Storage device lifetime monitoring system and storage device lifetime monitoring method thereof
US-2016232450-A1 · Aug 11, 2016 · US
US10558766B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10558766-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615392196-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 28, 2016 |
| Priority date | Dec 31, 2015 |
| Publication date | Feb 11, 2020 |
| Grant date | Feb 11, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A new and/or improved method, apparatus and/or system is disclosed which aids in extending correct behavioral models to include fault modes and in fault mode analysis of components and/or systems in simulated model environments, including, e.g., FMEA and FMECA and diagnostic fault tree generation.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method to predict failure of a system, the method comprising: analyzing the system to identify fault susceptible components of the system; augmenting component models of the of the fault susceptible components with fault modes; using the augmented component models to simulate faults and to determine a system-level severity; applying parameterized physics-of-failure models corresponding to a root cause of the simulated faults to predict a fault likelihood; combining the system-level severity with the predicted fault likelihood to predict component degradations over time; aggregating the predicted component degradations to predict when the system will fail to meet performance requirements; and deriving a fault tree by simulating fault modes with a varying fault amount. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements further comprises using a set of initial conditions, faults and component ages to determine a conditional probability that the system meets a requirement. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements is used to optimize a design of the system or components, or to optimally select among possible subsystem/component options from vendors. 4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the design is optimized by an explicit quantitative Fault Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) obtained by combining the system-level severity of faults with the predicted fault likelihood. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements includes a mean time to failure. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements includes a full probability distribution. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements includes a full probabilistic trajectory of system dynamics. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein a fault mode of the fault modes is a short circuit. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein a fault mode of the fault modes is that a shaft is harder to turn than normal. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of when the system will fail to meet the performance requirements is used to select among possible subsystem/component options. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the fault amount is linked stochastically to system usage. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the fault modes include a worn clutch, and the method further comprises creating a feedback loop that shows how the worn clutch increases a load on an engine to maintain a same velocity for a vehicle. 13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises creating a feedback loop showing how a fault mode of the fault modes affects a variable. 14. An apparatus to predict failure of a system, the apparatus comprising one or more processors configured for: analyzing the system to identify fault susceptible components of the system; augmenting component models of the of the fault susceptible components with fault modes; using the augmented component models to simulate faults and to determine a system-level severity; applying parameterized physics-of-failure models to the simulated faults to predict a fault likelihood; combining the system-level severity with the predicted fault likelihood to predict component degradations over time; and aggregating the predicted component degradations to predict when the system will fail to meet performance requirements; and deriving a fault tree by simulating fault modes with a varying fault amount.
model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model · CPC title
for evaluating statistical data {, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis (forecasting specially adapted for a specific administrative, business or logistic context G06Q10/04)} · CPC title
Reliability or availability analysis · CPC title
Learning or tuning the parameters of a fuzzy system · CPC title
Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.