Label switched path node failure management for label switched paths having refresh interval independent fast reroute facility protection

US10469365B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-10469365-B2
Application numberUS-201414585722-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateDec 30, 2014
Priority dateOct 27, 2014
Publication dateNov 5, 2019
Grant dateNov 5, 2019

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

In one example, techniques of this disclosure may enable a point of local repair (PLR) network device to signal availability of link protection or node protection to a merge point (MP) network device and enable a network device to actively determine whether or not it is a merge point router. Based on whether or not the network device determines it is a MP, the network device may selectively clean up LSP states when there is an upstream link or node failure. The RSVP-TE protocol may be extended to enable a network device to send a tear down message to a downstream router, which may enable the downstream router to conditionally delete locale LSP state information. In some instances, a PLR network device may directly send a tear down message to a MP network device even though the PLR network device may not have a working bypass LSP.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: receiving, by a first network device and from a second network device, a remote pathtear message, wherein the first network device and the second network device are part of a label switched path in a network; responsive to receiving the remote pathtear: determining, by the first network device, whether the first network device is a merge point for the second network device; responsive to determining that the first network device is the merge point for the second network device, removing, by the first network device, path information for the label switched path stored by the first network device; and responsive to determining that the first network device is not a merge point for the second network device, retaining, by the first network device, the path information for the label switched path. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: responsive to determining that the first network device is the merge point for the second network device, sending, by the first network device, to a downstream network device, a pathtear message instructing the downstream network device to remove state information for the label switched path. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the remote pathtear message is a first remote pathtear message, and wherein the second network device is a previous hop network device, the method further comprising: receiving, by the first network device and from a previous previous hop network device, a second remote pathtear message; and responsive to receiving the first remote pathtear message from the previous hop and the second remote pathtear message from the previous previous hop, removing, by the network device, the path information for the label switched path. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second network device is a previous previous hop of the first network device, the method further comprising: receiving, by the first network device, from a previous hop network device, a conditional pathtear message; responsive to receiving the conditional pathtear message, determining, by the first network device, whether the previous hop network device previously indicated node protection was available; and responsive to determining that the previous hop network device previously indicated node protection was available, sending, by the first network device and in a downstream direction, a PATH message indicating that node protection and local protection are no longer available. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the conditional pathtear message signals that a receiving router is not required to immediately and unconditionally delete the path information for the label switched path. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second network device is a previous previous hop of the first network device, the method further comprising: receiving, by the first network device, from a previous hop network device, a conditional pathtear message, wherein removing the path information for the label switched path stored by the first network device is further responsive to receiving the conditional pathtear message. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second network device is a previous previous hop of the first network device, and wherein the first network device does not support enhanced facility protection, the method further comprising: receiving, by the first network device, from a previous hop network device, a conditional pathtear message, wherein the conditional pathtear message includes an object defining the conditional pathtear message as being of a conditional pathtear message type; discarding, by the first network device, the object included in the conditional pathtear message; and processing, by the first network device, the conditional pathtear message as a pathtear message by at least: removing, by the first network device, the path information for label switched path stored by the first network device; and sending, by the first network device and to a downstream network device, a pathtear message instructing the downstream network device to remove state information for the label switched path. 8. A first network device comprising: one or more network interface cards; and a control unit configured to: receive, from a second network device and using at least one of the one or more network interface cards, a remote pathtear message, wherein the first network device and the second network device are part of a label switched path in a network; determine whether the first network device is a merge point for the second network device; responsive to determining that the first network device is the merge point for the second network device, remove path information for the label switched path stored by the first network device; and responsive to determining that the first network device is not a merge point for the second network device, retain, by the first network device, the path information for the label switched path. 9. The first network device of claim 8 , wherein the control unit is configured to, responsive to determining that the first network device is the merge point for the second network device, send, to a downstream network device and using at least one of the one or more network interface cards, a pathtear message instructing the downstream network device to remove state information for the label switched path. 10. The first network device of claim 8 , wherein the remote pathtear message is a first remote pathtear message, wherein the second network device is a previous hop network device, and wherein the control unit is configured to: receive, from a previous previous hop network device and using at least one of the one or more network interface cards, a second remote pathtear message; and responsive to receiving the first remote pathtear message from the previous hop and the second remote pathtear message from the previous previous hop, remove the path information for the label switched path. 11. The first network device of claim 8 , wherein the second network device is a previous previous hop of the first network device, and wherein the control unit is further configured to: receive, from a previous hop network device, a conditional pathtear message; responsive to receiving the conditional pathtear message, determine whether the previous hop network device previous indicated node protection was available; and responsive to determining that the previous hop network device previously indicated node protection was available, send, in a downstream direction, a PATH message indicating that node protection and local protection are no longer available. 12. The first network device of claim 8 , wherein the second network device is a previous previous hop of the first network device, and wherein the control unit is further configured to: receive, from a previous hop network device, a conditional pathtear message; and remove the path information for the label switched path stored by the first network device further in response to receiving the conditional pathtear message. 13. The first network device of claim 8 , wherein the second network device is a previous previous hop of the first network device, wherein the first network device does not support enhanced facility protection, and wherein the control unit is further configured to: receive, from a previous hop network device, a conditional pathtear message, wherein the conditional pathtear message includes an object defining the conditional pathtear message as being of a conditional pathtear message type; discard the object included in the conditional pathtear message; and process the condi

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • using network fault recovery (ring fault isolation or reconfiguration in loop networks without recovery actions by a network management system H04L12/437) · CPC title

  • using reservation actions during connection setup · CPC title

  • H04L45/28Primary

    using route fault recovery · CPC title

  • using label swapping, e.g. multi-protocol label switch [MPLS] · CPC title

  • by dynamic selection of recovery network elements, e.g. replacement by the most appropriate element after failure · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US10469365B2 cover?
In one example, techniques of this disclosure may enable a point of local repair (PLR) network device to signal availability of link protection or node protection to a merge point (MP) network device and enable a network device to actively determine whether or not it is a merge point router. Based on whether or not the network device determines it is a MP, the network device may selectively cle…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Juniper Networks Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification H04L45/28. Mapped technology areas include Electricity.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Nov 05 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 12 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).