Systems and methods for steady-state magnetic resonance fingerprinting

US10422845B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-10422845-B2
Application numberUS-201514921577-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateOct 23, 2015
Priority dateOct 24, 2014
Publication dateSep 24, 2019
Grant dateSep 24, 2019

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Systems and methods for accelerating magnetic resonance fingerprinting (“MRF”) acquisitions are described. The method includes controlling the MRI system to acquire magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) data from the subject by performing a gradient-echo pulse sequence. The pulse sequence includes maintaining residual transverse magnetization through a delay period performed between successive cycles of the pulse sequence. The delay period is selected to allow spins of different tissue types within the subject to evolve differently as a function of tissue parameters within the different tissue types during the delay period.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A method for generating a map of quantitative parameters of a subject using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, the method including steps comprising: (i) controlling the MRI system to: (1) acquire magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) data by fully sampling k-space, line-by-line, using a first flip angle and repetition time (TR); (2) perform a delay by waiting a time selected to allow magnetization to recover after reaching a steady state; (3) acquire MRF data after the delay by fully sampling k-space, line-by-line, using a second flip angle and TR; (4) repeat (1) through (3) to acquire the MRF data from a desired portion of the subject; (ii) estimating quantitative parameters of the subject using the MRF data by comparing the MRF data to a dictionary database; and (iii) generating a map of quantitative parameters of the subject using the estimated quantitative parameters of the subject and the MRF data. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first flip angle and the second flip angle are different flip angles. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the dictionary database accounts for steady-state MRF data acquisition. 4. The method of claim 1 wherein step (i) includes performing a schedule optimization method prior to acquiring the MRF data to select minimal schedule lengths needed to fully sample k-space. 5. The method of claim 4 wherein the schedule optimization method includes reducing a total number of acquisitions by selecting acquisition parameters that are varied between excitations to improve discrimination between the quantitative parameters. 6. The method of claim 1 wherein step (i)(2) includes interleaving multiple slices during the delay to acquire three-dimensional (3D) imaging data. 7. A method for generating a map of quantitative parameters of a subject using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, the method including steps comprising: (i) controlling the MRI system to acquire magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) data from the subject by performing a gradient-echo pulse sequence that includes maintaining residual transverse magnetization through a delay period performed between successive cycles of the pulse sequence, wherein the delay period is selected to allow spins of different tissue types within the subject to evolve differently as a function of tissue parameters within the different tissue types during the delay period; (ii) estimating quantitative parameters of the subject using the MRF data by comparing the MRF data to a dictionary database; and (iii) generating a map of quantitative parameters of the subject using the estimated quantitative parameters of the subject and the MRF data. 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the dictionary database accounts for steady-state MRF data acquisition. 9. The method of claim 7 wherein step (i) includes performing a schedule optimization method prior to acquiring the MRF data to select minimal schedule lengths needed to fully sample k-space with each repetition time of the pulse sequence. 10. The method of claim 9 wherein the schedule optimization method includes reducing a total number of acquisitions by selecting acquisition parameters that are varied between excitations to improve discrimination between the quantitative parameters. 11. The method of claim 7 wherein step (i) further includes: (a) estimating acquisition parameters that are selected to direct the MRI system to generate a plurality of different signal evolutions that maximize discrimination between different quantitative parameters in a selected number of repetition time (TR) periods; and (b) acquiring the MRF data with the MRI system by directing the MRI system to perform a plurality of successive cycles of the pulse sequence using the optimized acquisition parameters, the MRF data representing the plurality of different signal evolutions that maximize discrimination between different quantitative parameters. 12. The method of claim 11 wherein step (a) includes estimating the acquisition parameters by minimizing an objective function that simulates the acquisition parameters and computed a matrix that is based on estimated values of the acquisition parameters and the quantitative parameters to be estimated. 13. The method of claim 12 wherein step (a) includes selecting initial estimates of the acquisition parameters and forming the matrix based on the initial estimates. 14. The method of claim 12 wherein the matrix comprises a first matrix that defines a dot product between a second matrix and a transpose of the second matrix, wherein the second matrix includes estimates of the acquisition parameters and simulated values for the quantitative parameters. 15. The method of claim 12 wherein the objective function is minimized by searching for the acquisition parameters that minimize a difference between a sum of off-diagonal elements of the matrix and a sum of on-diagonal elements of the matrix. 16. The method of claim 7 wherein step (i) includes interleaving multiple slices during the delay period to acquire three-dimensional (3D) imaging data. 17. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, comprising: a magnet system configured to generate a polarizing magnetic field about at least a portion of a subject arranged in the MRI system; a magnetic gradient system including a plurality of magnetic gradient coils configured to apply at least one magnetic gradient field to the polarizing magnetic field; a radio frequency (RF) system configured to apply an RF field to the subject and to receive magnetic resonance signals from the subject using a coil array; a computer system programmed to: control the MRI system to acquire magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) data from the subject by performing a gradient-echo pulse sequence that includes maintaining residual transverse magnetization through a delay period performed between successive cycles of the pulse sequence, wherein the delay period is selected to allow spins of different tissue types within the subject to evolve differently as a function of tissue parameters within the different tissue types during the delay period; estimate quantitative parameters of the subject using the MRF data by comparing the MRF data to a dictionary database; and generate a map of quantitative parameters of the subject using the estimated quantitative parameters of the subject and the MRF data. 18. The system of claim 17 wherein the dictionary database accounts for steady-state MRF data acquisition. 19. The system of claim 17 wherein the computer system is further programmed to perform a schedule optimization method prior to acquiring the MRF data to select minimal schedule lengths needed to fully sample k-space with each repetition time of the pulse sequence. 20. The system of claim 19 wherein the schedule optimization method includes reducing a total number of acquisitions by selecting acquisition parameters that are varied between excitations to improve discrimination between the quantitative parameters.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • based on the determination of relaxation times {, e.g. T1 measurement by IR sequences; T2 measurement by multiple-echo sequences} · CPC title

  • using a fully balanced steady-state free precession [bSSFP] pulse sequence, e.g. trueFISP · CPC title

  • G01R33/561Primary

    by reduction of the scanning time, i.e. fast acquiring systems, e.g. using echo-planar pulse sequences · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US10422845B2 cover?
Systems and methods for accelerating magnetic resonance fingerprinting (“MRF”) acquisitions are described. The method includes controlling the MRI system to acquire magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) data from the subject by performing a gradient-echo pulse sequence. The pulse sequence includes maintaining residual transverse magnetization through a delay period performed between successiv…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
The General Hospital, Massachusetts Gen Hospital
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G01R33/561. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Sep 24 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 4 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).