Driving assistant system and method having warning function for risk level
US-9156352-B2 · Oct 13, 2015 · US
US10430680B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10430680-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715702828-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 13, 2017 |
| Priority date | Sep 15, 2016 |
| Publication date | Oct 1, 2019 |
| Grant date | Oct 1, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method is claimed for allocating processor/computing times of a processor or of a computing unit for a vehicle system of a vehicle. The vehicle system is in particular a driver assistance system. The vehicle system has at least two functions, in particular two functions of the driver assistance system, to which processor/computing times are allocated as a function of a signal that represents a state of the vehicle.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for allocating processor/computing times of a processor or of a computing unit for a driver assistance system of a vehicle, comprising: allocating processor/computing times to at least two functions of the driver assistance system as a function of a signal representing a state of the vehicle, wherein each function has assigned to it a control loop such that prior to the functions being executed each of the respective control loops requests a processor/computing time for the associated function. 2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a priority is assigned to each function, and the control loops request the respective processor/computing times for the associated functions in a sequence of the priority of the functions. 3. The method as recited in claim 2 , wherein the associated priorities are assigned to the functions as a function of the signal representing the vehicle state. 4. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the processor/computing times allocated to the functions are adapted as a function of a ratio of tasks given to the function to tasks processed by the function in the allocated processor/computing time. 5. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the processor/computing times allocated to the functions are adapted as a function of at least one of a difference and a ratio of the processor/computing time allocated to the function and the processor/computing time actually required by the function for the processing of tasks given to the function. 6. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein at least one of the functions is for object recognition, the object recognition for recognizing vehicles or pedestrians or traffic signs. 7. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the vehicle state is one of: a speed, a steering angle, an acceleration, or a setting of an operating element, the operating element including a gas pedal or brake pedal. 8. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the allocation of the processor/computing times takes place as a function of environmental parameters, the environmental parameters including a brightness. 9. The method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising: determining a cumulative runtime limit for performance of all the functions; and after a first of the control loops with a priority higher than a second of the control loops requests a respective processor/computing time for the associated function, and before the second control loop requests a respective processor/computer time for the associated function, determining a portion of the cumulative runtime limit that remains unallocated. 10. A computing unit for allocating processor/computing times of a processor or of a computing unit for a driver assistance system of a vehicle, the computing unit designed to: allocate processor/computing times to at least two functions of the driver assistance system as a function of a signal representing a state of the vehicle, wherein each function has assigned to it a control loop such that prior to the functions being executed each of the respective control loops requests a processor/computing time for the associated function. 11. The computing unit as recited in claim 10 , wherein the computing unit is a regulator for an electrical machine, set up, through a corresponding integrated circuit and/or through a computer program stored on a memory, to perform the allocation. 12. The computing unit as recited in claim 10 , wherein the computing unit is designed to: determine a cumulative runtime limit for performance of all the functions; and after a first of the control loops with a priority higher than a second of the control loops requests a respective processor/computing time for the associated function, and before the second control loop requests a respective processor/computer time for the associated function, determine a portion of the cumulative runtime limit that remains unallocated.
Management of image or video recognition tasks · CPC title
exterior to a vehicle by using sensors mounted on the vehicle · CPC title
Ambient conditions, e.g. wind or rain · CPC title
of positioning data, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System] data · CPC title
by reducing the computational load on the digital processor of the control computer · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.