Macro-cell assisted small cell discovery and resource activation
US-2016345224-A1 · Nov 24, 2016 · US
US10423457B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10423457-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715594076-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 12, 2017 |
| Priority date | Mar 25, 2015 |
| Publication date | Sep 24, 2019 |
| Grant date | Sep 24, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Outcome-based adjustment of a software-defined environment (SDE) includes determining a business operation and a corresponding set of tasks to be performed in a software defined environment (SDE), establishing a first resource configuration to perform the corresponding set of tasks to achieve a business outcome target, determining a first resource cost for performing the corresponding set of tasks, assigning a priority level to tasks within the corresponding set of tasks, determining a set of performance indicators corresponding to a task having a first priority level, monitoring the SDE to identify a triggering event, responsive to identifying the triggering event, establishing a second resource configuration based, at least in part, on a performance level of a performance indicator in the set of performance indicators, the second resource configuration addressing the triggering event, and determining a second resource cost for performing the corresponding set of tasks according to the second resource configuration.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: establishing a first resource configuration to perform a set of tasks to perform a business operation; determining a first resource cost for performing the set of tasks; assigning a priority level to individual tasks of set of tasks; determining a set of performance indicators corresponding to an individual task assigned a first priority level; responsive to identifying the triggering event while performing the individual task, establishing a second resource configuration based, at least in part, on a performance level of a performance indicator in the set of performance indicators, the second resource configuration addressing the triggering event; and determining a second resource cost for performing the set of tasks according to the second resource configuration; wherein: the step of establishing the second resource configuration includes evaluating a set of “what-if” scenarios where a set of multiple resource configurations are applied to a behavior model of the SDE to identify a best alternative to the first resource configuration, the best alternative being the second resource configuration. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein addressing the triggering event includes one of scaling up a resource in the first resource configuration for performing a task in the corresponding set of tasks, scaling down a resource in the first resource configuration for performing a task in the corresponding set of tasks, migrating a task of the corresponding set of tasks, re-building a task of the corresponding set of tasks, and re-building the business operation. 3. A computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon program instructions programmed to: establish a first resource configuration to perform a set of tasks to perform a business operation; determine a first resource cost for performing the set of tasks; assign a priority level to individual tasks of set of tasks; determine a set of performance indicators corresponding to an individual task assigned a first priority level; responsive to identifying the triggering event while performing the individual task, establish a second resource configuration based, at least in part, on a performance level of a performance indicator in the set of performance indicators, the second resource configuration addressing the triggering event; and determine a second resource cost for performing the set of tasks according to the second resource configuration; wherein: the step of establishing the second resource configuration includes evaluating a set of “what-if” scenarios where a set of multiple resource configurations are applied to a behavior model of the SDE to identify a best alternative to the first resource configuration, the best alternative being the second resource configuration. 4. The computer program product of claim 3 , wherein addressing the triggering event includes one of scaling up a resource in the first resource configuration for performing a task in the corresponding set of tasks, scaling down a resource in the first resource configuration for performing a task in the corresponding set of tasks, migrating a task of the corresponding set of tasks, re-building a task of the corresponding set of tasks, and re-building the business operation. 5. A computer system comprising: a processor set; and a computer readable storage medium; wherein: the processor set is structured, located, connected, and/or programmed to run program instructions stored on the computer readable storage medium; and the program instructions include program instructions programmed to: establish a first resource configuration to perform a set of tasks to perform a business operation; determine a first resource cost for performing the set of tasks; assign a priority level to individual tasks of set of tasks; determine a set of performance indicators corresponding to an individual task assigned a first priority level; responsive to identifying the triggering event while performing the individual task, establish a second resource configuration based, at least in part, on a performance level of a performance indicator in the set of performance indicators, the second resource configuration addressing the triggering event; and determine a second resource cost for performing the set of tasks according to the second resource configuration; wherein: the step of establishing the second resource configuration includes evaluating a set of “what-if” scenarios where a set of multiple resource configurations are applied to a behavior model of the SDE to identify a best alternative to the first resource configuration, the best alternative being the second resource configuration. 6. The computer system of claim 5 , wherein addressing the triggering event includes one of scaling up a resource in the first resource configuration for performing a task in the corresponding set of tasks, scaling down a resource in the first resource configuration for performing a task in the corresponding set of tasks, migrating a task of the corresponding set of tasks, re-building a task of the corresponding set of tasks, and re-building the business operation.
using virtualisation of network functions or resources, e.g. SDN or NFV entities · CPC title
for predicting network behaviour · CPC title
using network fault recovery (ring fault isolation or reconfiguration in loop networks without recovery actions by a network management system H04L12/437) · CPC title
using software, i.e. software packages (network security related monitoring H04L63/1408) · CPC title
involving simulating, designing, planning or modelling of a network · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.