signal and a frequency and an amplitude of the somatosensory stimulation signal that correspond to a largest subjective response of the subject during the input mode.

7. The computer-implementable method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters comprises:
entering an input mode to determine the bimodal stimulation parameters;
applying, in an input mode, auditory stimulation signals and somatosensory stimulation signals to the subject according to varying parameters;
assessing effects of the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals on the subject as parameters are varying, wherein the assessing is performed by measuring a subjective response of the subject using an electroencephalography test; and
in response to the assessing, identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters as the timing, intervals, and/or ordering that reduce the auditory condition in the subject treated during the protocol mode.

8. The computer-implementable method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters comprises:
entering an input mode to determine the bimodal stimulation parameters;
applying, in an input mode, auditory stimulation signals and somatosensory stimulation signals to the subject according to varying parameters;
assessing effects of the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals on the subject as parameters are varying, wherein the assessing is performed by measuring a responsiveness of the subject using an electroencephalography test and/or using an auditory brainstem response (ABR) test; and
in response to the assessing, identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters as the timing, intervals, and/or ordering that reduce the auditory condition in the subject treated during the protocol mode.

9. The computer-implementable method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters comprises:
entering an input mode to determine the bimodal stimulation parameters;
applying, in an input mode, auditory stimulation signals and somatosensory stimulation signals to the subject according to varying parameters;
assessing effects of the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals on the subject as parameters are varying, wherein the assessing is performed by measuring a subjective response of the subject using a psychophysical tinnitus matching test; and
in response to the assessing, identifying the bimodal stimulation parameters as the timing, intervals, and/or ordering that reduce the auditory condition in the subject treated during the protocol mode.

10. The computer-implementable method of claim 1 , the method further comprising identifying, in the bimodal stimulation computing system, the bimodal stimulation parameters for the timing, the intervals, the ordering, frequency, and/or amplitudes of the auditory stimulation signal and the somatosensory stimulation signal.

11. A system of treating an auditory condition, the system comprising:
a bimodal stimulation system, having a processor and a memory, and configured to:
identify, in the bimodal stimulation system, bimodal stimulation parameters comprising timing, intervals, and/or ordering of an auditory stimulation signal and a somatosensory stimulation signal, the auditory stimulation signal and the somatosensory stimulation signal forming a bimodal stimulation to be applied to treat a subject, wherein the bimodal stimulation parameters are identified to produce a reduction in an objective measure of neural correlates of the auditory condition in the subject based at least in part on at least two of: tested differences in timing between the auditory stimulation signals and the somatosensory stimulation signals, tested differences in intervals between the auditory stimulation

Assignees

• Univ Michigan Regents

Inventors

• Shore Susan
• Martel David
• Koehler Seth

Classifications

• A61F11/00 Primary

  Methods or devices for treatment of the ears or hearing sense (implantable prostheses that substitute or replace internal ear parts, e.g. ear-drums, A61F2/18; methods or devices to cause a change in the state of auditory consciousness A61M21/00; electrotherapy applying electrical stimulation of the auditory system, or circuits therefor A61N1/36; radiotherapy using optical stimulation of the auditory system A61N5/06; electro-acoustic hearing aids H04R25/00); Non-electric hearing aids; Methods or devices for enabling ear patients to achieve auditory perception through physiological senses other than hearing sense; Protective devices for the ears, carried on the body or in the hand (headwear, e.g. caps or helmets, with means for protecting the ears A42B1/0188, A42B3/16) · CPC title

• H04R25/75

  Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception · CPC title

• A61M2021/0072

  with application of electrical currents · CPC title

• A61N1/36036

  of the outer, middle or inner ear · CPC title

• A61M21/02

  for inducing sleep or relaxation, e.g. by direct nerve stimulation, hypnosis, analgesia (for massage A61H; electrotherapy A61N, e.g. applying alternating or intermittent electric currents for producing anaesthesia A61N1/36021) · CPC title