Correcting satellite pointing direction

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10509097-B2
Application number	US-201615086357-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Mar 31, 2016
Priority date	Mar 31, 2016
Publication date	Dec 17, 2019
Grant date	Dec 17, 2019

Abstract

Each of a plurality of signal measurement circuits is included in a terminal. Each measurement circuit receives a signal from a transmitter in a satellite and measures characteristics of the signal. A computer is programmed to receive data from the signal measurement circuits. The data indicates characteristics of the signal, including a strength of the signal. The computer determines an initial estimated satellite pointing direction, and generates subsequent estimated satellite pointing directions. For the initial and subsequent estimated pointing directions, the strength of the signal received by each measurement circuit is compared with an expected strength of the signal based on the respective estimated pointing direction. Each subsequent estimate is based at least in part on the comparison of the immediately preceding estimate. Based on the comparisons, the computer estimates a current satellite pointing direction.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A system comprising a computer programmed to:
receive, from each of a plurality of signal measurement circuits, data indicating a strength and a signal-to-noise ratio of a transmission signal received from a satellite by the respective measurement circuit;
set, for each measurement circuit, a weighting function based on the respective signal-to-noise ratio and a distance of the measurement circuit from a respective peak beam gain based on an estimated satellite pointing direction;
compare, for each of a plurality of estimated satellite pointing directions, the strength of the transmission signal received respectively by each measurement circuit with an expected strength of the transmission signal for the respective measurement circuit, the plurality of estimated satellite pointing directions selected based on an iterative gradient descent algorithm;
determine a respective estimation error vector for each estimated satellite pointing direction based on (a) a difference between the strengths of the transmission signal received and the expected strength respectively for each measurement circuit, and (b) the respective weighting function;
determine, based on one of the respective estimation error vectors being less than a predetermined threshold, a current estimated satellite pointing direction;
determine, based on the current estimated satellite pointing direction, a control signal to adjust a satellite pointing direction; and
provide the control signal to the satellite.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of estimated satellite pointing directions includes an initial estimated satellite pointing direction and one or more subsequent estimated satellite pointing directions, and each of the one or more subsequent estimated satellite pointing directions is selected based on the iterative gradient descent algorithm.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the iterative gradient descent algorithm performs a nonlinear iterative least-squares descent to an estimated satellite pointing direction that minimizes a mean squared hypothesis error.

4. The system of claim 2 , wherein the initial estimated satellite pointing direction is based on a target satellite pointing direction for a current time.

5. The system of claim 2 , wherein the initial estimated satellite pointing direction is based on a previously determined satellite pointing direction.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the weighting function is set such that a contribution of a measured signal strength to determining the respective estimation error vector increases as the corresponding signal-to-noise ratio increases.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computer is further programmed to determine the respective estimation error vector from each estimated satellite pointing direction based on measurements from at least 10 measurement circuits.

8. The system of claim 1 , further comprising the satellite, wherein the satellite is programmed to:
adjust, based on the control signal, the pointing direction of the satellite.

9. The system of claim 1 , further comprising the satellite, wherein the satellite is programmed to:
adjust, based on the control signal, a beam direction relative to the satellite.

10. A method comprising:
receiving, by a computer, from each of a plurality of signal measurement circuits, data indicating a strength and a signal-to-noise ratio of a transmission signal received from a satellite by the respective measurement circuit;
setting, for each measurement circuit, a weighting function based on the respective signal-to-noise ratio and a distance of the measurement circuit from a respective peak beam gain based on an estimated satellite point direction;
comparing, for each of a plurality of estimated satellite pointing directions, the strength of the transmission signal received respectively by each measurement circuit with an expected strength of the transmission signal for the respective measurement circuit, the plurality of estimated satellite pointing directions selected based on an iterative gradient descent algorithm;
determining a respective estimation error vector for each estimated satellite pointing direction based on (a) a difference between the strength of the transmission signal received and the expected strength respectively for each measurement circuit, and (b) the respective weighting function;
determining, based on one of the respective estimation error vectors being less than a predetermined threshold, a current estimated satellite pointing direction
determining, based on the current estimated satellite pointing direction, a control signal to adjust a satellite pointing direction; and
providing the control signal to the satellite.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the plurality of estimated satellite pointing directions includes an initial estimated satellite pointing direction and one or more subsequent estimated satellite pointing directions, and each of the one or more subsequent estimated pointing directions is selected based on the iterative gradient descent algorithm.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the iterative gradient descent algorithm performs a nonlinear iterative least-squares descent to an estimated satellite pointing direction that minimizes a mean squared hypothesis error.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the initial estimated satellite pointing direction is based on a target satellite pointing direction for a current time.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the initial estimated satellite pointing direction is based on a previously determined satellite pointing direction.

15. The method of claim 10 , wherein the weighting function is set such that a contribution of a measured signal strength to determining the respective estimation error vector increases as the corresponding signal-to-noise ratio increases.

16. The system of claim 10 , further comprising determining the respective estimation error vector for each estimated satellite pointing direction based on measurements from at least 10 measurement circuits.

17. The system of claim 10 , further comprising:
adjusting, based on the control signal, the pointing direction of the satellite.

18. The system of claim 10 , further comprising:
adjusting, based on the control signal, a beam direction relative to the satellite.

Assignees

• Hughes Network Systems Llc

Inventors

• Vasavada Yash M
• Ravishankar Channasandra
• Roos David

Classifications

• G01S5/0247 Primary

  Determining attitude · CPC title

• H04B7/18513

  Transmission in a satellite or space-based system · CPC title

• H04W16/28

  using beam steering · CPC title

• H04B7/0617

  for beam forming · CPC title

• H04B7/0619

  using feedback from receiving side (feedback signaling for adaptive modulation/coding H04L1/0001) · CPC title