System and method for adaptive dictionary matching in magnetic resonance fingerprinting
US-2016349341-A1 · Dec 1, 2016 · US
US10422845B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10422845-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514921577-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 23, 2015 |
| Priority date | Oct 24, 2014 |
| Publication date | Sep 24, 2019 |
| Grant date | Sep 24, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Systems and methods for accelerating magnetic resonance fingerprinting (“MRF”) acquisitions are described. The method includes controlling the MRI system to acquire magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) data from the subject by performing a gradient-echo pulse sequence. The pulse sequence includes maintaining residual transverse magnetization through a delay period performed between successive cycles of the pulse sequence. The delay period is selected to allow spins of different tissue types within the subject to evolve differently as a function of tissue parameters within the different tissue types during the delay period.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for generating a map of quantitative parameters of a subject using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, the method including steps comprising: (i) controlling the MRI system to: (1) acquire magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) data by fully sampling k-space, line-by-line, using a first flip angle and repetition time (TR); (2) perform a delay by waiting a time selected to allow magnetization to recover after reaching a steady state; (3) acquire MRF data after the delay by fully sampling k-space, line-by-line, using a second flip angle and TR; (4) repeat (1) through (3) to acquire the MRF data from a desired portion of the subject; (ii) estimating quantitative parameters of the subject using the MRF data by comparing the MRF data to a dictionary database; and (iii) generating a map of quantitative parameters of the subject using the estimated quantitative parameters of the subject and the MRF data. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first flip angle and the second flip angle are different flip angles. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the dictionary database accounts for steady-state MRF data acquisition. 4. The method of claim 1 wherein step (i) includes performing a schedule optimization method prior to acquiring the MRF data to select minimal schedule lengths needed to fully sample k-space. 5. The method of claim 4 wherein the schedule optimization method includes reducing a total number of acquisitions by selecting acquisition parameters that are varied between excitations to improve discrimination between the quantitative parameters. 6. The method of claim 1 wherein step (i)(2) includes interleaving multiple slices during the delay to acquire three-dimensional (3D) imaging data. 7. A method for generating a map of quantitative parameters of a subject using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, the method including steps comprising: (i) controlling the MRI system to acquire magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) data from the subject by performing a gradient-echo pulse sequence that includes maintaining residual transverse magnetization through a delay period performed between successive cycles of the pulse sequence, wherein the delay period is selected to allow spins of different tissue types within the subject to evolve differently as a function of tissue parameters within the different tissue types during the delay period; (ii) estimating quantitative parameters of the subject using the MRF data by comparing the MRF data to a dictionary database; and (iii) generating a map of quantitative parameters of the subject using the estimated quantitative parameters of the subject and the MRF data. 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the dictionary database accounts for steady-state MRF data acquisition. 9. The method of claim 7 wherein step (i) includes performing a schedule optimization method prior to acquiring the MRF data to select minimal schedule lengths needed to fully sample k-space with each repetition time of the pulse sequence. 10. The method of claim 9 wherein the schedule optimization method includes reducing a total number of acquisitions by selecting acquisition parameters that are varied between excitations to improve discrimination between the quantitative parameters. 11. The method of claim 7 wherein step (i) further includes: (a) estimating acquisition parameters that are selected to direct the MRI system to generate a plurality of different signal evolutions that maximize discrimination between different quantitative parameters in a selected number of repetition time (TR) periods; and (b) acquiring the MRF data with the MRI system by directing the MRI system to perform a plurality of successive cycles of the pulse sequence using the optimized acquisition parameters, the MRF data representing the plurality of different signal evolutions that maximize discrimination between different quantitative parameters. 12. The method of claim 11 wherein step (a) includes estimating the acquisition parameters by minimizing an objective function that simulates the acquisition parameters and computed a matrix that is based on estimated values of the acquisition parameters and the quantitative parameters to be estimated. 13. The method of claim 12 wherein step (a) includes selecting initial estimates of the acquisition parameters and forming the matrix based on the initial estimates. 14. The method of claim 12 wherein the matrix comprises a first matrix that defines a dot product between a second matrix and a transpose of the second matrix, wherein the second matrix includes estimates of the acquisition parameters and simulated values for the quantitative parameters. 15. The method of claim 12 wherein the objective function is minimized by searching for the acquisition parameters that minimize a difference between a sum of off-diagonal elements of the matrix and a sum of on-diagonal elements of the matrix. 16. The method of claim 7 wherein step (i) includes interleaving multiple slices during the delay period to acquire three-dimensional (3D) imaging data. 17. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, comprising: a magnet system configured to generate a polarizing magnetic field about at least a portion of a subject arranged in the MRI system; a magnetic gradient system including a plurality of magnetic gradient coils configured to apply at least one magnetic gradient field to the polarizing magnetic field; a radio frequency (RF) system configured to apply an RF field to the subject and to receive magnetic resonance signals from the subject using a coil array; a computer system programmed to: control the MRI system to acquire magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) data from the subject by performing a gradient-echo pulse sequence that includes maintaining residual transverse magnetization through a delay period performed between successive cycles of the pulse sequence, wherein the delay period is selected to allow spins of different tissue types within the subject to evolve differently as a function of tissue parameters within the different tissue types during the delay period; estimate quantitative parameters of the subject using the MRF data by comparing the MRF data to a dictionary database; and generate a map of quantitative parameters of the subject using the estimated quantitative parameters of the subject and the MRF data. 18. The system of claim 17 wherein the dictionary database accounts for steady-state MRF data acquisition. 19. The system of claim 17 wherein the computer system is further programmed to perform a schedule optimization method prior to acquiring the MRF data to select minimal schedule lengths needed to fully sample k-space with each repetition time of the pulse sequence. 20. The system of claim 19 wherein the schedule optimization method includes reducing a total number of acquisitions by selecting acquisition parameters that are varied between excitations to improve discrimination between the quantitative parameters.
based on the determination of relaxation times {, e.g. T1 measurement by IR sequences; T2 measurement by multiple-echo sequences} · CPC title
using a fully balanced steady-state free precession [bSSFP] pulse sequence, e.g. trueFISP · CPC title
by reduction of the scanning time, i.e. fast acquiring systems, e.g. using echo-planar pulse sequences · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.