Method and system for risk-adaptive access control of an application action
US-9240996-B1 · Jan 19, 2016 · US
US10511619B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10511619-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715592058-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 10, 2017 |
| Priority date | Dec 17, 2014 |
| Publication date | Dec 17, 2019 |
| Grant date | Dec 17, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Techniques described and suggested herein include various systems and methods for determining risk levels associated with transiting data, and routing portions of the data in accordance with the determined risk levels. For example, a risk analyzer may apply risk classifiers to transiting data to determine overall risk levels of some or all of the transiting data. A traffic router may route transiting data according to determined risk profiles for the data. A sandbox may be implemented to compare, for a given input, expected and observed outputs for a subset of transiting data, so as to determine risk profiles associated with at least the subset.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: selecting, by a computer system connected via a network, a traffic sample of data traversing the network; processing, by the computer system, the traffic sample using a plurality of risk classifiers, by: determining a plurality of attributes of the traffic sample; identifying a corresponding subset of the plurality of risk classifiers for the plurality of attributes; generating, based at least in part on the corresponding subset of risk classifiers, the plurality of attributes, and the traffic sample, a plurality of risk level components that are dependent on outcomes associated with other risk level components generated from other risk classifiers of the plurality of risk classifiers; and combining the plurality of risk level components to generate an overall risk level for the traffic sample; and causing, by the computer system, routing on the network of the data based at least in part on the overall risk level. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the computer system processes a plurality of traffic samples of the data, the plurality of traffic samples including the traffic sample, to generate a plurality of overall risk levels that includes the overall risk level. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the routing is caused based at least in part on the plurality of overall risk levels. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of attributes include at least one of a packet integrity, source reputation, network protocol, destination status, packet content, or a combination thereof. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the traffic sample is a network packet of the data. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the plurality of risk classifiers is associated with another risk classifier in a graph. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the computer system causes a separate network router to route the data. 8. A system, comprising: at least one computing device that implements one or more services that at least: generate a traffic sample from data traversing a network associated with the at least one computing device; select a plurality of attributes of the traffic sample; associate a corresponding plurality of risk classifiers with the plurality of attributes; process the traffic sample using at least a subset of the plurality of risk classifiers to generate a corresponding plurality of risk level components that are dependent on outcomes associated with other risk level components generated from other risk classifiers of the plurality of risk classifiers; and determine an overall risk level for the traffic sample based at least in part on the risk level components. 9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more services further cause routing the data on the network based at least in part on the overall risk level. 10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the one or more services further cause a separate network router on the network to route the data. 11. The system of claim 8 , wherein at least some of the plurality of risk classifiers are interconnected in a graph. 12. The system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more services further omit, based at least in part on a risk level component indicating that the traffic sample is malicious, a risk classifier of the plurality of risk classifiers outside of the subset of the plurality of risk classifiers. 13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the data is transacted using at least a link layer protocol. 14. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon executable instructions that, upon execution by one or more processors of a computer system, cause the computer system to at least: select a plurality of attributes of a traffic sample; associate a corresponding plurality of risk classifiers with the plurality of attributes; process the traffic sample using at least a subset of the plurality of risk classifiers to generate a corresponding plurality of risk level components that are dependent on outcomes associated with other risk level components generated from other risk classifiers of the plurality of risk classifiers; and determine a risk level for the traffic sample based at least in part on the risk level components. 15. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the instructions further cause the computer system to provide, to a separate risk analyzer, a comparison of an expected behavior of the traffic sample and an observed behavior of the traffic sample, so as to train one or more of the plurality of risk classifiers. 16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the instructions further cause the computer system to generate the observed behavior by at least providing an input to the traffic sample using the plurality of attributes. 17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the instructions further cause the computer system to adjust a size of the traffic sample relative to a quantity of data based on a risk profile associated with the data. 18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the instructions further cause the computer system to process the traffic sample in an environment isolated from a destination associated with the traffic sample. 19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the instructions further cause the computer system to process the traffic sample to determine a specific threat associated with the traffic sample.
Routing based on monitoring results · CPC title
Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection · CPC title
Machine learning · CPC title
Vulnerability analysis · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.