Vehicle control device and vehicle control method
US-2018151073-A1 · May 31, 2018 · US
US10403145B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10403145-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715409641-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 19, 2017 |
| Priority date | Jan 19, 2017 |
| Publication date | Sep 3, 2019 |
| Grant date | Sep 3, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A distance offset is determined based on a determined time to collision, a relative lateral distance, and a relative longitudinal distance between the target and a host vehicle. A threat estimation is determined based on the distance offset and a distance threshold. A component of the host vehicle are actuated based on the threat estimation.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A system, comprising a computer including a processor and a memory, the memory storing instructions executable by the processor to: determine a lateral time to collision and a longitudinal time to collision; determine a distance offset, based on, a yaw rate, a relative lateral distance, a relative longitudinal distance, and at least one of the lateral time to collision or the longitudinal time to collision, between a target vehicle and a host vehicle; determine a threat estimation based on the lateral time to collision, the longitudinal time to collision, the distance offset, and a distance threshold; and actuate a component of the host vehicle based on the threat estimation. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to actuate a brake when the threat estimation exceeds a threshold. 3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to determine the longitudinal distance offset based on the lateral time to collision and the lateral distance offset based on the longitudinal time to collision. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to determine the longitudinal distance threshold based on the lateral time to collision and the lateral distance threshold based on the longitudinal time to collision. 5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the threat estimation is a brake threat number being a measure of a change in an acceleration of the host vehicle to allow one of the host vehicle to stop and the target vehicle to pass the host vehicle. 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the time to collision is based on an acceleration of the host vehicle, a velocity of the host vehicle, and a yaw rate of the host vehicle. 7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the threat estimation is based on a first threat estimation of the host vehicle and a second threat estimation of the target vehicle. 8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the time to collision is based on a predicted position of the target vehicle relative to the host vehicle at a predetermined time period after a current time. 9. A method, comprising: determining a lateral time to collision and a longitudinal time to collision; determining a distance offset, based on a yaw rate, a relative lateral distance, a relative longitudinal distance, and at least one of the lateral time to collision or the longitudinal time to collision, between a target vehicle and a host vehicle; determining a threat estimation based on the lateral time to collision, the longitudinal time to collision, the distance offset, and a distance threshold; and actuating a component of the host vehicle based on the threat estimation. 10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising actuating a brake when the threat estimation exceeds a threshold. 11. The method of claim 9 , further comprising determining the longitudinal distance offset based on the lateral time to collision and the lateral distance offset based on the longitudinal time to collision. 12. The method of claim 9 , further comprising determining the longitudinal distance threshold based on the lateral time to collision and the lateral distance threshold based on the longitudinal time to collision. 13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the threat estimation is a brake threat number being a measure of a change in an acceleration of the host vehicle to allow one of the host vehicle to stop and the target vehicle to pass the host vehicle. 14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the time to collision is based on an acceleration of the host vehicle, a velocity of the host vehicle, and a yaw rate of the host vehicle. 15. The method of claim 9 , wherein the threat estimation is based on a first threat estimation of the host vehicle and a second threat estimation of the target vehicle. 16. The method of claim 9 , wherein the time to collision is based on a predicted position of the target vehicle relative to the host vehicle at a predetermined time period after a current time.
Lateral distance · CPC title
involving continuous checking · CPC title
Predicting travel path or likelihood of collision · CPC title
with provision for distinguishing direction of travel · CPC title
Taking automatic action to avoid collision, e.g. braking and steering · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.