Method for simulating extreme or defective solenoid valves for demonstrating the failure effect and for detecting faults in order to certify a vehicle diagnosis system

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10458566-B2
Application number	US-201615548297-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jan 26, 2016
Priority date	Feb 26, 2015
Publication date	Oct 29, 2019
Grant date	Oct 29, 2019

Abstract

A method for simulating malfunctioning solenoid valves is disclosed. A current flows through a solenoid valve in order to achieve opening and closing. The closing is forced after the current supplied to the solenoid valve is activated at an activation time, and the opening is forced after the current is deactivated. The current is applied with a charging current strength before activation for a charging phase, and after activation, the current is increased to peak current strength and subsequently reduced to a holding current strength. The current strength is reduced to a deactivation current strength, after which the current strength increases again. A variation of the value or duration of the current strength or an application of an additional magnetic force is used to simulate a premature activation, a delayed activation, a premature deactivation, or a delayed deactivation.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A method for simulating malfunctioning solenoid valves for an internal combustion engine by influencing an activation time and a deactivation time of the solenoid valve, the method comprising:
energizing the solenoid valve with current of a predetermined, variable current strength for realizing opening and closing processes;
forcing the closing process after activation of a current feed to the solenoid valve at an activation point in time, and forcing the opening process after a deactivation of the current feed to the solenoid valve at a deactivation point in time;
before the activation point in time, applying the current with a charging current strength for a duration of a charging phase and starting from the activation point in time, increasing the current to a peak current strength and then reducing the current to a holding current strength; and
starting from the deactivation point in time, further reducing the current strength to a deactivation current strength,
wherein after a time offset, the current strength increases again due to inductance, and using at least one of a variation of a magnitude, a duration of the current strength, or application of an additional magnetic force for simulating at least one of an advanced activation, a retarded activation, an advanced deactivation, or a retarded deactivation.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein for simulating the advanced activation, at least one of the peak current strength is increased, the charging current strength is increased, or the charging phase is lengthened.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein for simulating the retarded activation, at least one of the peak current strength is reduced, the charging current strength is reduced, or the charging phase is shortened.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein for simulating the advanced deactivation, a magnetic field generated by the additional magnetic force has an opposite polarity than a magnetic field generated by a primary coil.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein for simulating the retarded deactivation, at least one of the holding current strength is increased or a time offset between the deactivation point in time and an inductively caused increase of the current strength is shortened.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the additional magnetic force is provided by a permanent magnet or an additional coil that carries an electric current.

7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the permanent magnet connects axially to an element of the solenoid valve to be moved or the additional coil surrounds a primary coil provided for shifting the element to be moved.

8. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the permanent magnet is mounted on a housing of the solenoid valve.

9. The method according to claim 6 , wherein for simulating the advanced activation and for simulating the retarded deactivation, the permanent magnet is applied so that a magnetic field generated thereby has a same polarity as a magnetic field generated by a primary coil or for simulating the retarded activation and for simulating the advanced deactivation, the permanent magnet is applied so that the magnetic field generated thereby has an opposite polarity as the magnetic field generated by the primary coil.

10. The method according to claim 6 , wherein for simulating the advanced activation and for simulating the retarded deactivation, a magnetic field generated by the additional coil has a same polarity as a magnetic field generated by a primary coil or for simulating the retarded activation and for simulating the advanced deactivation, the magnetic field generated by the additional coil has an opposite polarity as the magnetic field generated by the primary coil.

Assignees

• Schaeffler Technologies Ag

Inventors

• Traversa Piergiacomo
• Pedersen Gerulf

Classifications

• F02M51/0621 Primary

  acting on one mobile armature (F02M51/0628 takes precedence) · CPC title

• F02D2041/2034

  Control of the current gradient · CPC title

• F02D2041/2044

  using pre-magnetisation or post-magnetisation of the coils · CPC title

• F02D2041/2017

  using means for creating a boost current or using reference switching · CPC title

• F02D2041/2055

  with means for determining actual opening or closing time · CPC title