Method, device and system for determining the fault location of a fault on a line of an electrical energy supply network
US-2017199237-A1 · Jul 13, 2017 · US
US10527666B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10527666-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615356792-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 21, 2016 |
| Priority date | Nov 20, 2015 |
| Publication date | Jan 7, 2020 |
| Grant date | Jan 7, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method determines a fault location in a fault on an electric line. Accordingly first reference voltage values are determined by current and voltage sampled values at a first line end and an impedance of the line. Second reference voltage values are determined by current and voltage sampled values at a second line end and the impedance. Fictitious first reference voltage values are calculated using a wave guiding model, describing the wave response of the line, with the first reference voltage values. The fictitious first reference voltage values, in the fault-free case, correspond to the second reference voltage values at the second line end. Fictitious second reference voltage values are calculated with the second reference voltage values. The fault location is determined by the first and second reference voltage values and the first and second fictitious reference voltage values.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for determining a fault location in a case of a fault on an electric line or a line section of the electric line, which comprises the steps of: determining, using a computer processor, first reference voltage values by means of current and voltage sampled values at a first line end of the electric line or the line section and an impedance of the electric line; determining, using a computer processor, second reference voltage values by means of current and voltage sampled values at a second line end of the electric line or the line section and the impedance of the electric line; calculating, using a computer processor, fictitious first reference voltage values on a basis of a wave guiding model, describing a wave response of the electric line, with the first reference voltage values, the fictitious first reference voltage values, in a fault-free case, corresponding to the second reference voltage values at the second line end and calculating fictitious second reference voltage values with the second reference voltage values, the fictitious second reference voltage values, in the fault-free case, corresponding to the first reference voltage values at the first line end; generating a first fictitious fault voltage signal by forming a difference between the second fictitious reference voltage values and the first reference voltage values; generating a second fictitious fault voltage signal by forming a difference between the first fictitious reference voltage values and the second reference voltage values; subjecting the first and second fictitious fault voltage signals to a cross correlation and a cross correlation function is established; determining the fault location on a basis of a temporal shift of a maximum of the cross correlation function in relation to a mid position in a results window of the cross correlation function; using the determined fault location to locate the fault on the electric line or the line section of the electric line; and further generating a short circuit warning signal indicating a fault on the electric line or the line section of the electric line if a fault is detected. 2. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises determining a propagation time difference value on a basis of the temporal shift of the maximum of the cross correlation function in relation to the mid position in the results window of the cross correlation function, the propagation time difference value specifying a propagation time of a wave of a fault current from the fault location to a respective line end used by the cross correlation function as a reference line end. 3. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises: comparing each of the first and second fictitious fault voltage signals to a voltage threshold; and wherein said further generating step includes generating the short-circuit warning signal indicating a short circuit on the electric line if the first and second fictitious fault voltage signals or at least one thereof reaches or exceeds a voltage threshold, and the first and second fictitious fault voltage signals are only subject to the cross correlation and the cross correlation function is only established if the short-circuit warning signal was generated. 4. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises: determining the first reference voltage values in accordance with: ( U 1=( Ua|Ia·Z ( j ω)), where U1 denotes the first reference voltage values, Ua denotes voltage values from the first line end, Ia denotes current values from the first line end, and Z(jω) denotes the impedance, determining the second reference voltage values in accordance with: U 2=( Uc+Ic·Z ( j ω)), where U2 denotes the second reference voltage values, Uc denotes voltage values from the second line end, and Ic denotes current values from the second line end; calculating the first and second fictitious first reference voltage values, on a basis of the wave guiding model, using the fictitious first reference voltage values in accordance with U 1′= U 1· e j·γ(jω)·l , where U1′ denotes the fictitious first reference voltage values at the first line end, l denotes a line length of the electric line, ω denotes an angular frequency, and γ denotes a wave propagation constant on the electric line; calculating the fictitious second reference voltage values, on a basis of the wave guiding model, using the second reference voltage values in accordance with U 2′= U 2· e j·γ(jω)·l , where U2′ denotes the fictitious second reference voltage values at the second line end; determining the first fictitious fault voltage signal by forming a difference between the second fictitious reference voltage values and the first reference voltage values in accordance with: UFS 1= U 1− U 2′= U 1− U 2· e j·γ(jω)·l , where UFS1 denotes the first fictitious fault voltage signal; and determining the second fictitious fault voltage signal by forming the difference between the first fictitious reference voltage values and the second reference voltage values in accordance with: UFS 2= U 2− U 1′= U 2− U 1· e j·γ(jω)·l , where UFS2 denotes the second fictitious fault voltage signal. 5. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises determining the first and second reference voltage values and/or the first and second fictitious reference voltage values in a frequency domain. 6. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises: calculating a term Ia·Z(jω) in a frequency domain when determining the first reference voltage values by virtue of current Ia at the first line end being multiplied, in a frequency-related manner, by the impedance Z(jω), in a frequency-dependent manner; and calculating a term Ic·Z(jω) in the frequency domain when determining the second reference voltage values by virtue of current Ic at the second line end being multiplied, in a frequency-related manner, by the impedance Z(jω), in a frequency-dependent manner. 7. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises: calculating the fictitious first reference voltage values in a frequency domain by means of the first reference voltage values by virtue of the first reference voltage values being multiplied by function e j·γ(jω)·l in a frequency-related manner; and calculating the fictitious second reference voltage values in the frequency domain by means of the second reference voltage values by virtue of the second reference voltage values being multiplied by the function e j·γ(jω)·l in a frequency-related manner. 8. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises determining at least one of the first and second reference voltage values or the first and second fictitious reference voltage values in a time domain. 9. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises: calculating a term Ia·Z(jω) in a time domain when determining the first reference voltage values by virtue of the current sampled values of a current at the first line end being numerically filtered using a first filter reproducing a response of the impedance Z(jω); and calculating a term Ic·Z(jω) in the time domain when determining the second reference voltage values by virtue of the current sampled values of a current at the second line end being numerically filtered using the first filter or another filter reproducing a response of the impedance Z(jω). 10. The method according to claim 1 , which further comprises: calculating the fictitious first reference voltage values in a time domain by means of the first reference voltage values by virtue of the first reference voltage values being numeric
Aspects of digital computing · CPC title
Testing of lines, cables or conductors (testing of electric windings G01R31/72) · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Testing for short-circuits, leakage current or ground faults · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.