Real-time bidding system and methods thereof for achieving optimum cost per engagement

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-10453100-B2
Application number	US-201414565197-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Dec 9, 2014
Priority date	Aug 26, 2014
Publication date	Oct 22, 2019
Grant date	Oct 22, 2019

Abstract

Systems and methods are disclosed for optimizing an online advertising campaign both before the campaign begins, and dynamically during the campaign. Optimizations are performed comparatively between a plurality of MPs (Media Properties) based on their relative cost-per-engagement. Comparisons are performed by first stack ranking MP inventory including any of sites, feeds, and verticals, based on cost per engagement. Once ranked, scores are assigned to the targeted inventory and a mean score is determined. Then, the inventory is rated as high, normal, or low impact based on their scores compared with the mean and a standard deviation for all scores. Higher impact sites with scores at least a standard deviation above the mean are initially favored, and the MP targeting strategy is dynamically adjusted during the campaign based on periodically re-evaluating the MP rankings, frequencies of engagement, and campaign progress relative to fulfillment in an allotted run time.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. In a digital medium environment of real-time bidding and selection of advertisement opportunities corresponding to viewers simultaneously accessing websites via computing devices, a computerized method for determining an efficient bidding strategy for an online advertising campaign, comprising:
accumulating over a plurality of online advertising auctions a historical database including at least a cost per engagement for each of a plurality of media properties;
analyzing the historical database including at least the cost per engagement for each of the plurality of media properties to determine a ranking order for the plurality of media properties;
assigning a score for each media property with respect to at least its historical cost per engagement;
determining a mean score for all analyzed media properties;
rating each media property to determine an impact level by comparing the score for each media property with respect to the mean score;
determining a set of media properties to be targeted for the online advertising campaign based on the impact level of each media property;
allocating a number of bids for bidding on advertising impression opportunities to a first media property comprising a higher impact level compared to the other available media properties;
executing the online advertising campaign in real-time by placing bids for the first media property based on the allocated number of bids; and
during execution of the online advertising campaign:
determining a first probability of reaching a threshold number of engagements during a prescribed run time of the online advertising campaign for the first media property; and
upon determining that a second media property comprises a second probability of reaching the threshold number of engagements during the prescribed run time of the online advertising campaign that is higher than the first probability:
allocating a portion of the allocated number of bids from the first media property to the second media property; and
placing bids for the second media property based on the portion of the allocated number of bids from the first media property to the second media property.

2. The computerized method of claim 1 wherein rating each media property to determine the impact level by comparing the score for each media property with respect to the mean score further comprises:
determining a standard deviation value with respect to the mean score and the scores for two or more of the media properties; and
rating each media property to determine the impact level by comparing the score for each media property with the mean score and the standard deviation value.

3. The computerized method of claim 2 further comprising rating a media property with a score more than one standard deviation value above the mean score with a higher impact level.

4. The computerized method of claim 2 further comprising rating a media property with a score within one standard deviation value of the mean score with a normal impact level.

5. The computerized method of claim 2 further comprising rating a media property with a score more than one standard deviation value below the mean score with a lower impact level.

6. The computerized method of claim 1 wherein the historical database also includes an engagement rate for how frequently an engagement has occurred for each media property to determine a probability of reaching the threshold number of engagements during the prescribed run time of the online advertising campaign for each media property.

7. The computerized method of claim 1 further comprising allocating the portion of the allocated number of bids from the first media property to the second media property in order to increase a probability of reaching the threshold number of engagements during the prescribed run time of the online advertising campaign.

8. The computerized method of claim 1 further comprising allocating the portion of the allocated number of bids from the first media property to the second media property in order to avoid reaching the threshold number of engagements during the prescribed run time of the online advertising campaign prematurely with respect to the prescribed run time.

9. The computerized method of claim 1 wherein analyzing the historical database including at least the cost per engagement for each of the plurality of media properties includes analyzing at least one of the following engagement parameters:
cost of viewing a creative;
viewing rate;
engagement rate;
cost for completing viewing a creative;
completion rate;
clicks percentage;
cost per click;
viewability percentage;
cost per viewable impression;
average player size;
diversity of the media property; or
private inventory vs. public inventory.

10. The computerized method of claim 1 wherein analyzing the historical database including at least the cost per engagement for each of the plurality of media properties is performed only with respect to advertising campaigns conducted on behalf of one specific client/advertiser.

11. The computerized method of claim 1 wherein analyzing the historical database including at least the cost per engagement for each of the plurality of media properties is performed with respect to advertising campaigns conducted on behalf of more than one client/advertiser.

12. A system for determining an efficient bidding strategy for an online advertising campaign in a digital medium environment of real-time bidding and selection of advertisement opportunities corresponding to viewers simultaneously accessing websites via computing devices, the system comprising:
at least one processor; and
at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions thereon that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the system to:
accumulate over a plurality of online advertising auctions a historical database including at least a cost per engagement for each of a plurality of media properties;
analyze the historical database including at least the cost per engagement for each of the plurality of media properties to determine a ranking order for the plurality of media properties;
assign a score for each media property with respect to at least its historical cost per engagement;
determine a mean score for all analyzed media properties;
rate each media property to determine an impact level by comparing the score for each media property with respect to the mean score;
determine a set of media properties to be targeted for the online advertising campaign based on the impact level of each media property;
allocate a number of bids for bidding on advertising impression opportunities to a first media property comprising a higher impact level compared to the other available media properties;

execute the online advertising campaign in real-time by placing bids for the first media property based on the allocated number of bids; and
during execution of the online advertising campaign:
determine a first probability of reaching a threshold number of engagements during a prescribed run time of the online advertising campaign for the first media property; and
upon determining that a second media property comprises a second probability of reaching the threshold number of engagements during the prescribed run time of the online advertising campaign that is higher than the first probability:
allocate a portion of the allocated number of bids from the first media property to the second media property; and
place bids for the second media property based on the portion of the allocated number of bids from the first media property to the second media property.

Assignees

• Adobe Inc

Inventors

• Thakkar Kevin
• Trenkle John M
• Hughes John
• Rose Adam
• Lopatecki Jason

Classifications

• G06Q30/0249

  based upon budgets or funds · CPC title

• G06Q30/0275 Primary

  Auctions · CPC title

• G06Q30/0242

  Determining effectiveness of advertisements · CPC title