Source mask optimization to reduce stochastic effects
US-9213783-B2 · Dec 15, 2015 · US
US10416566B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10416566-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615781970-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 30, 2016 |
| Priority date | Dec 14, 2015 |
| Publication date | Sep 17, 2019 |
| Grant date | Sep 17, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method to improve a lithographic process of imaging a portion of a design layout onto a substrate using a lithographic apparatus, the method including: computing a multi-variable cost function, the multi-variable cost function being a function a plurality of design variables that represent characteristics of the lithographic process; and reconfiguring one or more of the characteristics of the lithographic process by adjusting one or more of the design variables until a certain termination condition is satisfied; wherein a bandwidth of a radiation source of the lithographic apparatus is allowed to change during the reconfiguration.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method to improve a lithographic process of imaging a portion of a design layout onto a substrate using a lithographic apparatus, the method comprising: computing, by a hardware computer system, a multi-variable cost function of a plurality of design variables that represent characteristics of the lithographic process, the multi-variable cost function being a function of a bandwidth of a radiation source of the lithographic apparatus, or being a function of a variable that is a function of the bandwidth or that affects the bandwidth; and reconfiguring, by the hardware computer system, one or more of the characteristics of the lithographic process by adjusting one or more of the design variables and re-computing the multi-variable cost function based on the adjusted one or more design variables until a certain termination condition is satisfied. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reconfiguration is under a constraint that any geometrical characteristics of a patterning device comprising the design layout are not allowed to change. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the bandwidth is a full width at half maximum (FWHM) bandwidth, or wherein the bandwidth is an E95 bandwidth. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein reconfiguring the one or more of the characteristics of the lithographic process improves an image quality of the portion of the design layout. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein reconfiguring the one or more of the characteristics of the lithographic process increases latitude of at least one of the design variables. 6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the latitude is depth of focus or exposure latitude. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cost function evaluates one or more selected from the following: edge placement error, critical dimension, a resist contour characteristic, worst defect size, exposure latitude, image shift, mask error enhancement factor or focus. 8. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions recorded thereon, the instructions, when executed by a computer system, configured to cause at least: computation of a multi-variable cost function of a plurality of design variables that represent characteristics of a lithographic process of imaging a portion of a design layout onto a substrate using the lithographic apparatus, the multi-variable cost function being a function of a bandwidth of a radiation source of a lithographic apparatus, or being a function of a variable that is a function of the bandwidth or that affects the bandwidth; and reconfiguration of one or more of the characteristics of the lithographic process by adjusting one or more of the design variables and re-computing the multi-variable cost function based on the adjusted one or more design variables until a certain termination condition is satisfied. 9. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions recorded thereon, the instructions, when executed by a computer system, configured to cause at least: computation of a multi-variable cost function, the multi-variable cost function being a function of a plurality of design variables that represent characteristics of a lithographic process of imaging a portion of a design layout onto a substrate using a lithographic apparatus; and reconfiguration of one or more of the characteristics of the lithographic process by adjusting one or more of the design variables and re-computing the multi-variable cost function based on the adjusted one or more design variables until a certain termination condition is satisfied, wherein a bandwidth of a radiation source of the lithographic apparatus is allowed to change during the reconfiguration. 10. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein the reconfiguration is under a constraint that any geometrical characteristics of a patterning device comprising the design layout are not allowed to change. 11. A method to improve a lithographic process of imaging a portion of a design layout onto a substrate using a lithographic apparatus, the method comprising: computing, by a hardware computer system, a multi-variable cost function, the multi-variable cost function being a function of a plurality of design variables that represent characteristics of the lithographic process; and reconfiguring, by the hardware computer system, one or more of the characteristics of the lithographic process by adjusting one or more of the design variables and re-computing the multi-variable cost function based on the adjusted one or more design variables until a certain termination condition is satisfied, wherein a bandwidth of a radiation source of the lithographic apparatus is allowed to change during the reconfiguration. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the reconfiguration is under a constraint that any geometrical characteristics of a patterning device comprising the design layout are not allowed to change. 13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the bandwidth is a full width at half maximum (FWHM) bandwidth, or wherein the bandwidth is an E95 bandwidth. 14. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the reconfiguration is under a constraint that any geometrical characteristics of a patterning device comprising the design layout are not allowed to change. 15. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the bandwidth is a full width at half maximum (FWHM) bandwidth, or wherein the bandwidth is an E95 bandwidth. 16. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein reconfiguration of the one or more of the characteristics of the lithographic process increases latitude of at least one of the design variables. 17. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein the bandwidth is a full width at half maximum (FWHM) bandwidth, or wherein the bandwidth is an E95 bandwidth. 18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the bandwidth or the variable is a function of one or more of the plurality of design variables. 19. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the bandwidth or the variable is a function of one or more of the plurality of design variables. 20. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the reconfiguring the one or more of the characteristics of the lithographic process causes the bandwidth to have a value greater than the minimum that hardware of the radiation source allows.
Wavelength control, e.g. control of bandwidth, multiple wavelength, selection of wavelength or matching of optical components to wavelength · CPC title
Projection system adjustments, e.g. adjustments during exposure or alignment during assembly of projection system · CPC title
Optical proximity correction [OPC] · CPC title
Dimensions, e.g. line width, critical dimension [CD], profile, sidewall angle or edge roughness · CPC title
Masks having proximity correction features; Preparation thereof, e.g. optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.