Method and system for recording and debugging process flows
US-2019095317-A1 · Mar 28, 2019 · US
US10394695B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10394695-B2 |
| Application number | US-201815986751-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 22, 2018 |
| Priority date | Sep 25, 2017 |
| Publication date | Aug 27, 2019 |
| Grant date | Aug 27, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Implementations include a method and system configured to allow users to track, record, and store process instances and use the recordings in the same or different environments in order to test, debug, and repair detected errors and anomalies in process flows. The method and system also provides a conceptual way where users can create tests by recording and playback one or more flow instances along with processing artifacts in order to test and debug their flow in a different environment to ensure flow executions work across updates, releases, and across different environments.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A non-transitory computer readable medium including one or more instructions executable by one or more processors for: receiving a process flow integration instance; determining which nodes of the process flow integration instance to emulate; processing the integration in a first environment instance which includes at least one emulated node; recording a portion of the process flow integration instance as a data recording; establishing a first error threshold for the process flow integration instance with respect to the first environment instance; processing the data recording in a second environment which includes at least one other emulated node; determining errors and anomalies from the process flow integration process with respect to the second environment; and determining whether the errors and the anomalies are within the first error threshold. 2. The computer readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising using a mock service to emulate the at least one emulated node. 3. The computer readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising bypassing at least one inaccessible node and emulating a function of the inaccessible node. 4. The computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein determining errors and anomalies further comprises determining whether an error is repairable. 5. The computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein determining errors and anomalies further comprises determining whether an error is ignorable. 6. The computer readable medium of claim 1 , further comprising recursively repairing at least some of the errors until the errors are within the first error threshold. 7. A computer implemented method comprising: receiving a process flow integration instance; determining which nodes of the process flow integration instance to emulate; processing the integration in a first environment instance which includes at least one emulated node; recording a portion of the process flow integration instance as a data recording; establishing a first error threshold for the process flow integration instance with respect to the first environment instance; processing the data recording in a second environment which includes at least other emulated node; determining errors and anomalies from the process flow integration process with respect to the second environment; and determining whether the errors and the anomalies are within the first error threshold. 8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising using a mock service to emulate at the at least one emulated node. 9. The method of claim 7 , further comprising bypassing at least one inaccessible node and emulating a function of the inaccessible node. 10. The method claim 7 , wherein determining the errors and anomalies further comprises determining whether an error is repairable. 11. The method of claim 7 , wherein determining the errors and anomalies further comprises determining whether an error is ignorable. 12. The method of claim 7 , further comprising recursively repairing at least some of the errors until the errors are with the first error threshold. 13. An apparatus comprising: one or more processors; and logic encoded in one or more tangible media for execution by the one or more processors and when executed operable to: receive a process flow integration instance; determine which nodes of the process flow integration instance to emulate; process the integration in a first environment instance which includes at least one emulated node; record a portion of the process flow integration instance as a data recording; establish a first error threshold for the process flow integration instance with respect to the first environment instance; process the data recording in a second environment which includes at least one other emulated node; determine errors and anomalies from the process flow integration process with respect to the second environment; and determine whether the errors are within the first error threshold. 14. The apparatus of claim 13 , further comprising using a mock service to emulate at the at least one emulated node. 15. The apparatus of claim 13 , further comprising bypassing at least one inaccessible node and emulating a function of the inaccessible node. 16. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein determining the errors and anomalies further comprises determining whether an error is repairable. 17. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein determining the errors and anomalies further comprises determining whether an error is ignorable.
for test design, e.g. generating new test cases · CPC title
by exceeding limits · CPC title
the processing taking place on a specific hardware platform or in a specific software environment · CPC title
Debugging of software · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.