Method for assessing the controllability of a vehicle

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10540456-B2
Application number	US-201314651079-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Dec 3, 2013
Priority date	Dec 12, 2012
Publication date	Jan 21, 2020
Grant date	Jan 21, 2020

Abstract

The invention relates to a method the assessing the controllability of a vehicle by a driver in a risky or problematic situation. In order to carry out assessment of the controllability of a vehicle early, the following steps are provided: a. modelling the drive train and the movement dynamics of the vehicle, b. modelling situation conditions and environmental conditions, c. selecting a risky or problematic situation, d. selecting a driver capability type, e. modelling the driver's reaction as a function of the selected driver capability type. f. simulating the dynamic vehicle behaviour in the longitudinal and transverse directions of a planned trajectory on the basis of the drive train model and movement dynamics model for the predefined situation and environmental conditions when the selected risky or problematic situation occurs, g. calculating the maximum lateral and longitudinal deviation from the planned trajectory between the occurrence of the risky or problematic situation and the regaining of complete control by the driver, h. evaluating the controllability of the vehicle by the driver in the risky or problematic situation on the basis of the maximum lateral and/or longitudinal deviation.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A method for evaluating the controllability of a vehicle on a processing unit including one or more program modules, characterized by the following steps:
a. modelling the drive train and the driving dynamics of the vehicle;
b. modelling the situational and environmental conditions;
c. selecting at least one driving situation;
d. selecting at least one driver capability type, preferably from the group of inexperienced drivers, average drivers and experienced drivers;
e. modelling the reaction of the driver as a function of the selected driver capability type;
f. simulating the dynamic vehicle behaviour in the longitudinal and transverse directions of a planned trajectory on the basis of the drive train model and driving dynamics model for the predetermined situational and environmental conditions when the selected driving situation occurs, under the assumption of driver intervention with a reaction time which is dependent on the driver capability type;
g. calculating the maximum lateral and longitudinal deviation from the planned trajectory between the occurrence of the driving situation and the regaining of control by the driver;
h. evaluating the controllability of the vehicle by the driver in the driving situation on the basis of the maximum lateral and/or longitudinal deviation of the vehicle from the planned trajectory.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the vehicle is evaluated as controllable for at least the considered driver capability type if the maximum lateral and longitudinal deviations of the vehicle do not exceed defined limit values for the lateral and longitudinal deviation of the vehicle.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the vehicle is evaluated as generally controllable if the maximum lateral and longitudinal deviations of the vehicle for all types of drivers do not exceed defined limit values for the lateral and longitudinal deviation of the vehicle.

4. The method according to claim 2 , wherein a lateral deviation of 0.5 meters outside of the lane of the planned trajectory is defined as the lateral limit value.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein a deviation of 1.5 seconds in the longitudinal direction of the planned trajectory, relating to a planned trajectory point without the occurring driving situation, is defined as the longitudinal limit value.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein for an inexperienced driver a reaction time of 2.3 to 2.8 seconds is used as the basis for the simulation of the dynamic vehicle behaviour.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein for an average driver a reaction time of 1.8 to 2.1 seconds is used as the basis for the simulation of the dynamic vehicle behaviour.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein for an experienced driver a reaction time of 1.5 to 1.8 seconds is used as the basis for the simulation of the dynamic vehicle behaviour.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein a controllability class (C 0 , C 1 , C 2 ) is assigned to each driver capability type.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the lowest controllability class of all simulated driver capability types, which do not result in the loss of vehicle control, is used as the controllability class for hazard and risk assessment.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the vehicle is an electric vehicle.

Assignees

• Avl List Gmbh

Inventors

• Nica Mihai
• Miedl Christian
• Sams Theodor
• Zieher Franz
• Griessnig Gerhard
• Geyer Dirk
• Caizhen Cheng
• Rosenberger Thomas
• Jones Stephen
• BRAUN JüRGEN
• Emre Kural
• Schauer Johannes
• Albrecht Rolf

Classifications

• G09B9/058

  for teaching control of cycles or motorcycles · CPC title

• G01M17/06

  Steering behaviour; Rolling behaviour · CPC title

• B60W2050/0029

  Mathematical model of the driver · CPC title

• B60W2050/0031

  Mathematical model of the vehicle · CPC title

• G01M17/04

  Suspension or damping · CPC title