Control of an electronic locking differential
US-9605740-B2 · Mar 28, 2017 · US
US10501082B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10501082-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715804180-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 6, 2017 |
| Priority date | Nov 6, 2017 |
| Publication date | Dec 10, 2019 |
| Grant date | Dec 10, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A vehicle includes an anti-lock braking system (ABS), a stability control system (SCS), and an electronic locking differential. A controller of the vehicle is programmed to unlock the differential in response to activation of the ABS or the SCS. The controller is further programmed to, responsive to the deactivation of the activated one of the ABS and the SCS, inhibit locking of the differential for a predefined period of time.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A vehicle comprising: an anti-lock braking system (ABS); a stability control system (SCS); an electronic locking differential; and a controller programmed to: unlock the differential in response to activation of the ABS or the SCS, and responsive to deactivation of the activated one of the ABS and the SCS, inhibit locking of the differential for a predefined period of time. 2. The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further programmed to, responsive to expiration of the predefined period of time, command locking of the differential. 3. The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further programmed to, responsive to a request to lock the differential and engagement conditions being met, command locking of the differential. 4. The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further programmed to command locking of the differential responsive to a request to lock the differential, engagement conditions being met, and expiration of the predefined period of time. 5. The vehicle of claim 4 , wherein the engagement conditions include a steering angle being less than a threshold. 6. The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the period of time begins when the activated one of the ABS and the SCS is deactivated. 7. The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the period of time is 0.5 to 2 seconds, inclusive. 8. A vehicle comprising: an anti-lock braking system (ABS); a stability control system (SCS); a locking differential including an electronically controlled locker configured to lock the differential; and a controller programmed to, energize the locker to lock the differential in response to (i) vehicle speed being less than a threshold, (ii) accelerator-pedal position being less than a threshold, and (iii) a steering angle being less than a threshold, de-energize the locker to unlock the differential in response to activation of at least one of the ABS and the SCS, and responsive to deactivation of the activated one of the ABS and the SCS, inhibiting energization of the locker for a predefined period of time. 9. The vehicle of claim 8 , wherein the controller is further programmed to, responsive to expiration of the time, re-energize the locker to lock the differential. 10. The vehicle of claim 8 , wherein the controller is further programmed to re-energize the locker to lock the differential in response to (i) expiration of the time, a request to lock the differential, and (iii) engagement conditions being meet. 11. The vehicle of claim 10 , wherein the engagement conditions include steering angle being less than a threshold. 12. The vehicle of claim 8 , wherein the locker includes an electric coil. 13. The vehicle of claim 8 , wherein the period of time begins when the activated one of the ABS and the SCS is deactivated. 14. The vehicle of claim 8 , wherein the period of time is 0.5 to 2 seconds, inclusive. 15. The vehicle of claim 8 further comprising an activation mechanism configured to send a lock-differential signal to the controller, and wherein a driver requests locking of the differential via the activation mechanism. 16. A method of controlling an electronic locking differential, comprising: locking the differential in response to engagement conditions being present; unlocking the differential in response to activation of at least one of an anti-lock braking system (ABS) and a stability control system (SCS); and inhibiting locking of the differential for a predefined period of time that starts in response to deactivation of the activated one of the ABS and the SCS. 17. The method of claim 16 further comprising relocking the differential in response to expiration of the period of time. 18. The method of claim 16 further comprising relocking the differential in response to (i) expiration of the time and (ii) engagement conditions being meet. 19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the engagement conditions include steering angle being less than a threshold. 20. The method of claim 16 , wherein the period of time is 0.5 to 2 seconds, inclusive.
using a linear motor · CPC title
with orbital spur gears · CPC title
characterised by features of the rotating cases · CPC title
using the steering as a control parameter · CPC title
Braking · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.