Systems, methods, and apparatus for managing a relay connection in a wireless communications network
US-2016295494-A1 · Oct 6, 2016 · US
US10375722B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10375722-B2 |
| Application number | US-201515566643-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 16, 2015 |
| Priority date | May 14, 2015 |
| Publication date | Aug 6, 2019 |
| Grant date | Aug 6, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Technology for an eNodeB operable to resolve predefined types of concurrent communications at a relay user equipment (UE) is disclosed. The eNodeB can identify the relay UE that is configured to relay proximity services (ProSe) traffic between the eNodeB and a remote UE. The relay UE can be in-coverage of the eNodeB and the remote UE can be in-coverage or out-of-coverage of the eNodeB. The eNodeB can communicate control signaling to at least one of the relay UE and the remote UE to resolve predefined types of communications performed at the relay UE or the remote UE to defined subframes. The control signaling can provide concurrency avoidance at the relay UE for predefined types of concurrent communications between the relay UE and at least one of the eNodeB and the remote UE.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. An apparatus of an eNodeB operable to resolve predefined types of concurrent communications at a relay user equipment (UE), the apparatus comprising one or more processors and memory configured to: identify the relay UE that is configured to relay proximity services (ProSe) traffic between the eNodeB and a remote UE, wherein: the relay UE is in-coverage of the eNodeB; and the remote UE is in-coverage or out-of-coverage of the eNodeB; and communicate control signaling to at least one of the relay UE and the remote UE to resolve predefined types of communications performed at the relay UE or the remote UE to defined subframes, wherein: the control signaling provides concurrency avoidance at the relay UE for predefined types of concurrent communications between the relay UE and at least one of the eNodeB and the remote UE, wherein the control signaling communicated to at least one of the relay UE and the remote UE indicates a defined resource pool of subframes, wherein the relay UE is configured to resolve predefined types of concurrent communications with at least one of the eNodeB and the remote UE when utilizing subframes in the defined resource pool to perform one or more predefined types of communication. 2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein a predefined type of concurrent communication at the relay UE includes a ProSe transmission from the relay UE to the remote UE that conflicts with a cellular transmission from the relay UE to the eNodeB. 3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein a predefined type of concurrent communication at the relay UE includes a ProSe reception at the relay UE from the remote UE that conflicts with a cellular transmission from the relay UE to the eNodeB. 4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein a predefined type of concurrent communication at the relay UE includes a ProSe transmission from the relay UE to the remote UE that conflicts with a ProSe reception at the relay UE from the remote UE. 5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the control signaling communicated to at least one of the relay UE and the remote UE includes scheduling information that causes the relay UE to resolve predefined types of concurrent communications with at least one of the eNodeB and the remote UE. 6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the control signaling communicated to at least one of the relay UE and the remote UE indicates a subset of Time Resource Patterns (T-RPTs), wherein the relay UE is configured to resolve predefined types of concurrent communications with at least one of the eNodeB and the remote UE when utilizing the subset of T-RPTs to perform one or more predefined types of communication. 7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the control signaling communicated to at least one of the relay UE and the remote UE is a ProSe grant of ProSe communication resources that provides concurrency avoidance at the relay UE for predefined types of concurrent communications. 8. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the control signaling communicated to at least one of the relay UE and the remote UE is a ProSe grant of ProSe communication resources that provides concurrency avoidance at the relay UE for predefined types of concurrent communications, wherein the ProSe grant indicates a set of communication parameters including: a physical shared control channel (PSCCH) resource, a Transmit Power Control (TPC) command, and sidelink control information (SCI) format 0 fields (SCI Format 0) that include a frequency hopping flag, a resource block assignment and hopping resource allocation, and a time resource pattern (T-RPT). 9. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the control signaling communicated to at least one of the relay UE and the remote UE indicates two resource pools of subframes, wherein the relay UE is configured to resolve predefined types of concurrent communications with at least one of the eNodeB and the remote UE when utilizing subframes in the two resource pool to perform predefined types of communications. 10. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the control signaling communicated to at least one of the relay UE and the remote UE indicates a first ProSe grant of ProSe communication resources for the relay UE and a second ProSe grant of ProSe communication resources for the remote UE, wherein the first and second ProSe grants cause the relay UE to resolve the predefined types of concurrent communications, wherein the relay UE is configured to distinguish the first ProSe grant from the second ProSe grant based on at least one of: a Radio Network Temporary Identifier (RNTI) associated with each of the first and second ProSe grants, predefined association rules, scrambling codes associated with the first and second ProSe grants, demodulation reference signal (DRMS) sequences associated with the first and second ProSe grants or a defined downlink control information (DCI) format. 11. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the control signaling communicated to at least one of the relay UE and the remote UE indicates a set of prioritization rules that provide concurrency avoidance at the relay UE for predefined types of concurrent communications, wherein the set of prioritization rules indicate that cellular communications between the relay UE and the eNodeB are assigned a first priority level, relay ProSe traffic between the relay UE and the eNodeB is assigned a second priority level, direct ProSe communications between the relay UE and the remote UE are assigned a third priority level, and discovery communications between the relay UE and the remote UE are assigned a fourth priority level. 12. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the control signaling is communicated directly from the eNodeB to the remote UE when the remote UE is in-coverage or the control signaling is communicated to the remote UE via the relay UE when the remote UE is out-of-coverage. 13. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the control signaling communicated to at least one of the relay UE and the remote UE is physical layer control signaling or higher layer control signaling. 14. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein: the eNodeB controls ProSe communication resources in accordance with a first sidelink transmission mode; or at least one of the relay UE or the remote UE selects ProSe communication resources from a defined resource pool of subframes that is configured by the eNodeB in accordance with a second sidelink transmission mode. 15. An apparatus of a relay user equipment (UE) operable resolve predefined types of concurrent communications at the relay UE, the apparatus comprising one or more processors and memory configured to: receive, from an eNodeB, control signaling to resolve predefined types of communications performed at the relay UE to defined subframes; and perform the predefined types of communications with at least one of the eNodeB or a remote UE in accordance with the control signaling received from the eNodeB, wherein the control signaling provides concurrency avoidance at the relay UE for predefined types of concurrent communications at the relay UE; communicate, from the relay UE to a remote UE, sidelink control information that includes a set of parameters over a Physical Sidelink Control Channel (PSCCH) or a Physical Sidelink Shared Channel (PSSCH), wherein the set of parameters indicate Physical Sidelink Control Channel (PSCCH) resources (n PSCCH ), time resource patterns (I TRP ), and a modulation and coding scheme (I MCS ), wherein: the set of parameters enable the remote UE to perform ProSe communications with the relay UE using a defined PSSCH resource pool; or the set of parameters enable the remote UE to utili
Setup of multiple wireless link connections · CPC title
Direct-mode setup · CPC title
Manipulation of direct-mode connections · CPC title
Scheduled access (hybrid access H04W74/02) · CPC title
in the downlink direction of a wireless link, i.e. towards a terminal · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.