Stratigraphic and structural interpretation of deviated and horizontal wellbores

US10422924B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-10422924-B2
Application numberUS-201414536289-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateNov 7, 2014
Priority dateNov 8, 2013
Publication dateSep 24, 2019
Grant dateSep 24, 2019

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Methods of generating structural models of highly deviated or horizontal wells may be generated from the measurement of true stratigraphic thickness in three dimensions (TST3D). In one aspect, methods may include generating a structural model from one or more deviation surveys of a horizontal well, one or more single channel log measurements, and a three-dimensional reference surface.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A method for stratigraphic and structural modeling of a wellbore comprising: obtaining at least one deviation survey from a wellbore through a subterranean formation; determining a wellbore path through the subterranean formation; defining a contoured three dimensional reference surface; calculating a true stratigraphic thickness in three dimensions of a bed or rock body in the subterranean formation, wherein calculating the true stratigraphic thickness comprises using a shortest distance in three dimensions between the three dimensional reference surface and any point along the determined wellbore path described by a formation measurement; generating, using an automated interpretation process, a three dimensional stratigraphic model using the computed true stratigraphic thickness in three dimensions, wherein the automated interpretation process performs a plurality of iterations matching the computed true stratigraphic thickness to the at least one deviation survey to generate the three dimensional stratigraphic model; and determining, using the automated interpretation process, a deviated wellbore path through the subterranean formation based on the generated three dimensional stratigraphic model, wherein the deviated wellbore path comprises a longer path through the bed or rock body than the determined wellbore path. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein defining a contoured three dimensional reference surface comprises: utilizing data from one or more selected from a group consisting of a structure map from multiple well tops or markers, mapped seismic horizon data, an arbitrary horizontal plane, and an arbitrary dipping plane. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the formation measurement used to calculate the true stratigraphic thickness in three dimensions is one or more formation measurements selected from a group consisting of resistivity, conductivity, sonic, acoustic, density, gamma ray, neutron porosity, pressure measurements, formation fluid sampling, core sampling, and cuttings analysis. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising basing one or more drilling calculations on the computed true stratigraphic thickness in three dimensions. 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: transmitting a control signal to a bottom hole assembly following the determined wellbore path, wherein the control signal corresponds to a steering command that causes the bottom hole assembly to change to the deviated wellbore path based on the generated three dimensional stratigraphic model. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the three dimensional stratigraphic model comprises a plurality of sequential display panels corresponding to different intervals of the wellbore, and wherein the plurality of iterations reduce a mismatch between the plurality of sequential display panels and the at least one deviation survey. 7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one deviation survey comprises acquired wellbore data, wherein generating the three dimensional stratigraphic model comprises computing forward-modeled wellbore data, and wherein the plurality of iterations match the acquired wellbore data to the forward-modeled wellbore data. 8. A method comprising the steps of: a. obtaining at least one deviation survey from a wellbore through a subterranean formation; b. determining a wellbore path through the subterranean formation; c. defining a contoured three dimensional reference surface within a subterranean formation; d. calculating a true stratigraphic thickness in three dimensions of a bed or rock body in the subterranean formation, wherein calculating the true stratigraphic thickness comprises using a shortest distance in three dimensions between the contoured three dimensional reference surface and any point along the determined wellbore path described by the at least one deviation survey; e. generating, using an automated interpretation process, a three dimensional stratigraphic model using the computed true stratigraphic thickness in three dimensions, wherein the automated interpretation process performs a plurality of iterations matching the computed true stratigraphic thickness to the at least one deviation survey to generate the three dimensional stratigraphic model; f. determining, using the automated interpretation process, whether the generated three dimensional model fits the wellbore path described by the at least one deviation survey; and, if fit is unsatisfactory; g. defining a new contoured three dimensional reference surface and repeating steps (d) and (e) to generate a subsequent three dimensional stratigraphic model; and h. determining a deviated wellbore path through the subterranean formation based on the subsequent three dimensional stratigraphic model, wherein the deviated wellbore path comprises a longer path through the bed or rock body than the determined wellbore path. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein generating a three dimensional stratigraphic model comprises: obtaining one or more formation measurements selected from a group consisting of resistivity, conductivity, sonic, acoustic, density, gamma ray, neutron porosity, pressure measurements, formation fluid sampling, core sampling, and cuttings analysis. 10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising basing one or more drilling calculations on the computed true stratigraphic thickness in three dimensions. 11. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining whether the generated three dimensional model fits the wellbore path described by at least one deviation survey further comprises identifying one or more faults. 12. The method of claim 8 , wherein calculating a true stratigraphic thickness in three dimensions comprises: creating a pseudo pilot well from wellbore path described by the at least one deviation survey using computed true stratigraphic thickness in three dimensions (TST3D) split panels. 13. The method of claim 8 , wherein defining a new contoured three dimensional reference surface comprises: performing a bending operation on the reference surface to improve the fit of the subsequently generated three dimensional model and the wellbore path described by the at least one deviation survey. 14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising creating an operation tree to store alternative solutions for reference surface bending angles. 15. The method of claim 13 , wherein improving the fit of the subsequently generated three dimensional model and the wellbore path described by the at least one deviation survey comprises: obtaining a value for the fit between the data from the subsequently generated three dimensional model and the data from the at least one deviation survey that is within one or more user-defined constraints selected from a group consisting of a regional dip constraint, a minimum bending limit, a maximum bending limit, and a pattern matching method to find similar log signature responses. 16. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining whether the generated three dimensional model fits the wellbore path described by the formation measurement further comprising identifying one or more faults. 17. A method comprising the steps of: obtaining at least one deviation survey from a wellbore through a subterranean formation; determining a wellbore path through the subterranean formation; obtaining at least one formation measurement; defining a three dimensional reference surface using the at least one formation measurement; and performing the steps of: a. computing a true stratigraphic thickness

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Directional drilling · CPC title

  • using generators in one well and receivers elsewhere or vice versa (G01V1/52 takes precedence) · CPC title

  • Geostructures, e.g. in 3D data cubes · CPC title

  • specially adapted for well-logging · CPC title

  • Application of seismic models, synthetic seismograms · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US10422924B2 cover?
Methods of generating structural models of highly deviated or horizontal wells may be generated from the measurement of true stratigraphic thickness in three dimensions (TST3D). In one aspect, methods may include generating a structural model from one or more deviation surveys of a horizontal well, one or more single channel log measurements, and a three-dimensional reference surface.
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Schlumberger Technology Corp
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G16Z99/00. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Sep 24 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).