Robot for preventing interruption while interacting with user
US-12169410-B2 · Dec 17, 2024 · US
US10534424B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10534424-B2 |
| Application number | US-201614986676-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 2, 2016 |
| Priority date | Mar 11, 2011 |
| Publication date | Jan 14, 2020 |
| Grant date | Jan 14, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Dynamically switching cores on a heterogeneous multi-core processing system may be performed by executing program code on a first processing core. Power up of a second processing core may be signaled. A first performance metric of the first processing core executing the program code may be collected. When the first performance metric is better than a previously determined core performance metric, power down of the second processing core may be signaled and execution of the program code may be continued on the first processing core. When the first performance metric is not better than the previously determined core performance metric, execution of the program code may be switched from the first processing core to the second processing core.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. One or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media comprising a plurality of instructions stored thereon that, in response to execution by one or more processors of a computer system, causes the one or more processors to: execute program code on a first processor core of the one or more processors; collect performance metrics of execution of the program code by the first processor core; determine, while the program code is executed on the first processor, a performance of execution of the same program code by a second processor core, wherein the first processor core is of a first type and the second processor core is of a second type different from the first type and wherein to determine the performance of execution of the same program code by the second processor core comprises to apply the performance metrics of the first processor core as an input to a prediction function; and switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is better than a performance of the first processor core or continue execution of the program code with the first processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is not better than the performance of the first processor core. 2. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1 , wherein the first processor core is an in-order processor core and the second processor core is an out-of-order processor core. 3. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1 , wherein the second processor core is an in-order processor core and the first processor core is an out-of-order processor core. 4. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1 , wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core in response to a determination that a threshold value associated with a performance metric has been exceeded. 5. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of instructions further causes the one or more processors to power up the second processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is better than the performance of the first processor core. 6. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1 , wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to transfer context data from the first processor core to the second processor core over a data bus. 7. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1 , wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to transfer context data from the first processor core to the second processor core through a shared memory. 8. The one or more non-transitory, machine-readable storage media of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of instructions further causes the one or more processors to power down the first processor core in response to a switch in execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core. 9. A multi-core processing system comprising an integrated circuit including: a first processor core of a first type to execute program code; a second processor core of a second type different from the first type; and a code distribution module to (i) determine, while the program code is executed on the first processor, a performance of execution of the same program code by the second processor core, wherein to determine the performance of execution of the same program code by the second processor core comprises to apply the performance metrics of the first processor core as an input to a prediction function and (ii) switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is better than a performance of the first processor core or continue execution of the program code with the first processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is not better than the performance of the first processor core. 10. The multi-core processing system of claim 9 , wherein the first processor core is an in-order processor core and the second processor core is an out-of-order processor core. 11. The multi-core processing system of claim 9 , wherein the second processor core is an in-order processor core and the first processor core is an out-of-order processor core. 12. The multi-core processing system of claim 9 , wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core in response to a determination that a threshold value associated with a performance metric has been exceeded. 13. The multi-core processing system of claim 9 , wherein the code distribution module is further to power up the second processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is better than the performance of the first processor core. 14. The multi-core processing system of claim 9 , wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to transfer context data from the first processor core to the second processor core over a data bus. 15. The multi-core processing system of claim 9 , further comprising a shared memory; wherein to switch execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core comprises to transfer context data from the first processor core to the second processor core through the shared memory. 16. The multi-core processing system of claim 9 , wherein the code distribution module is further to power down the first processor core in response to a switch in execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core. 17. A method of multi-core processing, the method comprising: executing program code on a first processor core; collecting performance metrics of execution of the program code by the first processor core; determining, while the program code is executed on the first processor, a performance of execution of the same program code by a second processor core, wherein the first processor core is of a first type and the second processor core is of a second type different from the first type and wherein to determine the performance of execution of the same program code by the second processor core comprises to apply the performance metrics of the first processor core as an input to a prediction function; and switching execution of the program code from the first processor core to the second processor core in response to determining that the performance of the second processor core is better than a performance of the first processor core or continuing execution of the program code with the first processor core in response to a determination that the performance of the second processor core is not better than the performance of the first processor core. 18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the first processor core is
Program loading or initiating (bootstrapping G06F9/4401; security arrangements for program loading or initiating G06F21/57) · CPC title
Monitoring of software · CPC title
Performance criteria · CPC title
for performance assessment · CPC title
the resource being a machine, e.g. CPUs, Servers, Terminals · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.