Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10456203-B2
Application number	US-201615134224-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Apr 20, 2016
Priority date	Dec 18, 2007
Publication date	Oct 29, 2019
Grant date	Oct 29, 2019

Abstract

Methods of manufacturing a custom arthroplasty resection guide or jig are disclosed herein. For example, one method may include: generating MRI knee coil two dimensional images, wherein the knee coil images include a knee region of a patient; generating MRI body coil two dimensional images, wherein the body coil images include a hip region of the patient, the knee region of the patient and an ankle region of the patient; in the knee coil images, identifying first locations of knee landmarks; in the body coil images, identifying second locations of the knee landmarks; run a transformation with the first and second locations, causing the knee coil images and body coil images to generally correspond with each other with respect to location and orientation.

First claim

We claim:

1. A method of preoperatively planning an arthroplasty on a knee, the method comprising:
a) identify in a computerized coordinate system anatomical landmarks in first medical images of a first resolution, the first medical images being of a knee region including the knee, the anatomical landmarks being in the knee region;
b) identify in the computerized coordinate system the anatomical landmarks in second medical images of a second resolution that is different than the first resolution, the second medical images including at least one of the knee region, an ankle or a hip;
c) merge the first and second medical images by positionally matching in the computerized coordinate system the anatomical landmarks in the first medical images and the anatomical landmarks in the second medical images; and
d) determining in the computerized coordinate system an arthroplasty resection relative to anatomical information resulting from the merged first and second medical images, wherein step d) comprises applying a computerized representation of an implant to the anatomical information resulting from the first medical images of the merged first and second medical images.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computerized representation comprises a three dimensional computer model of the implant.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the anatomical information comprises a computerized three dimensional bone model generated from the first medical images of the merged first and second medical images.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the implant comprises at least one of a femoral knee implant or a tibial knee implant.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anatomical information comprises identified hip, ankle and knee centers in the merged first and second medical images.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the anatomical information further comprises at least one mechanical axis defined from any two or more of the hip, ankle and knee centers and step d) comprises determining a desired orientation of the arthroplasty resection relative to the at least one mechanical axis.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the desired orientation is a zero degree mechanical axis orientation.

8. The method of claim 5 , wherein the hip and ankle centers are identified in the second medical images of the merged first and second medical images.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the medical images are generated via at least one of MRI, CT or other medical imaging methods.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising sending data to a computer guided cutting machine, the data including orientation and location information for the arthroplasty resection.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein step c) comprises running via a computer a transformation in the process of positionally matching the anatomical landmarks in the first medical images and the second medical images.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the transformation comprises an Iterative Closest Point algorithm or gradient descent optimization.

13. A method of preoperatively planning an arthroplasty on a knee, the method comprising:
a) identify in a computerized coordinate system anatomical landmarks in first medical images of a first resolution, the first medical images being of a knee region including the knee, the anatomical landmarks being in the knee region;
b) identify in the computerized coordinate system the anatomical landmarks in second medical images of a second resolution that is different than the first resolution, the second medical images including at least one of the knee region, an ankle or a hip;
c) merge the first and second medical images by positionally matching in the computerized coordinate system the anatomical landmarks in the first medical images and the anatomical landmarks in the second medical images;
d) determining in the computerized coordinate system an arthroplasty resection relative to anatomical information resulting from the merged first and second medical images; and
e) performing a joint analysis wherein a computerized three dimensional bone model positioned in the computerized coordinate system is manipulated to adjust a joint gap of the computerized three dimensional bone model, the computerized three dimensional bone model having been generated from the first medical images.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the joint gap is adjusted such that a medial joint gap is equal to a lateral joint gap.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anatomical landmarks comprise at least one of a center of a femur condyle region near a trochlear groove, a point of a medial femur epicondyle, or a point of a lateral femur epicondyle.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the point of the medial femur epicondyle is a most medial point of the medial femur epicondyle.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the point of the lateral femur epicondyle is a most lateral point of the lateral femur epicondyle.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anatomical landmarks comprise at least one a medial edge of a medial tibial condyle, a lateral edge of a lateral tibial condyle, a medial transition from a medial tibial plateau to a tibial shaft, or a lateral transition from a lateral tibial plateau to the tibial shaft.

19. A method of preoperatively planning an arthroplasty on a knee, the method comprising:
a) identify in a computerized coordinate system anatomical landmarks in first medical images of a first resolution, the first medical images being of a knee region including the knee, the anatomical landmarks being in the knee region;
b) identify in the computerized coordinate system the anatomical landmarks in second medical images of a second resolution that is different than the first resolution, the second medical images including at least one of the knee region, an ankle or a hip;
c) merge the first and second medical images by positionally matching in the computerized coordinate system the anatomical landmarks in the first medical images and the anatomical landmarks in the second medical images;
d) determining in the computerized coordinate system an arthroplasty resection relative to anatomical information resulting from the merged first and second medical images; and
e) determining in the computerized coordinate system a hole relative to the anatomical information resulting from the merged first and second medical images.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein determining in the computerized coordinate system the hole comprises applying the computerized representation of the implant to the anatomical information resulting from the first medical images of the merged first and second medical images.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein the computerized representation comprises a computerized three dimensional model of the implant.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the anatomical information comprises a computerized three dimensional bone model generated from the first medical images of the merged first and second medical images.

23. The method of claim 21 , wherein the implant comprises at least one of a femoral knee implant or a tibial knee implant.

24. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second resolution is lower than the first resolution.

25. The method of claim 13 , wherein the second resolution is lower than the first resolution.

26. The method of claim 19 , wherein the second resolution is lower than the first resolution.

Assignees

• Howmedica Osteonics Corp

Inventors

• Park Ilwhan
• Song keun
• Mishin Oleg
• Santarella Michael

Classifications

• G06F18/22

  Matching criteria, e.g. proximity measures · CPC title

• A61B17/122

  Clamps or clips, e.g. for the umbilical cord {(for the vas deferens A61F6/206)} · CPC title

• G06V10/751

  Comparing pixel values or logical combinations thereof, or feature values having positional relevance, e.g. template matching · CPC title

• A61B2034/102

  Modelling of surgical devices, implants or prosthesis · CPC title

• A61F2/389

  Tibial components (A61F2/3868 takes precedence) · CPC title