Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10456204-B2
Application number	US-201615134290-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Apr 20, 2016
Priority date	Dec 18, 2007
Publication date	Oct 29, 2019
Grant date	Oct 29, 2019

Abstract

Methods of manufacturing a custom arthroplasty resection guide or jig are disclosed herein. For example, one method may include: generating MRI knee coil two dimensional images, wherein the knee coil images include a knee region of a patient; generating MRI body coil two dimensional images, wherein the body coil images include a hip region of the patient, the knee region of the patient and an ankle region of the patient; in the knee coil images, identifying first locations of knee landmarks; in the body coil images, identifying second locations of the knee landmarks; run a transformation with the first and second locations, causing the knee coil images and body coil images to generally correspond with each other with respect to location and orientation.

First claim

We claim:

1. A method of preoperatively planning an arthroplasty on a joint, the method comprising:
receiving medical images of a first patient joint and a second patient joint spaced apart from the first patient joint, the medical images of the first patient joint being of a different resolution than a resolution of the medical images of the second patient joint;
generating a computer model of the first patient joint from the medical images of the first patient joint;
locating a joint center of the second patient joint from the medical images of the second patient joint, the joint center being located relative to the computer model in a computerized coordinate system; and
superimposing a computerized representation of an implant with the computer model to determine coordinate locations in the computerized coordinate system for an arthroplasty resection relative to the computer model of the first patient joint and the joint center of the second patient joint.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the medical images of the first patient joint are a higher resolution than the resolution of the medical images of the second patient joint.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the medical images include a third patient joint spaced apart from the first patient joint and the second patient joint, the medical images of the third patient joint being of a different resolution than the resolution of the first medical images,
the method further comprising locating a joint center of the third patient joint from the medical images of the third patient joint, wherein the computer model and the joints centers of the second patient joint and the third patient joint are located relative to each other in the computerized coordinate system.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the first patient joint, second patient joint, and third patient joint are respectively a knee, hip and ankle.

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising determining a full leg mechanical axis defined between the joint centers of the second patient joint and the third patient joint.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the determined coordinate locations for the arthroplasty resection includes a zero degree mechanical axis alignment relative to the full leg mechanical axis.

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein the first patient joint and second patient joint are respectively a knee and a hip.

8. The method of claim 2 , further comprising providing to a computerized cutting machine data pertaining to the coordinate locations in the computerized coordinate system for the arthroplasty resection.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the computerized cutting machine is a CNC machine.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the computerized cutting machine uses the data to cut a resection guide in a jig blank being machined into an arthroplasty jig.

11. The method of claim 2 , wherein the medical images of the first and second patient joints are oriented relative to each other in the computerized coordinate system in an arrangement simulating the medical images of the first and second patient joints being taken as a single image scan as opposed to two spaced-apart image scans.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the medical images of the first and second patient joints are oriented relative to each other by using a transformation to positionally match locations of anatomical landmarks in the medical images of the first patient joint to locations of the anatomical landmarks in additional medical images of the first patient joint, the additional medical images of the first patient joint having the lower resolution.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the transformation comprises an Iterative Closest Point algorithm or gradient descent optimization.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the transformation causes the medical images of the first patient joint to reposition in the computer global coordinate system to match the location and orientation of the additional medical images of the first patient joint.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein the anatomical landmarks comprise at least one of a center of a femur condyle region near a trochlear groove, a point of a medial femur epicondyle, or a lateral point of a lateral femur epicondyle.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the point of the medial femur epicondyle is a most medial point of the medial femur epicondyle.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the point of the lateral femur epicondyle is a most lateral point of the lateral femur epicondyle.

18. The method of claim 12 , wherein the anatomical landmarks comprise at least one of a medial edge of a medial tibial condyle, a lateral edge of a lateral tibial condyle, a medial transition from a medial tibial plateau to a tibial shaft, or a lateral transition from a lateral tibial plateau to the tibial shaft.

19. The method of claim 2 , wherein the medical images of the first and second patient joints are the result of respective spaced-apart imaging scans and oriented in the computerized coordinate system as if the medical images of the first and second patient joints were generated via a single imaging scan that encompassed a knee region and at least one of a hip or ankle region at the same time.

20. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computerized representation of the implant comprises a computerized three dimensional model of the implant.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein the implant comprises at least one of a femoral knee implant or a tibial knee implant, and the computer model comprises at least one of a femur knee region or a tibia knee region.

22. The method of claim 2 , wherein the medical images are generated via at least one of CT, MRI or other medical imaging methods.

Assignees

• Howmedica Osteonics Corp

Inventors

• Park Ilwhan
• Song keun
• Mishin Oleg
• Santarella Michael

Classifications

• G06F18/22

  Matching criteria, e.g. proximity measures · CPC title

• A61B17/122

  Clamps or clips, e.g. for the umbilical cord {(for the vas deferens A61F6/206)} · CPC title

• G06V10/751

  Comparing pixel values or logical combinations thereof, or feature values having positional relevance, e.g. template matching · CPC title

• G06T2219/008

  Cut plane or projection plane definition · CPC title

• B33Y80/00

  Products made by additive manufacturing · CPC title